Literature DB >> 20082124

Subcutaneous immunoglobulin therapy by rapid push is preferred to infusion by pump: a retrospective analysis.

Ralph Shapiro1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIg) replacement therapy for primary immune deficiency disease (PIDD) is a safe, effective, and convenient alternative to intravenous Ig (IVIg) therapy. Although SCIg is typically administered weekly by infusion pump, administration by a rapid push technique may provide a greater degree of convenience. Rapid push administration has been an option at the author's clinic for several years. We report experience with a cohort of patients given a choice between rapid push and standard pump administration.
METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of PIDD patients at a single site who initiated treatment with SCIg (16% solution) therapy between January 1, 2006 and April 1, 2008. Patients selected either infusion pump or rapid push administration after receiving a description and demonstration of each method and training for home self-administration. Demographics, dose, adverse events (AEs), serum immunoglobulin G (IgG) levels, and therapy disposition (discontinued, switched technique) were recorded on a standardized data collection form.
RESULTS: Charts for 104 patients (45 male, 59 female; mean age, 21.1 years; range, 0.5-67.6 years; SD = 17.9 years) were reviewed. Seventy-four patients (71%) chose rapid push. Mean SCIg dose was 32.11 g/month (range, 1.92-89.6 g/month; SD = 8.3 g/month) split into an average of 3.11 times per week. Volume per site ranged from 3 to 20 mL, typically administered over 5-20 min and at one site. Mean serum IgG levels did not differ significantly by administration method: pump, 1,153.06 mg/dL (SD = 240.8); rapid push, 1,225.8 mg/dL (SD = 299.8). Local infusion-site reactions were the most common AEs and were experienced by one third of patients in each group. Only two patients discontinued therapy because of an AE.
CONCLUSION: The results suggest that PIDD patients prefer SCIg administered as a rapid push rather than as conventional pump infusion. Serum IgG levels were comparable between methods, and safety was similar, if not slightly better, with rapid push. Rapid push offers the potential for even greater convenience than the pump infusion technique, although these results should be confirmed in prospective studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20082124     DOI: 10.1007/s10875-009-9352-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Immunol        ISSN: 0271-9142            Impact factor:   8.317


  12 in total

1.  Rapid subcutaneous IgG replacement therapy is effective and safe in children and adults with primary immunodeficiencies--a prospective, multi-national study.

Authors:  Ann Gardulf; Uwe Nicolay; Oscar Asensio; Ewa Bernatowska; Andreas Böck; Beatriz Costa Carvalho; Carl Granert; Stefan Haag; Dolores Hernández; Peter Kiessling; Jan Kus; Jaune Pons; Tim Niehues; Sigune Schmidt; Ilka Schulze; Michael Borte
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2006-04-26       Impact factor: 8.317

2.  The comparison of the efficacy and safety of intravenous versus subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy.

Authors:  H M Chapel; G P Spickett; D Ericson; W Engl; M M Eibl; J Bjorkander
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 8.317

3.  Patients' attitude to subcutaneous immunoglobulin substitution as home therapy.

Authors:  J M Kittner; B Grimbacher; W Wulff; B Jäger; R E Schmidt
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2006-06-17       Impact factor: 8.317

Review 4.  Immunoglobulin treatment for primary antibody deficiencies: advantages of the subcutaneous route.

Authors:  Ann Gardulf
Journal:  BioDrugs       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 5.807

5.  Children and adults with primary antibody deficiencies gain quality of life by subcutaneous IgG self-infusions at home.

Authors:  Ann Gardulf; Uwe Nicolay; Dipl Math; Oscar Asensio; Ewa Bernatowska; Andreas Böck; Beatriz T Costa-Carvalho; Carl Granert; Stefan Haag; Dolores Hernández; Peter Kiessling; Jan Kus; Nuria Matamoros; Tim Niehues; Sigune Schmidt; Ilka Schulze; Michael Borte
Journal:  J Allergy Clin Immunol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 10.793

Review 6.  Subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement in primary immunodeficiencies.

Authors:  Melvin Berger
Journal:  Clin Immunol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.969

7.  Immunoglobulin replacement treatment by rapid subcutaneous infusion.

Authors:  J Gaspar; B Gerritsen; A Jones
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 3.791

8.  Quality of life and health-care resource utilization among children with primary immunodeficiency receiving home treatment with subcutaneous human immunoglobulin.

Authors:  Anders Fasth; Jeanette Nyström
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2008-02-07       Impact factor: 8.317

9.  Safety and efficacy of self-administered subcutaneous immunoglobulin in patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases.

Authors:  Hans D Ochs; Sudhir Gupta; Peter Kiessling; Uwe Nicolay; Melvin Berger
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 8.542

Review 10.  Principles of and advances in immunoglobulin replacement therapy for primary immunodeficiency.

Authors:  Melvin Berger
Journal:  Immunol Allergy Clin North Am       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.479

View more
  29 in total

1.  Use of subcutaneous immunoglobulin in primary immune deficiencies.

Authors:  Elif Karakoç Aydıner; Ayça Kıykım; Safa Barış; Ahmet Özen; Işıl Barlan
Journal:  Turk Pediatri Ars       Date:  2016-03-01

2.  Tolerability of High-Volume Subcutaneous Injections of a Viscous Placebo Buffer: A Randomized, Crossover Study in Healthy Subjects.

Authors:  Clapton Dias; Bassam Abosaleem; Caroline Crispino; Bing Gao; Adam Shaywitz
Journal:  AAPS PharmSciTech       Date:  2015-02-19       Impact factor: 3.246

3.  Opportunities in an Evolving Pharmaceutical Development Landscape: Product Differentiation of Biopharmaceutical Drug Products.

Authors:  Andrea Allmendinger
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2021-04-26       Impact factor: 4.200

4.  Clinical ambiguities--ongoing questions.

Authors:  Troy R Torgerson; Vincent R Bonagura; Ralph S Shapiro
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2012-12-16       Impact factor: 8.317

Review 5.  Immune Gamma Globulin Therapeutic Indications in Immune Deficiency and Autoimmunity.

Authors:  Luanna Yang; Eveline Y Wu; Teresa K Tarrant
Journal:  Curr Allergy Asthma Rep       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 4.806

Review 6.  Home-based subcutaneous immunoglobulin versus hospital-based intravenous immunoglobulin in treatment of primary antibody deficiencies: systematic review and meta analysis.

Authors:  Hassan Abolhassani; Mohammad Salehi Sadaghiani; Asghar Aghamohammadi; Hans D Ochs; Nima Rezaei
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 8.317

Review 7.  Bringing immunoglobulin knowledge up to date: how should we treat today?

Authors:  S Misbah; T Kuijpers; J van der Heijden; B Grimbacher; D Guzman; J Orange
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 8.  Progress in gammaglobulin therapy for immunodeficiency: from subcutaneous to intravenous infusions and back again.

Authors:  Richard L Wasserman
Journal:  J Clin Immunol       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 8.317

Review 9.  Subcutaneous immunoglobulin for primary and secondary immunodeficiencies: an evidence-based review.

Authors:  Jenny Lingman-Framme; Anders Fasth
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 9.546

10.  Subcutaneous immunoglobulin (16 or 20%) therapy in obese patients with primary immunodeficiency: a retrospective analysis of administration by infusion pump or subcutaneous rapid push.

Authors:  R Shapiro
Journal:  Clin Exp Immunol       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 4.330

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.