Literature DB >> 20078189

Healthcare resource utilization following switch or discontinuation in multiple sclerosis patients on disease modifying drugs.

Matthew W Reynolds1, Reejis Stephen, Chris Seaman, Kitty Rajagopalan.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to explore the cost and utilization in the period following discontinuations or switches of disease modifying drugs (DMDs) for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Secondary objectives included an assessment of the time to switch or discontinuation from index DMD treatment.
METHODS: Cases were defined as a billed MS diagnosis in continuously enrolled patients initiated with interferon-beta1a IM, interferon-beta1b SC, glatiramer acetate, and interferon-beta1a SC found in the PharMetrics Patient-Centric Database. Information on patient demographics, diagnoses, procedures, pharmacy-dispensed drugs, and costs was extracted; reasons for discontinuation and expenses outside of the healthcare system were not available. Treatment discontinuations and switches between study drugs were defined using pharmacy prescription patterns and analyzed by descriptive and regression methods. The non-pharmacy medical costs in the 18 months following switching or discontinuation were compared to the costs in a randomly selected similar period for those patients who did not switch or discontinue these agents.
RESULTS: A total of 5,772 MS patients were continuously enrolled and were treated with one or more of the four drugs of interest, and about half of these patients switched drugs or discontinued treatment for at least 90 days. Patients initiated with interferon-beta1b SC were more likely to discontinue treatment compared to interferon-beta1a IM users. Non-pharmaceutical medical costs were highest for those switching treatments followed by those discontinuing DMDs in the 18 months following a switch or discontinuation, compared to persistent users of these drugs. Interferon beta1b SC initiators had higher costs following changes or discontinuations, while glatiramer acetate and interferon-beta1a SC users had lower subsequent costs compared to interferon-beta1a IM users. LIMITATIONS: Unfortunately, the reasons for stopping the initial treatment cannot be determined from analysis of an administrative claims database. Also, the MS cases followed in this analysis are billing diagnostic events unconfirmed through a review of medical records or other data sources. The results are unstratified in terms of severity and thus while treatment patterns may vary for patients with different types of MS (e.g., progressive vs. relapsing-remitting), this cannot be examined in this analysis.
CONCLUSION: Changing or discontinuing DMDs is common among MS patients and is associated with higher non-pharmaceutical medical costs that vary based on the initiating drug and other demographics characteristics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20078189     DOI: 10.3111/13696990903579501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Econ        ISSN: 1369-6998            Impact factor:   2.448


  8 in total

1.  Changes in first-line injectable disease-modifying therapy for multiple sclerosis: predictors of non-adherence, switching, discontinuation, and interruption of drugs.

Authors:  Luca Degli Esposti; Carlo Piccinni; Diego Sangiorgi; Valentina Perrone; Lucia Aledda; Maria Giovanna Marrosu; Fabio Lombardo
Journal:  Neurol Sci       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 3.307

2.  Lateral and escalation therapy in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a comparative study.

Authors:  Emanuele D'Amico; Carmela Leone; Aurora Zanghì; Salvatore Lo Fermo; Francesco Patti
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 3.  Economics and Cost-Effectiveness of Multiple Sclerosis Therapies in the USA.

Authors:  Daniel M Hartung
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 7.620

4.  No evidence of disease activity: indirect comparisons of oral therapies for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Richard Nixon; Niklas Bergvall; Davorka Tomic; Nikolaos Sfikas; Gary Cutter; Gavin Giovannoni
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 3.845

5.  An evaluation of adherence in patients with multiple sclerosis newly initiating treatment with a self-injectable or an oral disease-modifying drug.

Authors:  Michael Munsell; Molly Frean; Joseph Menzin; Amy L Phillips
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2016-12-30       Impact factor: 2.711

6.  Cost-effectiveness of multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapies: a systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  David Yamamoto; Jonathan D Campbell
Journal:  Autoimmune Dis       Date:  2012-12-06

7.  The Australian Multiple Sclerosis (MS) immunotherapy study: a prospective, multicentre study of drug utilisation using the MSBase platform.

Authors:  Vilija G Jokubaitis; Tim Spelman; Jeannette Lechner-Scott; Michael Barnett; Cameron Shaw; Steve Vucic; Danny Liew; Helmut Butzkueven; Mark Slee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Relapse rates in patients with multiple sclerosis switching from interferon to fingolimod or glatiramer acetate: a US claims database study.

Authors:  Niklas Bergvall; Charles Makin; Raquel Lahoz; Neetu Agashivala; Ashish Pradhan; Gorana Capkun; Allison A Petrilla; Swapna U Karkare; Catherine Balderston McGuiness; Jonathan R Korn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.