Literature DB >> 20081140

Capacity to give surgical consent does not imply capacity to give anesthesia consent: implications for anesthesiologists.

Catherine Marcucci1, F Jacob Seagull, David Loreck, Denis L Bourke, Neil B Sandson.   

Abstract

There is precedent in medicine for recognizing and accepting intact decisional capacity and the subsequent ability to provide valid consent in one treatment domain, while simultaneously recognizing that the patient lacks decisional capacity in other domains. As such, obtaining consent for anesthesia for a surgical procedure is a separate entity from obtaining consent for the surgery itself. Anesthesia for surgery and the surgical procedure itself are separate treatment domains and as such require separate consents. Anesthesiologists should understand the independence of these functionally linked consent processes and be vigilant with respect to the informed consent process. The cases reported in this article show that capacity for surgical consent may be inadequate for consent to anesthesia because anesthesia involves more abstract concepts requiring a higher cognitive state than surgery, thus requiring a higher state of cognitive capacity for understanding.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20081140     DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181c7eb12

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  3 in total

1.  Parental recall of anesthesia information: informing the practice of informed consent.

Authors:  Alan R Tait; Terri Voepel-Lewis; Virginia Gauger
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 5.108

2.  Not just a separate consent for anesthesia!

Authors:  Sandhya Yaddanapudi
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

3.  Is it time to separate consent for anesthesia from consent for surgery?

Authors:  Tejinder Singh Swaran Singh
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.