Literature DB >> 20079135

Peri-intubation hemodynamic changes during low dose fentanyl, remifentanil and sufentanil combined with etomidate for anesthetic induction.

Guo-hua Zhang1, Li Sun.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although etomidate is associated with very few cardiovascular side-effects and minimal histamine release, it has a less inhibitory effect on the pharyngolaryngeal reflex. Hence, blunting the responses to endotracheal intubation is more dependent of opioids for etomidate-based anesthetic induction. This prospective, randomized, double-blinded study was designed to investigate the effects of low dose remifentanil, fentanyl or sufentanil on etomidate induction with respect to hemodynamics, conscious level changes and drug consumption.
METHODS: Ninety unpremedicated and normotensive patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II undergoing elective major abdominal surgery were randomly assigned in a double blinded fashion to each of the three groups: groups F, R and S. A bolus dose of fentanyl 1 microg/kg, sufentanil 0.1 microg/kg or remifentanil 1 microg/kg was given over 60 seconds in groups F, S and R, respectively. In each instance this loading dose was followed by a continuous infusion (0.1, 0.01 or 0.1 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) of fentanyl, sufentanil or remifentanil, respectively). After 5 minutes from start of opioid infusion, etomidate was titrated at a rate of 20 mg/min to a decrease in bispectral index (BIS) to 50. The time from administration of etomidate to loss of eyelash reflex or to a decrease in BIS to 50 was recorded. The blood pressure and heart rate were also recorded at different five time points. The average maximum percent changes of systolic blood pressure (|maximal or minimal measuring value-baseline|/baseline x 100%) were calculated.
RESULTS: The time and the dosage of etomidate necessary to loss consciousness were greater in group F ((70.0 +/- 15.6) seconds; (0.35 +/- 0.05) mg/kg) than in groups S ((52.3 +/- 15.9) seconds; (0.26 +/- 0.06) mg/kg) and R ((56.2 +/- 20.2) seconds; (0.27 +/- 0.07) mg/kg) (P < 0.01). The three groups took similar time and amount of etomidate to achieve an adequate depth anesthesia (BIS = 50). The average maximum changes of systolic blood pressure were significantly different among the three groups: F, (25 +/- 6)% vs R, (13 +/- 4)% or S, (12 +/- 5)% (P < 0.001). The endotracheal intubation caused marked increases in blood pressure and heart rate in groups F and S, but not in group R, respectively (P < 0.01). The great hemodynamic changes occurred more frequently in group F than in groups R and S (P < 0.01). The incidence of heart rate decreases of more than 30% of the baselines after induction was higher in group R compared with groups F and S (P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: In normotensive and unpremedicated young adult patients receiving etomidate induction, low dose remifentanil or sufentanil significantly reduced the time and the amount of etomidate taken to loss unconsciousness compared with low dose fentanyl, but similar time interval and doses of etomidate were required to acquire adequate depth of anesthesia (BIS = 50) for these three opioids. Remifentanil was more effective in blunting the cardiovascular responses to endotracheal intubation, nevertheless, accompanying significant lower heart rate after induction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20079135

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)        ISSN: 0366-6999            Impact factor:   2.628


  9 in total

1.  Total Intravenous Anesthesia-Target Controlled Infusion for colorectal surgery. Remifentanil TCI vs sufentanil TCI.

Authors:  Horaţiu Nicolae Vasian; Simona Mărgărit; Daniela Ionescu; Anamaria Keresztes; Bogdan Arpăşteuan; Nicoleta Condruz; Camelia Coadă; Iurie Acalovschi
Journal:  Rom J Anaesth Intensive Care       Date:  2014-10

2.  Hemodynamic responses to etomidate versus ketamine-thiopental sodium combination for anesthetic induction in coronary artery bypass graft surgery patients with low ejection fraction: a double-blind, randomized, clinical trial.

Authors:  Mohammad Reza Habibi; Afshin Gholipour Baradari; Aria Soleimani; Amir Emami Zeydi; Hamid Sharif Nia; Ali Habibi; Naser Onagh
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-10-20

Review 3.  Anaesthetic interventions for prevention of awareness during surgery.

Authors:  Anthony G Messina; Michael Wang; Marshall J Ward; Chase C Wilker; Brett B Smith; Daniel P Vezina; Nathan Leon Pace
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-10-18

4.  Sedation and analgesia with fentanyl and etomidate for intrathecal injection in childhood leukemia patients.

Authors:  Chun-Hui Yang; Xin Tian; Hai-Bin Yin; Xiao-Hui Gao; Na Li
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Comparison of fentanil and remifentanil for coronary artery surgery with low ejection fraction.

Authors:  Nukhet Baddal; Cenk Conkbayir; Ozcan Erdemli; Umit Karadeniz; Busra Tezcan; Didem Melis Oztas; Metin Onur Beyaz; Murat Ugurlucan; Yahya Yildiz; Soner Yavas
Journal:  Arch Med Sci Atheroscler Dis       Date:  2020-03-06

6.  Comparison of dexmedetomidine and remifentanil for attenuation of hemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation.

Authors:  Jeong Han Lee; Hyojoong Kim; Hyun-Tae Kim; Myoung-Hun Kim; Kwangrae Cho; Se Hun Lim; Kun Moo Lee; Young-Jae Kim; Chee-Mahn Shin
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-08-14

7.  Comparison of effects of fentanyl and remifentanil on hemodynamic response to endotracheal intubation and myoclonus in elderly patients with etomidate induction.

Authors:  Byung Ju Ko; Ji Na Oh; Jong Hwan Lee; So Ron Choi; Seung Cheol Lee; Chan Jong Chung
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2013-01-21

8.  Effect of Etomidate Versus Combination of Propofol-Ketamine and Thiopental-Ketamine on Hemodynamic Response to Laryngoscopy and Intubation: A Randomized Double Blind Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Afshin Gholipour Baradari; Abolfazl Firouzian; Alieh Zamani Kiasari; Mohsen Aarabi; Seyed Abdollah Emadi; Ali Davanlou; Nima Motamed; Ensieh Yousefi Abdolmaleki
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2016-01-10

9.  A randomized clinical trial comparing hemodynamic responses to ketamine-propofol combination (ketofol) versus etomidate during anesthesia induction in patients with left ventricular dysfunction undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

Authors:  Afshin Gholipour Baradari; Abbas Alipour; Mohammad Reza Habibi; Sajedeh Rashidaei; Amir Emami Zeydi
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2016-10-25       Impact factor: 3.318

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.