Literature DB >> 20079571

Rotation of treatments between spinosad and amitraz for the control of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus populations with amitraz resistance.

N N Jonsson1, R J Miller, D H Kemp, A Knowles, A E Ardila, R G Verrall, J T Rothwell.   

Abstract

A farmlet study was conducted over 4 years in which three treatments were applied to six groups of Holstein dairy calves. Calves in each group were infested with equal numbers of N-strain (susceptible) and Ultimo strain (amitraz and synthetic pyrethroid resistant) tick larvae to establish self-sustaining populations with an initial, measurable level of resistance to amitraz. Standard counts of all ticks between 4.5 and 8.0mm diameter on one side of each animal were made each week and treatment was applied when tick numbers exceeded a threshold of 25 engorged adults per side. The three treatments were: 1, spinosad spray whenever tick numbers exceeded the threshold; 2, amitraz spray whenever tick numbers exceeded the threshold; 3, spinosad whenever tick numbers exceeded the threshold for the first 2 months, then amitraz for 2 months, with alternation every subsequent 2 months. Engorged adult female ticks were collected from each treatment group on 10 or 11 occasions during the study and tested using the larval packet test bioassay (LPT) for acaricide resistance. Spinosad 250ppm provided effective control of amitraz-resistant tick populations in the field, using a similar number of treatments as in the amitraz and rotation groups. The initial infestations of all of the groups resulted in the establishment of populations with in vitro evidence of resistance to amitraz using the LPT. Treatment with spinosad or with a rotation between spinosad and amitraz every 2 months resulted in reduced levels of resistance to amitraz according to the LPT. The animals treated with amitraz alone showed increasing resistance to amitraz according to the LPT each summer and autumn with a return to full or almost full susceptibility to amitraz in early spring in all years. This pattern suggests a relative lack of fitness of amitraz-resistant ticks that might be exploited by using an acaricide rotation strategy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20079571     DOI: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2009.12.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vet Parasitol        ISSN: 0304-4017            Impact factor:   2.738


  9 in total

1.  Mutation in the RmβAOR gene is associated with amitraz resistance in the cattle tick Rhipicephalus microplus.

Authors:  Sean W Corley; Nicholas N Jonsson; Emily K Piper; Christian Cutullé; Michael J Stear; Jennifer M Seddon
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Diagnosis of amitraz resistance in Brazilian populations of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus (Acari: Ixodidae) with larval immersion test.

Authors:  Elisa Cimitan Mendes; Márcia Cristina Mendes; Mário Eidi Sato
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2013-04-26       Impact factor: 2.132

3.  SNP Analysis Infers that Recombination Is Involved in the Evolution of Amitraz Resistance in Rhipicephalus microplus.

Authors:  Samantha Baron; Nicolaas A van der Merwe; Maxime Madder; Christine Maritz-Olivier
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Resistance Management for Asian Citrus Psyllid, Diaphorina citri Kuwayama, in Florida.

Authors:  Xue Dong Chen; Lukasz L Stelinski
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 2.769

5.  The effects of sub-chronic administration of sub-lethal doses of amitraz/xylene on selected reproductive parameters of male Wistar rats.

Authors:  V U Omoja; S M Anika; I U Asuzu
Journal:  Iran J Vet Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.376

Review 6.  Acaricides Resistance in Ticks: Selection, Diagnosis, Mechanisms, and Mitigation.

Authors:  Muhammad Kashif Obaid; Nabila Islam; Abdulaziz Alouffi; Alam Zeb Khan; Itabajara da Silva Vaz; Tetsuya Tanaka; Abid Ali
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-06       Impact factor: 6.073

7.  Herbicide cycling has diverse effects on evolution of resistance in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii.

Authors:  Mato Lagator; Tom Vogwill; Nick Colegrave; Paul Neve
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2012-06-11       Impact factor: 5.183

Review 8.  Strategies for the control of Rhipicephalus microplus ticks in a world of conventional acaricide and macrocyclic lactone resistance.

Authors:  Roger I Rodriguez-Vivas; Nicholas N Jonsson; Chandra Bhushan
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 2.289

Review 9.  Rhipicephalus Tick: A Contextual Review for Southeast Asia.

Authors:  Li Peng Tan; Ruhil Hayati Hamdan; Basripuzi Nurul Hayyan Hassan; Mohd Farhan Hanif Reduan; Ibrahim Abdul-Azeez Okene; Shih Keng Loong; Jing Jing Khoo; Ahmad Syazwan Samsuddin; Seng Hua Lee
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2021-06-30
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.