Literature DB >> 20080225

Mixtures of n-dodecyl-beta-D-maltoside and hexaoxyethylene dodecyl ether--surface properties, bulk properties, foam films, and foams.

C Stubenrauch1, P M Claesson, M Rutland, E Manev, I Johansson, J S Pedersen, D Langevin, D Blunk, C D Bain.   

Abstract

Mixtures of the two non-ionic surfactants hexaoxyethylene dodecyl ether (C(12)E(6)) and n-dodecyl-beta-D-maltoside (beta-C(12)G(2)) were studied with regard to surface properties, bulk properties, foam films, and foams. The reason for studying a mixture of an ethylene oxide (C(i)E(j)) and a sugar (C(n)G(m)) based surfactant is that despite being non-ionic, these two surfactants behave quite differently. Firstly, the physico-chemical properties of aqueous solutions of C(n)G(m) surfactants are less temperature-sensitive than those of C(i)E(j) solutions. Secondly, the surface charge density q(0) of foam films stabilized by C(n)G(m) surfactants is pH insensitive down to the so-called isoelectric point, while that of foam films stabilized by C(i)E(j) surfactants changes linearly with the pH. The third difference is related to interaction forces between solid surfaces. Under equilibrium conditions very high forces are needed to expel beta-C(12)G(2) from between thiolated gold surfaces, while for C(12)E(6) low loads are sufficient. Fourthly, the adsorption of C(12)E(6) and beta-C(12)G(2) on hydrophilic silica and titania, respectively, is inverted. While the surface excess of C(12)E(6) is large on silica and negligible on titania, beta-C(12)G(2) adsorbs very little on silica but has a large surface excess on titania. What is the reason for this different behaviour? Under similar conditions and for comparable head group sizes, it was found that the hydration of C(i)E(j) surfactants is one order of magnitude higher but on average much weaker than that of C(n)G(m) surfactants. Moreover, C(n)G(m) surfactants possess a rigid maltoside unit, while C(i)E(j) surfactants have a very flexible hydrophilic part. Indeed, most of the different properties mentioned above can be explained by the different hydration and the head group flexibilities. The intriguing question of how mixtures of C(i)E(j) and C(n)G(m) surfactants would behave arises organically. Thus various properties of C(12)E(6)+beta-C(12)G(2) mixtures in aqueous solution have been studied with a focus on the 1:1 mixture. The results are compared with those of the single surfactants and are discussed accordingly. Copyright 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2010        PMID: 20080225     DOI: 10.1016/j.cis.2009.12.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Adv Colloid Interface Sci        ISSN: 0001-8686            Impact factor:   12.984


  3 in total

1.  Quantifying Double-Layer Potentials at Liquid-Gas Interfaces from Vibrational Sum-Frequency Generation.

Authors:  Natalia García Rey; Eric Weißenborn; Felix Schulze-Zachau; Georgi Gochev; Björn Braunschweig
Journal:  J Phys Chem C Nanomater Interfaces       Date:  2018-12-20       Impact factor: 4.126

2.  From Individual Liquid Films to Macroscopic Foam Dynamics: A Comparison between Polymers and a Nonionic Surfactant.

Authors:  Alesya Mikhailovskaya; Emmanouil Chatzigiannakis; Damian Renggli; Jan Vermant; Cécile Monteux
Journal:  Langmuir       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 4.331

3.  Self-assembly, surface activity and structure of n-octyl-β-D-thioglucopyranoside in ethylene glycol-water mixtures.

Authors:  Cristóbal Carnero Ruiz; José Antonio Molina-Bolívar; José Manuel Hierrezuelo; Esperanza Liger
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2013-02-05       Impact factor: 5.923

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.