Literature DB >> 2008083

Perceptual characteristics of vowel and prosody production in apraxic, aphasic, and dysarthric speakers.

K Odell1, M R McNeil, J C Rosenbek, L Hunter.   

Abstract

Narrow phonetic transcriptions and prosodic judgments were made of single-word imitations by apraxic (AOS), conduction aphasic (CA), and ataxic dysarthric (AD) speakers. AOS and AD subjects showed similar vowel error patterns, particularly predominant errors in low, tense, and back vowels, more distortions than other types of vowel errors, and predominant errors in initial position of words and in monosyllabic words. The CA subjects displayed a different vowel error pattern, notably more substitutions than distortions, more errors in polysyllabic than monosyllabic words, and more errors in noninitial than initial positions of words. Analysis of prosodic features identifiable at the single-word level (e.g., syllabic stress, juncture, and struggles to initiate or complete productions) indicated that syllabic stress errors and more difficulty initiating than completing word production were characteristic of AOS and AD but not CA subjects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2008083     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3401.67

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  11 in total

1.  A Multivariate Analytic Approach to the Differential Diagnosis of Apraxia of Speech.

Authors:  Alexandra Basilakos; Grigori Yourganov; Dirk-Bart den Ouden; Daniel Fogerty; Chris Rorden; Lynda Feenaughty; Julius Fridriksson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.297

2.  Identification and Remediation of Phonological and Motor Errors in Acquired Sound Production Impairment.

Authors:  Adam Buchwald; Bernadine Gagnon; Michele Miozzo
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Temporal acoustic measures distinguish primary progressive apraxia of speech from primary progressive aphasia.

Authors:  Joseph R Duffy; Holly Hanley; Rene Utianski; Heather Clark; Edythe Strand; Keith A Josephs; Jennifer L Whitwell
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2017-02-07       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  Primary progressive apraxia of speech: clinical features and acoustic and neurologic correlates.

Authors:  Joseph R Duffy; Edythe A Strand; Heather Clark; Mary Machulda; Jennifer L Whitwell; Keith A Josephs
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 2.408

5.  Word-level prosodic measures and the differential diagnosis of apraxia of speech.

Authors:  Katarina L Haley; Adam Jacks
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 1.346

6.  Auditory Masking Effects on Speech Fluency in Apraxia of Speech and Aphasia: Comparison to Altered Auditory Feedback.

Authors:  Adam Jacks; Katarina L Haley
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Visuomotor tracking abilities of speakers with apraxia of speech or conduction aphasia.

Authors:  Donald A Robin; Adam Jacks; Carlin Hageman; Heather M Clark; George Woodworth
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2008-06-16       Impact factor: 2.381

8.  Perceptually Salient Sound Distortions and Apraxia of Speech: A Performance Continuum.

Authors:  Katarina L Haley; Adam Jacks; Jessica D Richardson; Julie L Wambaugh
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 2.408

9.  The Nature of Error Consistency in Individuals With Acquired Apraxia of Speech and Aphasia.

Authors:  Lauren Bislick; Malcolm McNeil; Kristie A Spencer; Kathryn Yorkston; Diane L Kendall
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2017-06-22       Impact factor: 2.408

10.  To Lump or to Split? Possible Subtypes of Apraxia of Speech.

Authors:  Marja-Liisa Mailend; Edwin Maas
Journal:  Aphasiology       Date:  2020-10-23       Impact factor: 2.773

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.