Literature DB >> 20079481

Lessons learned from 416 cases of nipple discharge of the breast.

Mary Morrogh1, Anna Park, Elena B Elkin, Tari A King.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For patients with nipple discharge (ND), surgical duct excision is often required to exclude underlying malignancy. Our objective was to define clinical predictors of malignancy and examine the utility of common preoperative studies. STUDY
DESIGN: We retrospectively identified 475 patients presenting with a chief complaint of ND from 1995 to 2005; 416 (88%) were eligible for review.
RESULTS: Following standard evaluation (clinical breast examination/mammogram/ultrasound), 129 of 416 (31%) were considered to have physiological ND and were managed expectantly, whereas 287 of 416 (69%) underwent further evaluation (cytology/ductography/magnetic resonance imaging) followed by biopsy +/- surgery. Clinical features associated with pathological ND included bloody ND (adjusted odds ratio 3.7) and spontaneous ND (adjusted OR 3.2). Biopsy/surgery identified a causative lesion in 259 of 287 (90%), of which 37% were either malignant (n = 65) or high-risk (n = 30) lesions. The sole clinical predictor of malignant/high-risk lesion was a palpable mass (adjusted odds ratio 4.3). Preoperative evaluation identified 76 of 95 (80%) malignant/high-risk lesions, whereas 19 of 95 (20%) were identified by duct excision alone.
CONCLUSIONS: Although clinical stratification alone reliably identified patients with pathological ND, neither the clinical characteristics nor preoperative studies can reliably distinguish between benign and malignant pathology. Surgical duct excision remains the gold standard to exclude underlying malignancy. Copyright (c) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20079481     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.06.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  14 in total

Review 1.  [Value of galactography for the diagnostic work-up of pathological nipple discharge in multimodal breast diagnostics. Part 2: a systematic review of the literature].

Authors:  K Scheurlen; A Schnitzer; J Krammer; C Kaiser; S O Schönberg; K Wasser
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 0.635

2.  3.0 Tesla breast magnetic resonance imaging in patients with nipple discharge when mammography and ultrasound fail.

Authors:  Nóra Lubina; Ulla Schedelbeck; Anne Roth; Andreas Max Weng; Eva Geissinger; Arnd Hönig; Dietbert Hahn; Thorsten Alexander Bley
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-11-30       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with unilateral bloody nipple discharge; useful when conventional diagnostics are negative?

Authors:  L van Gelder; R H C Bisschops; M B E Menke-Pluymers; P J Westenend; P W Plaisier
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Comparison of ductoscopy, galactography, and imaging modalities for the evaluation of intraductal lesions: a critical review.

Authors:  Ozgur Sarica; Enis Ozturk; Huseyin C Demirkurek; Fatih Uluc
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 5.  Cystic breast masses and the ACRIN 6666 experience.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; Alan G Sechtin; Helga Marques; Zheng Zhang
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.303

6.  An uncommon presentation of ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Rodney Motindi; Peter Mallon; Stephen Dace
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2012-09-21

7.  The investigation and management of unilateral nipple discharge.

Authors:  S E Clark; A Agrawal; S Laws; T Graja; L A Sheehan; C Laban; F Scutt
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Reliability of Breast Ultrasound BI-RADS Final Assessment in Mammographically Negative Patients with Nipple Discharge and Radiologic Predictors of Malignancy.

Authors:  Chae Jung Park; Eun-Kyung Kim; Hee Jung Moon; Jung Hyun Yoon; Min Jung Kim
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 3.588

9.  The impact of malignant nipple discharge cytology (NDc) in surgical management of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Isabella Castellano; Jasna Metovic; Davide Balmativola; Laura Annaratone; Nelson Rangel; Elena Vissio; Riccardo Arisio; Luigia Macrì; Carla Pecchioni; Ivana Sarotto; Francesca Montarolo; Francesca Muscarà; Caterina Marchiò; Paola Cassoni; Janina Kulka; Anna Sapino
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Galactography with Tomosynthesis Technique (Galactomosynthesis) - Renaissance of a Method?

Authors:  Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland; Caroline Preuss; Peter A Fasching; Christian R Loehberg; Michael P Lux; Julius Emons; Matthias W Beckmann; Michael Uder; Markus Mueller-Schimpfle
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2018-06-04       Impact factor: 2.915

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.