Literature DB >> 20078406

Planned home and hospital births in South Australia, 1991-2006: differences in outcomes.

Robyn M Kennare1, Marc J N C Keirse, Graeme R Tucker, Annabelle C Chan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine differences in outcomes between planned home births, occurring at home or in hospital, and planned hospital births. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Population-based study using South Australian perinatal data on all births and perinatal deaths during the period 1991-2006. Analysis included logistic regression adjusted for predictor variables and standardised perinatal mortality ratios. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Perinatal death, intrapartum death, death attributed to intrapartum asphyxia, Apgar score < 7 at 5 minutes, use of specialised neonatal care, operative delivery, perineal injury and postpartum haemorrhage.
RESULTS: Planned home births accounted for 0.38% of 300,011 births in South Australia. They had a perinatal mortality rate similar to that for planned hospital births (7.9 v 8.2 per 1000 births), but a sevenfold higher risk of intrapartum death (95% CI, 1.53-35.87) and a 27-fold higher risk of death from intrapartum asphyxia (95% CI, 8.02-88.83). Review of perinatal deaths in the planned home births group identified inappropriate inclusion of women with risk factors for home birth and inadequate fetal surveillance during labour. Low Apgar scores were more frequent among planned home births, and use of specialised neonatal care as well as rates of postpartum haemorrhage and severe perineal tears were lower among planned home births, but these differences were not statistically significant. Planned home births had lower caesarean section and instrumental delivery rates, and a seven times lower episiotomy rate than planned hospital births.
CONCLUSIONS: Perinatal safety of home births may be improved substantially by better adherence to risk assessment, timely transfer to hospital when needed, and closer fetal surveillance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20078406

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  11 in total

1.  Interpreting evidence: why values can matter as much as science.

Authors:  Inmaculada de Melo-Martín; Kristen Intemann
Journal:  Perspect Biol Med       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.416

2.  Planned home deliveries in Finland, 1996-2013.

Authors:  Katja Ovaskainen; Riitta Ojala; Kati Tihtonen; Mika Gissler; Tiina Luukkaala; Outi Tammela
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 2.521

3.  On being the Editor of the Medical Journal of Australia: Living dangerously.

Authors:  Martin B Van Der Weyden
Journal:  Mens Sana Monogr       Date:  2012-01

4.  Birthplace in New South Wales, Australia: an analysis of perinatal outcomes using routinely collected data.

Authors:  Caroline S E Homer; Charlene Thornton; Vanessa L Scarf; David A Ellwood; Jeremy J N Oats; Maralyn J Foureur; David Sibbritt; Helen L McLachlan; Della A Forster; Hannah G Dahlen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 3.007

5.  The ResQu Index: A new instrument to appraise the quality of research on birth place.

Authors:  Saraswathi Vedam; Chris Rossiter; Caroline S E Homer; Kathrin Stoll; Vanessa L Scarf
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  'I didn't think you were allowed that, they didn't mention that.' A qualitative study exploring women's perceptions of home birth.

Authors:  Jo Naylor Smith; Beck Taylor; Karen Shaw; Alistair Hewison; Sara Kenyon
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Planned private homebirth in Victoria 2000-2015: a retrospective cohort study of Victorian perinatal data.

Authors:  Miranda L Davies-Tuck; Euan M Wallace; Mary-Ann Davey; Vickie Veitch; Jeremy Oats
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Comparing the odds of postpartum haemorrhage in planned home birth against planned hospital birth: results of an observational study of over 500,000 maternities in the UK.

Authors:  Andrea Nove; Ann Berrington; Zoë Matthews
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-11-19       Impact factor: 3.007

Review 9.  Planned home birth: benefits, risks, and opportunities.

Authors:  Ruth Zielinski; Kelly Ackerson; Lisa Kane Low
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2015-04-08

10.  Women's reasons for, and experiences of, choosing a homebirth following a caesarean section.

Authors:  Hazel Keedle; Virginia Schmied; Elaine Burns; Hannah G Dahlen
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2015-09-03       Impact factor: 3.007

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.