Literature DB >> 20080243

The Acoustic Voice Quality Index: toward improved treatment outcomes assessment in voice disorders.

Youri Maryn1, Marc De Bodt, Nelson Roy.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Voice practitioners require an objective index of dysphonia severity as a means to reliably track treatment outcomes. To ensure ecological validity however, such a measure should survey both sustained vowels and continuous speech. In an earlier study, a multivariate acoustic model referred to as the Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI), consisting of a weighted combination of 6 time-, frequency- and quefrency-domain metrics, was developed to measure dysphonia severity in both speaking tasks. In the current investigation, the generalizability and clinical utility of the AVQI are evaluated by first assessing its external cross-validity and then determining its sensitivity to change in dysphonia severity following surgical and/or behavioral voice treatment. The results, based upon a new set of normal and disordered voices compared favorably with outcomes reported earlier, indicating acceptable external validity. Furthermore, the AVQI was sensitive to treatment-related changes, validating its role as a potentially robust and objective voice treatment outcomes measure. LEARNING OUTCOMES: Readers will be able to: (1) explain methodological issues surrounding the development of voice treatment outcomes measures (such as external cross-validity and responsiveness to change), (2) appreciate the relevance of measuring dysphonia severity in both sustained vowels and connected speech, (3) describe the method of obtaining the Acoustic Voice Quality Index (AVQI), (4) appreciate differences among a variety of estimates of diagnostic accuracy, and (5) discuss the AVQI as a clinically valid treatment outcomes measure. Copyright (c) 2009 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20080243     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2009.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Commun Disord        ISSN: 0021-9924            Impact factor:   2.288


  23 in total

1.  The value of the acoustic voice quality index as a measure of dysphonia severity in subjects speaking different languages.

Authors:  Youri Maryn; Marc De Bodt; Ben Barsties; Nelson Roy
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2013-10-26       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Exploring the feasibility of the combination of acoustic voice quality index and glottal function index for voice pathology screening.

Authors:  Nora Ulozaite-Staniene; Tadas Petrauskas; Viktoras Šaferis; Virgilijus Uloza
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  [Test-retest variability and internal consistency of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index].

Authors:  B Barsties; Y Maryn
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Comparing Measures of Voice Quality From Sustained Phonation and Continuous Speech.

Authors:  Bruce R Gerratt; Jody Kreiman; Marc Garellek
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2016-10-01       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  The Effect of SPEAK OUT! and The LOUD Crowd on Dysarthria Due to Parkinson's Disease.

Authors:  Alison Behrman; Jennifer Cody; Samantha Elandary; Peter Flom; Shilpa Chitnis
Journal:  Am J Speech Lang Pathol       Date:  2020-05-18       Impact factor: 2.408

6.  GALP Qualifier Scale: Initial Considerations to Classify a Voice Problem.

Authors:  Marina Englert; Viviana Mendoza; Mara Behlau; Marc De Bodt
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr Logop       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 0.849

7.  Reproducibility of Voice Parameters: The Effect of Room Acoustics and Microphones.

Authors:  Pasquale Bottalico; Juliana Codino; Lady Catherine Cantor-Cutiva; Katherine Marks; Charles J Nudelman; Jean Skeffington; Rahul Shrivastav; Maria Cristina Jackson-Menaldi; Eric J Hunter; Adam D Rubin
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 2.009

8.  [The Acoustic Voice Quality Index. Toward expanded measurement of dysphonia severity in German subjects].

Authors:  B Barsties; Y Maryn
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 1.284

9.  Comparison of Pitch Strength With Perceptual and Other Acoustic Metric Outcome Measures Following Medialization Laryngoplasty.

Authors:  Adam D Rubin; Cristina Jackson-Menaldi; Lisa M Kopf; Katherine Marks; Jean Skeffington; Mark D Skowronski; Rahul Shrivastav; Eric J Hunter
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  Effects of Vocal Intensity and Fundamental Frequency on Cepstral Peak Prominence in Patients with Voice Disorders and Vocally Healthy Controls.

Authors:  Meike Brockmann-Bauser; Jarrad H Van Stan; Marilia Carvalho Sampaio; Joerg E Bohlender; Robert E Hillman; Daryush D Mehta
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2019-12-17       Impact factor: 2.009

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.