Literature DB >> 20079589

Laparoscopic surgery for gynaecological cancers in obese women.

Igor E Martinek1, Krishnayan Haldar, Roberto Tozzi.   

Abstract

The use of laparoscopic surgery in the management of gynaecological malignancies has been growing for over a decade. Concomitantly the incidence of obesity has been increasing worldwide. This review summarizes the available studies on minimal invasive surgery in obese women with gynaecological malignancies. We undertook a literature search to identify the differences between traditional open methods and the laparoscopic approach in terms of intra- and postoperative outcome and patient safety. Only eight relevant studies were identified. Six of these focused on endometrial cancer, one study included early stage cervical and ovarian cancers with other benign conditions, while another paper included cervical and endometrial pre-cancers and only a few malignant conditions. Obesity is generally known to increase the risk of intra- and postoperative complications. However, several studies show that obesity, formerly precluding keyhole surgery, seems now to be an indication for the laparoscopic approach. As compared to laparotomy, laparoscopic surgery has a good postoperative outcome, reduced estimated blood loss (EBL) and pain and in some series an increased lymph node count. Laparoscopy has been shown to be cost effective with a shorter hospital stay and return to normal activity. Survival is reported to be the same with both laparotomy and laparoscopy. The benefits of minimal invasive surgery in gynaecological surgery are starting to be found with robotic surgery. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20079589     DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.12.011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Maturitas        ISSN: 0378-5122            Impact factor:   4.342


  6 in total

1.  A Comparison of Laparoscopies and Laparotomies for Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA1-IB1 Cervical Cancer Patients: A Single Team With 18 Years of Experience.

Authors:  Meng Qin; Li Siyi; Hui-Fang Huang; Yan Li; Yu Gu; Wei Wang; Ying Shan; Jie Yin; Yong-Xue Wang; Yan Cai; Jia-Yu Chen; Ying Jin; Ling-Ya Pan
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 6.244

2.  Influence of Morbid Obesity on Surgical Outcomes in Robotic-Assisted Gynecologic Surgery.

Authors:  Abeer Eddib; Alexandra Danakas; Shawna Hughes; Mehmet Erk; Caroline Michalik; Madusudanan Sathia Narayanan; Venkat Krovi; Pankaj Singhal
Journal:  J Gynecol Surg       Date:  2014-04-01

3.  The role of laparoscopy in the surgical treatment of endometrial cancer.

Authors:  Paweł S Pawłowicz; Urszula Ajdacka
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 1.195

4.  Differences in Epidural and Analgesic Use in Patients with Apparent Stage I Endometrial Cancer Treated by Open versus Laparoscopic Surgery: Results from the Randomised LACE Trial.

Authors:  Jannah Baker; Monika Janda; David Belavy; Andreas Obermair
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2013-07-14

Review 5.  Surgical management of early endometrial cancer: an update and proposal of a therapeutic algorithm.

Authors:  Francesca Falcone; Giancarlo Balbi; Luca Di Martino; Flavio Grauso; Maria Elena Salzillo; Enrico Michelino Messalli
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2014-07-26

Review 6.  Robotic surgery for gynecologic cancers: indications, techniques and controversies.

Authors:  Kiran H Clair; Krishnansu S Tewari
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  2020-05-14       Impact factor: 1.730

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.