Literature DB >> 20081097

Factors associated with illness perception among critically ill patients and surrogates.

Dee Ford1, Jane Zapka, Mulugeta Gebregziabher, Chengwu Yang, Katherine Sterba.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We investigated illness perceptions among critically ill patients or their surrogates in a university medical ICU using a prospective survey. We hypothesized that these would vary by demographic, personal, and clinical measures.
METHODS: Patients (n = 23) or their surrogates (n = 77) were recruited. The Illness Perception Questionnaire-Revised (IPQ-R) measured six domains of illness perception: timeline-acute/chronic, consequences, emotional impact, personal control, treatment efficacy, and illness comprehension. Multiple variable linear regression models were developed with IPQ-R scores as the outcomes.
RESULTS: African Americans tended to perceive the illness as less enduring and reported more confidence in treatment efficacy (P < .01 for each). They also tended to report the illness as less serious, having less emotional impact, and having greater personal control (P = .0002 for each). Conversely, African Americans reported lower illness comprehension (P = .002). Faith/religion was associated with positive illness perceptions, including less concern regarding consequences (P = .02), less emotional impact (P = .03), and more confidence in treatment efficacy (P < .01). Lower patient quality of life (QOL) precritical illness was associated with negative perceptions, including greater concern about illness duration and consequences as well as perception of less personal control and less confidence in treatment efficacy (P < .01 for each). These variables were independently associated with illness perceptions after controlling for race, faith/religion, and survival to hospital discharge, whereas clinical measures were not.
CONCLUSIONS: Illness perceptions among critically ill patients and surrogates are influenced by patient/surrogate factors, including race, faith, and precritical illness QOL, rather than clinical measures. Clinicians should recognize the variability in illness perceptions and the possible implications for patient/surrogate communication.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20081097     DOI: 10.1378/chest.09-2124

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  16 in total

1.  Religion and end-of-life decisions in critical care: where the word meets deed.

Authors:  Dee W Ford
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-04-14       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Healthcare disparities in critical illness.

Authors:  Graciela J Soto; Greg S Martin; Michelle Ng Gong
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 7.598

3.  Withdrawing life-sustaining therapy for patients with severe traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  David H Livingston; Anne C Mosenthal
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Patterns of depressive symptoms in caregivers of mechanically ventilated critically ill adults from intensive care unit admission to 2 months postintensive care unit discharge: a pilot study.

Authors:  JiYeon Choi; Paula R Sherwood; Richard Schulz; Dianxu Ren; Michael P Donahoe; Barbara Given; Leslie A Hoffman
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 7.598

5.  Illness perception among hypertensive patients in primary care centre UKMMC.

Authors:  A Norfazilah; A Samuel; Pt Law; A Ainaa; A Nurul; M H Syahnaz; M N Azmawati
Journal:  Malays Fam Physician       Date:  2013-12-31

6.  Belief in charity giving (sadqa) and its role in healing: results of a survey conducted at a teaching hospital in karachi, pakistan.

Authors:  Waris Qidwai; Rumina Tabassum; Raheela Hanif; Fahad H Khan
Journal:  Oman Med J       Date:  2010-04

7.  Effect of a quality-improvement intervention on end-of-life care in the intensive care unit: a randomized trial.

Authors:  J Randall Curtis; Elizabeth L Nielsen; Patsy D Treece; Lois Downey; Danae Dotolo; Sarah E Shannon; Anthony L Back; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Ruth A Engelberg
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-09-10       Impact factor: 21.405

8.  Factors Affecting Patients' Preferences for and Actual Discussions About End-of-Life Care.

Authors:  Shoaib Fakhri; Ruth A Engelberg; Lois Downey; Elizabeth L Nielsen; Sudiptho Paul; Alexandria Z Lahdya; Patsy D Treece; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  J Pain Symptom Manage       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.612

9.  Association between Physician Trainee Self-Assessments in Discussing Religion and Spirituality and Their Patients' Reports.

Authors:  Dee W Ford; Lois Downey; Ruth Engelberg; Anthony L Back; J Randall Curtis
Journal:  J Palliat Med       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 2.947

10.  Determinants of Patient-Oncologist Prognostic Discordance in Advanced Cancer.

Authors:  Robert Gramling; Kevin Fiscella; Guibo Xing; Michael Hoerger; Paul Duberstein; Sandy Plumb; Supriya Mohile; Joshua J Fenton; Daniel J Tancredi; Richard L Kravitz; Ronald M Epstein
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2016-11-01       Impact factor: 31.777

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.