Literature DB >> 20081063

Composite functional genetic and comedication CYP2D6 activity score in predicting tamoxifen drug exposure among breast cancer patients.

Silvana Borges1, Zeruesenay Desta, Yan Jin, Azzouz Faouzi, Jason D Robarge, Sanosh Philips, Santosh Philip, Anne Nguyen, Vered Stearns, Daniel Hayes, James M Rae, Todd C Skaar, David A Flockhart, Lang Li.   

Abstract

Accurate assessment of CYP2D6 phenotypes from genotype is inadequate in patients taking CYP2D6 substrate together with CYP2D6 inhibitors. A novel CYP2D6 scoring system is proposed that incorporates the impact of concomitant medications with the genotype in calculating the CYP2D6 activity score. Training (n = 159) and validation (n = 81) data sets were obtained from a prospective cohort tamoxifen pharmacogenetics registry. Two inhibitor factors were defined: 1 genotype independent and 1 genotype based. Three CYP2D6 gene scoring systems, and their combination with the inhibitor factors, were compared. These 3 scores were based on Zineh, Zanger, and Gaedigk's approaches. Endoxifen/NDM-Tam plasma ratio was used as the phenotype. The overall performance of the 3 gene scoring systems without consideration of CYP2D6-inhibiting medications in predicting CYP2D6 phenotype was poor in both the training set (R(2) = 0.24, 0.22, and 0.18) and the validation set (R(2) = 0.30, 0.24, and 0.15). Once the CYP2D6 genotype-independent inhibitor factor was integrated into the score calculation, the R(2) values in the training and validation data sets were nearly twice as high as the genotype-only scoring model: (0.44, 0.43, 0.38) and (0.53, 0.50, 0.41), respectively. The integration of the inhibitory effect of concomitant medications with the CYP2D6 genotype into the composite CYP2D6 activity score doubled the ability to predict the CYP2D6 phenotype. However, endoxifen phenotypes still varied substantially, even with incorporation of CYD2D6 genotype and inhibiting factors, suggesting that other, as yet unidentified factors must be involved in tamoxifen activation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20081063      PMCID: PMC3816977          DOI: 10.1177/0091270009359182

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0091-2700            Impact factor:   3.126


  34 in total

1.  Genetically deficient CYP2D6 metabolism provides protection against oral opiate dependence.

Authors:  R F Tyndale; K P Droll; E M Sellers
Journal:  Pharmacogenetics       Date:  1997-10

2.  Genetic mechanisms for duplication and multiduplication of the human CYP2D6 gene and methods for detection of duplicated CYP2D6 genes.

Authors:  E Lundqvist; I Johansson; M Ingelman-Sundberg
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1999-01-21       Impact factor: 3.688

3.  Cytochrome P450 2D6 variants in a Caucasian population: allele frequencies and phenotypic consequences.

Authors:  C Sachse; J Brockmöller; S Bauer; I Roots
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Salivary analysis for determination of dextromethorphan metabolic phenotype.

Authors:  Z Y Hou; L W Pickle; P S Meyer; R L Woosley
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 6.875

5.  Pharmacokinetics and CYP2D6 genotypes do not predict metoprolol adverse events or efficacy in hypertension.

Authors:  Issam Zineh; Amber L Beitelshees; Andrea Gaedigk; Joseph R Walker; Daniel F Pauly; Kathleen Eberst; J Steven Leeder; Michael S Phillips; Craig A Gelfand; Julie A Johnson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 6.875

6.  Quick onset of severe abdominal pain after codeine in an ultrarapid metabolizer of debrisoquine.

Authors:  P Dalén; C Frengell; M L Dahl; F Sjöqvist
Journal:  Ther Drug Monit       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 3.681

7.  Codeine intoxication associated with ultrarapid CYP2D6 metabolism.

Authors:  Yvan Gasche; Youssef Daali; Marc Fathi; Alberto Chiappe; Silvia Cottini; Pierre Dayer; Jules Desmeules
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-12-30       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Genetic polymorphism of cytochrome P450. Functional consequences and possible relationship to disease and alcohol toxicity.

Authors:  M Ingelman-Sundberg; I Johansson; I Persson; M Oscarson; Y Hu; L Bertilsson; M L Dahl; F Sjöqvist
Journal:  EXS       Date:  1994

9.  Ultrarapid hydroxylation of debrisoquine in a Swedish population. Analysis of the molecular genetic basis.

Authors:  M L Dahl; I Johansson; L Bertilsson; M Ingelman-Sundberg; F Sjöqvist
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.030

10.  Comprehensive evaluation of tamoxifen sequential biotransformation by the human cytochrome P450 system in vitro: prominent roles for CYP3A and CYP2D6.

Authors:  Zeruesenay Desta; Bryan A Ward; Nadia V Soukhova; David A Flockhart
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  2004-05-24       Impact factor: 4.030

View more
  48 in total

1.  Pharmacogenomic diversity of tamoxifen metabolites and estrogen receptor genes in Hispanics and non-Hispanic whites with breast cancer.

Authors:  Leticia B A Rangel; Jodi L Taraba; Christopher R Frei; Lon Smith; Gladys Rodriguez; John G Kuhn
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 2.  The use of genomic information to optimize cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  Federico Innocenti; Nancy J Cox; M Eileen Dolan
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.929

Review 3.  CYP2D6 genotyping and tamoxifen: an unfinished story in the quest for personalized medicine.

Authors:  Jonas A de Souza; Olufunmilayo I Olopade
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 4.929

4.  Deriving rules and assertions from pharmacogenomics knowledge resources in support of patient drug metabolism efficacy predictions.

Authors:  Casey Lynnette Overby; Emily Beth Devine; Peter Tarczy-Hornoch; Ira J Kalet
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 5.  Tamoxifen and CYP2D6: a contradiction of data.

Authors:  Daniel L Hertz; Howard L McLeod; William J Irvin
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2012-04-24

6.  In vivo assessment of the metabolic activity of CYP2D6 diplotypes and alleles.

Authors:  Daniel L Hertz; Anna C Snavely; Howard L McLeod; Christine M Walko; Joseph G Ibrahim; Steven Anderson; Karen E Weck; Gustav Magrinat; Oludamilola Olajide; Susan Moore; Rachel Raab; Daniel R Carrizosa; Steven Corso; Garry Schwartz; Jeffrey M Peppercorn; James P Evans; David R Jones; Zeruesenay Desta; David A Flockhart; Lisa A Carey; William J Irvin
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2015-08-02       Impact factor: 4.335

7.  Evaluation of CYP2D6 and efficacy of tamoxifen and raloxifene in women treated for breast cancer chemoprevention: results from the NSABP P1 and P2 clinical trials.

Authors:  Matthew P Goetz; Daniel J Schaid; D Lawrence Wickerham; Stephanie Safgren; Taisei Mushiroda; Michiaki Kubo; Anthony Batzler; Joseph P Costantino; Victor G Vogel; Soonmyung Paik; Erin E Carlson; David A Flockhart; Norman Wolmark; Yusuke Nakamura; Richard M Weinshilboum; James N Ingle; Matthew M Ames
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-08-31       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 8.  Pharmacogenetics and individualizing drug treatment during pregnancy.

Authors:  David M Haas
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 2.533

Review 9.  Metabolism and transport of tamoxifen in relation to its effectiveness: new perspectives on an ongoing controversy.

Authors:  Deirdre P Cronin-Fenton; Per Damkier; Timothy L Lash
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 3.404

10.  Prediction of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting from patient-reported and genetic risk factors.

Authors:  Sonam Puri; Kelly A Hyland; Kristine Crowe Weiss; Gillian C Bell; Jhanelle E Gray; Richard Kim; Hui-Yi Lin; Aasha I Hoogland; Brian D Gonzalez; Ashley M Nelson; Anita Y Kinney; Stacy M Fischer; Daneng Li; Paul B Jacobsen; Howard L McLeod; Heather S L Jim
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2018-03-15       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.