Zhao-wei Chen1, Jian Sun, Yu-mei Li, Yong-qiang Chen. 1. Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shanghai 200071, China.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In China, patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are often treated with traditional Chinese herbal medicine. There are certain advantages of traditional Chinese medicine therapy in treatment of RA. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and adverse reaction of Shenshi Qianghuo Dihuang Decoction (SQDD), a compound traditional Chinese herbal medicine, in treatment of RA. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: This was a 24-week prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Ninety RA patients meeting inclusion criteria from Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine were randomly assigned to receive SQDD or methotrexate (MTX) with 45 cases in each group. The patients in SQDD group were orally administered with SQDD twice daily, and the patients in MTX control group were treated by oral administration of 15 mg MTX once a week. All the RA patients were treated for 24 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the number of patients achieving the American College of Rheumatology 20% response. Clinical and laboratory parameters including tender joint count and swollen joint count, patient's global assessment and physician's global assessment (using a 0-10 cm visual analogue scale), duration of morning stiffness, plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) level, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and value of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibody were assessed. RESULTS: After 24-week treatment, the response rates in SQDD group and MTX group were 62.53% (24/41) and 67.5% (28/40) respectively, and there was no statistical difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The patient's global assessment and physician's global assessment, morning stiffness, grip strength, tender joint count, swollen joint count and the levels of ESR, CRP and anti-CCP antibody in SQDD and MTX groups were improved significantly as compared with those before treatment, and there were no significant differences between the two groups. The efficacy of MTX in improving rest pain and joint tenderness was better than that of SQDD (P<0.05). The incidence rate of adverse reactions in SQDD group was 9.75%(4/41), significantly lower than 32.5% (13/40) in MTX group (P<0.05). CONCLUSION:SQDD has a therapeutic effect on RA, and the adverse reactions are less than MTX.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: In China, patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are often treated with traditional Chinese herbal medicine. There are certain advantages of traditional Chinese medicine therapy in treatment of RA. OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and adverse reaction of Shenshi Qianghuo Dihuang Decoction (SQDD), a compound traditional Chinese herbal medicine, in treatment of RA. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: This was a 24-week prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Ninety RApatients meeting inclusion criteria from Shanghai Municipal Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine were randomly assigned to receive SQDD or methotrexate (MTX) with 45 cases in each group. The patients in SQDD group were orally administered with SQDD twice daily, and the patients in MTX control group were treated by oral administration of 15 mg MTX once a week. All the RApatients were treated for 24 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the number of patients achieving the American College of Rheumatology 20% response. Clinical and laboratory parameters including tender joint count and swollen joint count, patient's global assessment and physician's global assessment (using a 0-10 cm visual analogue scale), duration of morning stiffness, plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) level, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and value of anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (CCP) antibody were assessed. RESULTS: After 24-week treatment, the response rates in SQDD group and MTX group were 62.53% (24/41) and 67.5% (28/40) respectively, and there was no statistical difference between the two groups (P>0.05). The patient's global assessment and physician's global assessment, morning stiffness, grip strength, tender joint count, swollen joint count and the levels of ESR, CRP and anti-CCP antibody in SQDD and MTX groups were improved significantly as compared with those before treatment, and there were no significant differences between the two groups. The efficacy of MTX in improving rest pain and joint tenderness was better than that of SQDD (P<0.05). The incidence rate of adverse reactions in SQDD group was 9.75%(4/41), significantly lower than 32.5% (13/40) in MTX group (P<0.05). CONCLUSION:SQDD has a therapeutic effect on RA, and the adverse reactions are less than MTX.