Literature DB >> 20077361

Risk factors for regrowth of intracranial meningiomas after gamma knife radiosurgery: importance of the histopathological grade and MIB-1 index.

K Nakaya1, M Chernov, H Kasuya, M Izawa, M Hayashi, K Kato, O Kubo, Y Muragaki, H Iseki, T Hori, Y Okada, K Takakura.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The influence of histopathological grade and MIB-1 index of intracranial meningioma on the results of its radiosurgical management is not clear. The objective of the present retrospective study was to make an evaluation of these factors along with an analysis of other variables associated with progression-free survival after gamma knife radiosurgery (GKR). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-four intracranial meningiomas with known detailed histopathological diagnosis were analyzed. Tumors of WHO histopathological grades I, II, and III were diagnosed in 24, 3, and 7 cases, respectively. The median MIB-1 index was 1.3% (range: 0-31.9%). In 14 cases the MIB-1 index was 3.0% and more. In 26 cases the treatment was done at the time of tumor recurrence. Median volume of the neoplasm at the time of GKR was 4.1 mL (range: 0.4-43.1 mL). Median marginal dose was 12 Gy (range: 8-19 Gy). Median length of follow-up constituted 63 months (range: 19-132 months).
RESULTS: Actuarial progression-free survival at 1, 3, 5, and 10 years constituted 100, 94, 83, and 58%, respectively. Histopathological grade II or III (p<0.0001), MIB-1 index 3% and more (p=0.0004), and non-skull base location (p=0.0026) of the tumor showed negative associations with progression-free survival in multivariate analyses. Actuarial progression-free survival at 5 years after GKR for benign and non-benign meningiomas constituted 100 and 45%, respectively (p<0.0001).
CONCLUSION: Radiosurgery is a highly effective management option for benign intracranial meningiomas, but growth control of non-benign ones is significantly worse. It requires close neuroradiological follow-up and necessitates the search for modified treatment strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20077361     DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1243244

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Minim Invasive Neurosurg        ISSN: 0946-7211


  5 in total

1.  [Modern skull base surgery from the perspective of neurosurgeons].

Authors:  U Spetzger
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.284

Review 2.  Pathological classification and molecular genetics of meningiomas.

Authors:  Christian Mawrin; Arie Perry
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2010-09-01       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Skull Base Meningiomas in Patients with Neurofibromatosis Type 2: An International Multicenter Study Evaluating Stereotactic Radiosurgery.

Authors:  Henry Ruiz-Garcia; Daniel M Trifiletti; Nasser Mohammed; Yi-Chieh Hung; Zhiyuan Xu; Tomas Chytka; Roman Liscak; Manjul Tripathi; David Arsanious; Christopher P Cifarelli; Marco Perez Caceres; David Mathieu; Herwin Speckter; Gautam U Mehta; Gregory P Lekovic; Jason P Sheehan
Journal:  J Neurol Surg B Skull Base       Date:  2021-01-19

4.  Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) Induced Higher-Grade Transformation of a Benign Meningioma into Atypical Meningioma.

Authors:  Ali Basalamah; Mohammed Al-Bolbol; Osman Ahmed; Nagoud Ali; Sabah Al-Rashed
Journal:  Case Rep Surg       Date:  2022-02-23

5.  Linac-based stereotactic radiotherapy and radiosurgery in patients with meningioma.

Authors:  David Kaul; Volker Budach; Reinhard Wurm; Arne Gruen; Lukas Graaf; Piet Habbel; Harun Badakhshi
Journal:  Radiat Oncol       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 3.481

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.