Literature DB >> 20081222

Multifactor dimensionality reduction for graphics processing units enables genome-wide testing of epistasis in sporadic ALS.

Casey S Greene1, Nicholas A Sinnott-Armstrong, Daniel S Himmelstein, Paul J Park, Jason H Moore, Brent T Harris.   

Abstract

MOTIVATION: Epistasis, the presence of gene-gene interactions, has been hypothesized to be at the root of many common human diseases, but current genome-wide association studies largely ignore its role. Multifactor dimensionality reduction (MDR) is a powerful model-free method for detecting epistatic relationships between genes, but computational costs have made its application to genome-wide data difficult. Graphics processing units (GPUs), the hardware responsible for rendering computer games, are powerful parallel processors. Using GPUs to run MDR on a genome-wide dataset allows for statistically rigorous testing of epistasis.
RESULTS: The implementation of MDR for GPUs (MDRGPU) includes core features of the widely used Java software package, MDR. This GPU implementation allows for large-scale analysis of epistasis at a dramatically lower cost than the standard CPU-based implementations. As a proof-of-concept, we applied this software to a genome-wide study of sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). We discovered a statistically significant two-SNP classifier and subsequently replicated the significance of these two SNPs in an independent study of ALS. MDRGPU makes the large-scale analysis of epistasis tractable and opens the door to statistically rigorous testing of interactions in genome-wide datasets. AVAILABILITY: MDRGPU is open source and available free of charge from http://www.sourceforge.net/projects/mdr.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20081222      PMCID: PMC2828117          DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioinformatics        ISSN: 1367-4803            Impact factor:   6.937


1 INTRODUCTION

Genome-wide association studies hold promise for the discovery of the genetic factors that underlie common human diseases (Hirschhorn and Daly, 2005; Wang et al., 2005). Unfortunately this promise has largely not been realized (Shriner et al., 2007; Williams et al., 2007). It is thought that this failure could be due to epistasis, the role of gene–gene interactions, which has commonly been ignored in these studies. Powerful and model-free methods such as multifactor dimensionality reduction (MDR) have been developed (Ritchie et al., 2001), but an exhaustive examination of even pair-wise interactions in a 550 000 SNP dataset would require the analysis of 1.5 × 1011 combinations. While an analysis of this scale is approachable with modern cluster computing, an analysis that includes permutation testing to assess the statistical significance of results remains infeasible with CPU-based approaches. Rendering photo-realistic video games in real time is also computationally difficult. For video game graphics, specific hardware (the graphics processing unit or GPU) has been developed. The GPU is a massively parallel computing platform that can be adapted to some scientific tasks. We have previously shown that MDR is one of these tasks (Sinnott-Armstrong et al., 2009). Here we provide software which makes practical the analysis of epistasis in genome-wide data through the use of GPUs and demonstrate its application to a genome-wide analysis of epistasis of sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS).

2 METHODS

MDRGPU, a software tool capable of analyzing genome-wide data, is a Python implementation of MDR, which uses the PyCUDA library to run MDR on GPUs. MDRGPU 1.0 supports balanced accuracy, large datasets, execution across an arbitrary number of GPUs, permutation testing and the analysis of high-order interactions. It runs on GPUs which support CUDA (i.e. the NVIDIA GeForce 8800 series and higher). Parallel execution of one realization across multiple GPUs is supported with the pp library for Python. MDRGPU provides a command-line interface for scripted analysis. The GPU architecture has various memory spaces available. MDRGPU uses the constant cache, global memory, shared memory and registers. Shared memory is used to store the intermediate case and control counts for each attribute combination and to store the number of true and false positives and negatives. The global memory is accessed directly to fetch attributes. The constant cache is used in MDRGPU to store the case–control status. Dataset sizes of greater than 65 536 attributes require splitting which is handled seamlessly by MDRGPU. This splitting does not cause linear slowdown; there is simply more overhead of launching, so datasets with large numbers of instances see less of a performance reduction than datasets with few instances. The largest number of addressable attributes is 4 billion requiring 4 GB RAM per instance. In order for the case–control status to be held in constant memory, there can be at most 16 384 instances. Our proof of concept analysis was performed on three GPU workstations (detailed in Supplementary Material S1). These systems contain three GeForce 295 cards, each of which contains two GPUs. For the first stage of this analysis, we used an ALS dataset from Schymick et al. (2007) as our detection dataset. This dataset was obtained from QUEUE at Coriell, but has since been moved to dbGaP. It contains 276 individuals with sporadic ALS and 271 control individuals. These individuals are genotyped at 555 352 SNPs using the Illumina Infinium II HumanHap550 SNP chip. We processed this dataset by removing SNPs with a minor allele frequency <0.2 or those in which >10% of values were missing for either cases or controls. We further used Haploview 's tagSNP algorithm (Barrett et al., 2005) to select representative SNPs from groups of correlated SNPs (r > 0.8). After this, 210 382 SNPs remained and were used in the analysis. For the replication stage, we used a dataset of Irish individuals containing of 221 sporadic ALS patients and 211 controls described in Cronin et al. (2008). We used MDRGPU to perform a two-way analysis across the entire detection dataset. We selected the SNP combination with the best balanced accuracy measure. We then permuted the dataset 1000 times while repeating this analysis. We measured the accuracy of the best pair in each permuted dataset. We then used the 50th best accuracy obtained from these permuted datasets as our significance cutoff. This permutation test yields an experiment-wise α of 0.05. A pair of SNPs with a significant association in the detection phase was tested in the replication dataset. In this phase, the two detected SNPs were selected from the dataset and MDR was used to evaluate only this pair. A permutation test was performed here using MDR on only these two SNPs, and an α of 0.05 was used to assess significance.

3 RESULTS

Our three GPU systems completed an analysis of pairwise interactions in a single permutation approximately every 6 min. The time to analyze the dataset itself for pairwise interactions is the same as the time required for one permutation. One thousand permutations were used to assess statistical significance which required ∼100 h. The time to analyze the same dataset on a cluster with 200 AMD Opteron 2384 (2.7 GHz) CPU cores was just over 1 h without permutation testing and thus a CPU-based permutation test was considered infeasible as the estimated time required on 200 CPU cores was >40 days. In the proof-of-concept analysis, the highest accuracy combination in our dataset was SNPs rs4363506 and rs6014848 with a balanced accuracy of 0.6551. In our permutation test, this accuracy was statistically significant (P < 0.048). In the replication dataset this pair had a balanced accuracy of 0.5821. Permutation testing the replication dataset showed that this result was also statistically significant (P < 0.021). Therefore, not only have we discovered a statistically significant pair of SNPs using an experiment-wise α of 0.05, but we have replicated the significant relationship in an independent dataset. Here is evidence of how the permutation testing allowed by MDRGPU enables the discovery of combinations of SNPs that are significantly associated with a disease.

4 DISCUSSION

While SNP rs4363506 has been reported as associated with disease in Schymick et al. (2007), it did not have a statistically significant effect in Cronin et al. (2008) when considered alone (χ2, P = 0.18) and would have failed to replicate without considering pairwise effects. SNP rs6014848 has not previously been described as associated with sporadic ALS, although it shows main effects (uncorrected χ2, P < 0.05) in both datasets. Greene et al. (2009) have shown that SNPs can fail to replicate a significant association when the joint effect of those SNPs is ignored. This is particularly likely when the populations from which patients are ascertained differs. Schymick et al. (2007) collected individuals from the USA, while Cronin et al. (2008) collected individuals from Ireland. By considering the joint effect of SNPs, MDRGPU discovers a novel association which replicates in an independent dataset. GPUs provide a platform for epistasis analysis in genome-wide data where computational requirements far exceed what CPUs can cost-effectively provide. MDRGPU is a software package for this emerging computing platform that enables human geneticists to tackle analyses previously found to be intractable.
  9 in total

1.  Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps.

Authors:  J C Barrett; B Fry; J Maller; M J Daly
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2004-08-05       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 2.  Genome-wide association studies for common diseases and complex traits.

Authors:  Joel N Hirschhorn; Mark J Daly
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 53.242

Review 3.  Genome-wide association studies: theoretical and practical concerns.

Authors:  William Y S Wang; Bryan J Barratt; David G Clayton; John A Todd
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  Problems with genome-wide association studies.

Authors:  Daniel Shriner; Laura K Vaughan; Miguel A Padilla; Hemant K Tiwari
Journal:  Science       Date:  2007-06-29       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  Multifactor-dimensionality reduction reveals high-order interactions among estrogen-metabolism genes in sporadic breast cancer.

Authors:  M D Ritchie; L W Hahn; N Roodi; L R Bailey; W D Dupont; F F Parl; J H Moore
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2001-06-11       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  A genome-wide association study of sporadic ALS in a homogenous Irish population.

Authors:  Simon Cronin; Stephen Berger; Jinhui Ding; Jennifer C Schymick; Nicole Washecka; Dena G Hernandez; Matthew J Greenway; Daniel G Bradley; Bryan J Traynor; Orla Hardiman
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 6.150

7.  Accelerating epistasis analysis in human genetics with consumer graphics hardware.

Authors:  Nicholas A Sinnott-Armstrong; Casey S Greene; Fabio Cancare; Jason H Moore
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2009-07-24

8.  Failure to replicate a genetic association may provide important clues about genetic architecture.

Authors:  Casey S Greene; Nadia M Penrod; Scott M Williams; Jason H Moore
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-02       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Genome-wide genotyping in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and neurologically normal controls: first stage analysis and public release of data.

Authors:  Jennifer C Schymick; Sonja W Scholz; Hon-Chung Fung; Angela Britton; Sampath Arepalli; J Raphael Gibbs; Federica Lombardo; Mar Matarin; Dalia Kasperaviciute; Dena G Hernandez; Cynthia Crews; Lucie Bruijn; Jeffrey Rothstein; Gabriele Mora; Gabriella Restagno; Adriano Chiò; Andrew Singleton; John Hardy; Bryan J Traynor
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 44.182

  9 in total
  28 in total

1.  Next generation analytic tools for large scale genetic epidemiology studies of complex diseases.

Authors:  Leah E Mechanic; Huann-Sheng Chen; Christopher I Amos; Nilanjan Chatterjee; Nancy J Cox; Rao L Divi; Ruzong Fan; Emily L Harris; Kevin Jacobs; Peter Kraft; Suzanne M Leal; Kimberly McAllister; Jason H Moore; Dina N Paltoo; Michael A Province; Erin M Ramos; Marylyn D Ritchie; Kathryn Roeder; Daniel J Schaid; Matthew Stephens; Duncan C Thomas; Clarice R Weinberg; John S Witte; Shunpu Zhang; Sebastian Zöllner; Eric J Feuer; Elizabeth M Gillanders
Journal:  Genet Epidemiol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 2.135

2.  GBOOST: a GPU-based tool for detecting gene-gene interactions in genome-wide case control studies.

Authors:  Ling Sing Yung; Can Yang; Xiang Wan; Weichuan Yu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Analysis of gene-gene interactions.

Authors:  Diane Gilbert-Diamond; Jason H Moore
Journal:  Curr Protoc Hum Genet       Date:  2011-07

4.  A fast and powerful tree-based association test for detecting complex joint effects in case-control studies.

Authors:  Han Zhang; William Wheeler; Zhaoming Wang; Philip R Taylor; Kai Yu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Exploiting graphics processing units for computational biology and bioinformatics.

Authors:  Joshua L Payne; Nicholas A Sinnott-Armstrong; Jason H Moore
Journal:  Interdiscip Sci       Date:  2010-07-25       Impact factor: 2.233

Review 6.  Risk estimation and risk prediction using machine-learning methods.

Authors:  Jochen Kruppa; Andreas Ziegler; Inke R König
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2012-07-03       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 7.  Systems analysis of high-throughput data.

Authors:  Rosemary Braun
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.622

8.  FastEpistasis: a high performance computing solution for quantitative trait epistasis.

Authors:  Thierry Schüpbach; Ioannis Xenarios; Sven Bergmann; Karen Kapur
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Comparison of information-theoretic to statistical methods for gene-gene interactions in the presence of genetic heterogeneity.

Authors:  Lara Sucheston; Pritam Chanda; Aidong Zhang; David Tritchler; Murali Ramanathan
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-09-03       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  The search for gene-gene interactions in genome-wide association studies: challenges in abundance of methods, practical considerations, and biological interpretation.

Authors:  Marylyn D Ritchie; Kristel Van Steen
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2018-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.