Literature DB >> 20081112

Bifurcation and enhancement of autonomous-nonautonomous retrotransposon partnership through LTR Swapping in soybean.

Jianchang Du1, Zhixi Tian, Nathan J Bowen, Jeremy Schmutz, Randy C Shoemaker, Jianxin Ma.   

Abstract

Long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons, the most abundant genomic components in flowering plants, are classifiable into autonomous and nonautonomous elements based on their structural completeness and transposition capacity. It has been proposed that selection is the major force for maintaining sequence (e.g., LTR) conservation between nonautonomous elements and their autonomous counterparts. Here, we report the structural, evolutionary, and expression characterization of a giant retrovirus-like soybean (Glycine max) LTR retrotransposon family, SNARE. This family contains two autonomous subfamilies, SARE(A) and SARE(B), that appear to have evolved independently since the soybean genome tetraploidization event approximately 13 million years ago, and a nonautonomous subfamily, SNRE, that originated from SARE(A). Unexpectedly, a subset of the SNRE elements, which amplified from a single founding SNRE element within the last approximately 3 million years, have been dramatically homogenized with either SARE(A) or SARE(B) primarily in the LTR regions and bifurcated into distinct subgroups corresponding to the two autonomous subfamilies. We uncovered evidence of region-specific swapping of nonautonomous elements with autonomous elements that primarily generated various nonautonomous recombinants with LTR sequences from autonomous elements of different evolutionary lineages, thus revealing a molecular mechanism for the enhancement of preexisting partnership and the establishment of new partnership between autonomous and nonautonomous elements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20081112      PMCID: PMC2828711          DOI: 10.1105/tpc.109.068775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plant Cell        ISSN: 1040-4651            Impact factor:   11.277


  41 in total

1.  Terminal-repeat retrotransposons in miniature (TRIM) are involved in restructuring plant genomes.

Authors:  C P Witte; Q H Le; T Bureau; A Kumar
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-11-20       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Analysis of a contiguous 211 kb sequence in diploid wheat (Triticum monococcum L.) reveals multiple mechanisms of genome evolution.

Authors:  T Wicker; N Stein; L Albar; C Feuillet; E Schlagenhauf; B Keller
Journal:  Plant J       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 6.417

3.  Highly abundant pea LTR retrotransposon Ogre is constitutively transcribed and partially spliced.

Authors:  Pavel Neumann; Dana Pozárková; Jirí Macas
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.076

4.  Mechanisms of recent genome size variation in flowering plants.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Bennetzen; Jianxin Ma; Katrien M Devos
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Gene enrichment in maize with hypomethylated partial restriction (HMPR) libraries.

Authors:  John Emberton; Jianxin Ma; Yinan Yuan; Phillip SanMiguel; Jeffrey L Bennetzen
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Template switching by reverse transcriptase during DNA synthesis.

Authors:  G X Luo; J Taylor
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 5.103

7.  Retroviral recombination and reverse transcription.

Authors:  W S Hu; H M Temin
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-11-30       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  The paleontology of intergene retrotransposons of maize.

Authors:  P SanMiguel; B S Gaut; A Tikhonov; Y Nakajima; J L Bennetzen
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Genome size reduction through illegitimate recombination counteracts genome expansion in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Katrien M Devos; James K M Brown; Jeffrey L Bennetzen
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 9.043

10.  On the tetraploid origin of the maize genome.

Authors:  Zuzana Swigonova; Jinsheng Lai; Jianxin Ma; Wusirika Ramakrishna; Victor Llaca; Jeffrey L Bennetzen; Joachim Messing
Journal:  Comp Funct Genomics       Date:  2004
View more
  16 in total

Review 1.  Co-evolution of plant LTR-retrotransposons and their host genomes.

Authors:  Meixia Zhao; Jianxin Ma
Journal:  Protein Cell       Date:  2013-06-23       Impact factor: 14.870

2.  Retrotransposon domain swapping.

Authors:  Jennifer Mach
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 11.277

3.  LTR_retriever: A Highly Accurate and Sensitive Program for Identification of Long Terminal Repeat Retrotransposons.

Authors:  Shujun Ou; Ning Jiang
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 8.340

4.  Proliferation of Regulatory DNA Elements Derived from Transposable Elements in the Maize Genome.

Authors:  Hainan Zhao; Wenli Zhang; Lifen Chen; Lei Wang; Alexandre P Marand; Yufeng Wu; Jiming Jiang
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 8.340

5.  Convergent evolution of ribonuclease h in LTR retrotransposons and retroviruses.

Authors:  Kirill Ustyantsev; Olga Novikova; Alexander Blinov; Georgy Smyshlyaev
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2015-01-19       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  A role for palindromic structures in the cis-region of maize Sirevirus LTRs in transposable element evolution and host epigenetic response.

Authors:  Alexandros Bousios; Concepcion M Diez; Shohei Takuno; Vojtech Bystry; Nikos Darzentas; Brandon S Gaut
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  Genomic fossils reveal adaptation of non-autonomous pararetroviruses driven by concerted evolution of noncoding regulatory sequences.

Authors:  Sunlu Chen; Huizhen Zheng; Yuji Kishima
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 6.823

8.  TARE1, a mutated Copia-like LTR retrotransposon followed by recent massive amplification in tomato.

Authors:  Hao Yin; Jing Liu; Yingxiu Xu; Xing Liu; Shaoling Zhang; Jianxin Ma; Jianchang Du
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Genome-wide analysis of intraspecific transposon diversity in yeast.

Authors:  Claudine Bleykasten-Grosshans; Anne Friedrich; Joseph Schacherer
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 3.969

10.  Comparative genomic analysis reveals multiple long terminal repeats, lineage-specific amplification, and frequent interelement recombination for Cassandra retrotransposon in pear (Pyrus bretschneideri Rehd.).

Authors:  Hao Yin; Jianchang Du; Leiting Li; Cong Jin; Lian Fan; Meng Li; Jun Wu; Shaoling Zhang
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.416

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.