Literature DB >> 20082274

Cutoff value of carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 elevation levels for monitoring recurrence in patients with resectable gastric adenocarcinoma.

Miao-zhen Qiu1, Jun-zhong Lin, Zhi-qiang Wang, Feng-hua Wang, Zhi-zhong Pan, Hui-yan Luo, Yu-hong Li, Zhi-wei Zhou, You-jian He, Rui-hua Xu.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this longitudinal study was to try and improve the specificity of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 in monitoring tumor recurrence in patients with resectable gastric adenocarcinoma by setting suitable elevation levels.
METHODS: One hundred eighty-one patients with resectable gastric adenocarcinoma were considered. Serum samples were obtained preoperatively and every 3 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: Preoperative CEA and CA19-9 positivity rates were 19.9% and 18.2%. The specificity and sensitivity of CEA elevation to monitor recurrence were 92.9% and 23.4% versus 76.5% and 78.9% in CEA-negative versus CEA-positive patients, respectively. For CA19-9 the specificity and sensitivity were 95.0% and 18.8% versus 60.0% and 83.3% in CA19-9-negative versus CA19-9-positive patients, respectively. When we set the elevation level of CEA at 5 ng/mL, the specificity of CEA elevation to monitor recurrence increased to 94.1% for CEA-positive patients. The specificity increased to 93.3% for CA19-9-positive patients when the CA19-9 elevation level was set at 100 U/mL.
CONCLUSIONS: For CEA- or CA19-9-positive patients with resectable gastric adenocarcinoma we can increase the specificity of CEA and CA19-9 by setting the elevation level of CEA at 5 ng/mL and CA19-9 at 100 U/mL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20082274     DOI: 10.1177/172460080902400407

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biol Markers        ISSN: 0393-6155            Impact factor:   3.248


  7 in total

1.  Clinicopathological characteristics and prognostic analysis of gastric cancer in the young adult in China.

Authors:  Miao-zhen Qiu; Zhi-qiang Wang; Dong-sheng Zhang; Hui-yan Luo; Zhi-wei Zhou; Feng-hua Wang; Yu-hong Li; Wen-qi Jiang; Rui-hua Xu
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2010-12-23

Review 2.  A systematic review of patient surveillance after curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a brief review.

Authors:  Roberta Cardoso; Natalie G Coburn; Rajini Seevaratnam; Alyson Mahar; Lucy Helyer; Calvin Law; Simron Singh
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2012-03-02       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 3.  Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9, Carcinoembryonic Antigen, and Carbohydrate Antigen 72-4 in Gastric Cancer: Is the Old Band Still Playing?

Authors:  Andrey Iskrenov Kotzev; Peter Vassilev Draganov
Journal:  Gastrointest Tumors       Date:  2018-04-24

4.  Preoperative serum tumor marker levels in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Erdal Polat; Ugur Duman; Mustafa Duman; Kivanc Derya Peker; Cebrail Akyuz; Necdet Fatih Yasar; Orhan Uzun; Sabiye Akbulut; Erdal Birol Bostanci; Sinan Yol
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 1.088

5.  The value of postoperative serum carcinoembryonic antigen and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 levels for the early detection of gastric cancer recurrence after curative resection.

Authors:  Eung-Chang Lee; Jun-Young Yang; Kyung-Goo Lee; Seung-Young Oh; Yun-Suhk Suh; Seong-Ho Kong; Han-Kwang Yang; Hyuk-Joon Lee
Journal:  J Gastric Cancer       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 3.720

6.  Expression of Matrix Metalloproteinase-7 Predicts Poor Prognosis in Gastric Cancer.

Authors:  Wareeporn Wattanawongdon; Theeraya Simawaranon Bartpho; Taweesak Tongtawee
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-04-22       Impact factor: 3.246

Review 7.  Classic tumor markers in gastric cancer. Current standards and limitations.

Authors:  Călin Căinap; Viorica Nagy; Alexandra Gherman; Sanziana Cetean; Istvan Laszlo; Anne-Marie Constantin; Simona Căinap
Journal:  Clujul Med       Date:  2015-04-15
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.