Literature DB >> 20077213

Risk assessment for the combinational effects of food color additives: neural progenitor cells and hippocampal neurogenesis.

Mikyung Park1, Hee Ra Park, So Jung Kim, Min-Sun Kim, Kyoung Hye Kong, Hyun Soo Kim, Ein Ji Gong, Mi Eun Kim, Hyung Sik Kim, Byung Mu Lee, Jaewon Lee.   

Abstract

In 2006, the Korea Food and Drug Administration reported that combinations of dietary colors such as allura red AC (R40), tartrazine (Y4), sunset yellow FCF (Y5), amaranth (R2), and brilliant blue FCF (B1) are widely used in food manufacturing. Although individual tar food colors are controlled based on acceptable daily intake (ADI), there is no apparent information available for how combinations of these additives affect food safety. In the current study, the potencies of single and combination use of R40, Y4, Y5, R2, and B1 were examined on neural progenitor cell (NPC) toxicity, a biomarker for developmental stage, and neurogenesis, indicative of adult central nervous system (CNS) functions. R40 and R2 reduced NPC proliferation and viability in mouse multipotent NPC, in the developing CNS model. Among several combinations tested in mouse model, combination of Y4 and B1 at 1000-fold higher than average daily intake in Korea significantly decreased numbers of newly generated cells in adult mouse hippocampus, indicating potent adverse actions on hippocampal neurogenesis. However, other combinations including R40 and R2 did not affect adult hippocampal neurogenesis in the dentate gyrus. Evidence indicates that single and combination use of most tar food colors may be safe with respect to risk using developmental NPC and adult hippocampal neurogenesis. However, the response to excessively high dose combination of Y4 and B1 is suggestive of synergistic effects to suppress proliferation of NPC in adult hippocampus. Data indicated that combinations of tar colors may adversely affect both developmental and adult hippocampal neurogenesis; thus, further extensive studies are required to assess the safety of these additive combinations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20077213     DOI: 10.1080/15287390903212816

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health A        ISSN: 0098-4108


  6 in total

1.  Is tartrazine really safe? In silico and ex vivo toxicological studies in human leukocytes: a question of dose.

Authors:  Jassana Moreira Floriano; Emanoeli da Rosa; Queila Daiane Fonseca do Amaral; Luísa Zuravski; Pamella Eduardha Espindola Chaves; Michel Mansur Machado; Luís Flávio Souza de Oliveira
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2018-07-20       Impact factor: 3.524

2.  Developmental toxicity assessment of common excipients using a stem cell-based in vitro morphogenesis model.

Authors:  Chloe J Yuan; Yusuke Marikawa
Journal:  Food Chem Toxicol       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 6.023

3.  Inhibition of neuronal voltage-gated sodium channels by brilliant blue G.

Authors:  Sooyeon Jo; Bruce P Bean
Journal:  Mol Pharmacol       Date:  2011-05-02       Impact factor: 4.436

4.  Genetic damage induced by a food coloring dye (sunset yellow) on meristematic cells of Brassica campestris L.

Authors:  Kshama Dwivedi; Girjesh Kumar
Journal:  J Environ Public Health       Date:  2015-04-14

Review 5.  All You Can Feed: Some Comments on Production of Mouse Diets Used in Biomedical Research with Special Emphasis on Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Research.

Authors:  Sabine Weiskirchen; Katharina Weiper; René H Tolba; Ralf Weiskirchen
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2020-01-07       Impact factor: 5.717

6.  Lifespan psychomotor behaviour profiles of multigenerational prenatal stress and artificial food dye effects in rats.

Authors:  Zachary T Erickson; Erin A Falkenberg; Gerlinde A S Metz
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.