Literature DB >> 20075735

Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: recent advances and review of the literature.

Michael E Woods1, Peter Wiklund, Erik P Castle.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) continues to provide a minimally invasive option to the management of bladder cancer. Its utilization appears to be steadily increasing. The purpose of this paper is to review recent advances and outcomes related to robot-assisted radical cystectomy. RECENT
FINDINGS: There are an increasing number of publications and abstracts related to robot-assisted radical cystectomy. In a majority of these case series, the urinary diversion is performed extracorporeally due to improved operative times. There has been some larger series published within the last year, which have provided some meaningful insight into the perioperative and oncologic issues related to the procedure. Several of these reports have provided a retrospective comparison to open radical cystectomy. In experienced hands, this procedure can be accomplished in a reasonable amount of time with appropriate pathologic outcomes, whereas providing decreased complication rates, EBL, and transfusion rates as well as improved convalescence compared with open-radical cystectomy. Although no long-term survival data exists to date, intermediate-term follow-up is beginning to emerge and appears similar to open-radical cystectomy in nonrandomized comparisons.
SUMMARY: Robot-assisted radical cystectomy is a reproducible, minimally invasive approach to radical cystectomy. Patients appear to derive benefit from this approach in regards to complications and convalescence without evidence of compromise to early and intermediate oncological outcomes. Long-term oncologic follow-up and, ideally, randomized prospective comparisons to open radical cystectomy are needed to further validate this procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20075735     DOI: 10.1097/MOU.0b013e328336258f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Urol        ISSN: 0963-0643            Impact factor:   2.309


  7 in total

1.  The emergence of surgeon-controlled robotic surgery in urologic oncology.

Authors:  Timil H Patel; Paurush Babbar; Ashok K Hemal
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-12-07

Review 2.  The evolution of cancer surgery and future perspectives.

Authors:  Lynda Wyld; Riccardo A Audisio; Graeme J Poston
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 66.675

3.  Comparison of anesthetic management and outcomes of robot-assisted versus open radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Terrence L Trentman; Sharon L Fassett; Dustin McGirr; Brad Anderson; Yu-Hui H Chang; Rafael Nunez Nateras; Erik P Castle; David M Rosenfeld
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2012-09-22

Review 4.  Current Status of Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy and Intracorporeal Urinary Diversion.

Authors:  Raj Kurpad; Michael Woods; Raj Pruthi
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.092

5.  Ureteric duplication is not a contraindication for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystoprostatectomy and intracorporeal Studer pouch formation.

Authors:  Abdullah Erdem Canda; Bayram Dogan; Ali Fuat Atmaca; Ziya Akbulut; Mevlana Derya Balbay
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2011 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

6.  Standardized analysis of complications after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: Korea University Hospital experience.

Authors:  Jong Hyun Pyun; Hyung Keun Kim; Jae Yoon Kim; Seung Bin Kim; Seok Cho; Sung Gu Kang; Young Hwii Ko; Jun Cheon; Jeong Gu Lee; Je Jong Kim; Seok Ho Kang
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-01-12

Review 7.  Comparison of TORS with Conventional Surgery for Oropharyngeal Carcinomas in T1-T4 Lesions.

Authors:  Khushal Gangwani; Lakshmi Shetty; Ratnadeepika Seshagiri; Deepak Kulkarni
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019 Jul-Dec
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.