Ivan Harnden1, Kathleen Kiernan, Mary Kearns-Jonker. 1. Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Saban Research Institute, Childrens Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California 90027, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Anti-nonGal xenoantibodies are a major barrier to the survival of genetically modified porcine xenografts. This review summarizes the contribution of anti-nonGal xenoantibodies to the activation of porcine endothelial cells and graft rejection, and further provides an update on recent advancements in defining the unique features of anti-nonGal xenoantibody structure. RECENT FINDINGS: Anti-nonGal xenoantibodies pre-exist at low levels in humans and nonhuman primates, and are notably absent in neonates. Exposure of nonhuman primates to alpha1,3-galactosyltransferase gene knockout endothelial cells initiates an induced xenoantibody response that is restricted and encoded by the germline immunoglobulin heavy chain gene IGHV3-21. The target xenoantigen remains undetermined, but several candidate targets have been proposed, including carbohydrate xenoantigens. New advancements in molecular modeling provide insight on the mechanism by which xenoantibodies bind to structurally related carbohydrates. SUMMARY: Genetic manipulation of porcine donors has significantly prolonged the survival of grafts placed into nonhuman primate recipients, but anti-nonGal xenoantibodies and thrombosis limit the ability of these grafts to function on a long-term basis. Recent developments defining pre-existing anti-nonGal xenoantibody levels, the restriction in the anti-nonGal xenoantibody response and the identification of key sites defining xenoantibody-carbohydrate interactions now provide the information necessary to develop new approaches to preventing xenoantibody-mediated rejection.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Anti-nonGal xenoantibodies are a major barrier to the survival of genetically modified porcine xenografts. This review summarizes the contribution of anti-nonGal xenoantibodies to the activation of porcine endothelial cells and graft rejection, and further provides an update on recent advancements in defining the unique features of anti-nonGal xenoantibody structure. RECENT FINDINGS: Anti-nonGal xenoantibodies pre-exist at low levels in humans and nonhuman primates, and are notably absent in neonates. Exposure of nonhuman primates to alpha1,3-galactosyltransferase gene knockout endothelial cells initiates an induced xenoantibody response that is restricted and encoded by the germline immunoglobulin heavy chain gene IGHV3-21. The target xenoantigen remains undetermined, but several candidate targets have been proposed, including carbohydrate xenoantigens. New advancements in molecular modeling provide insight on the mechanism by which xenoantibodies bind to structurally related carbohydrates. SUMMARY: Genetic manipulation of porcine donors has significantly prolonged the survival of grafts placed into nonhuman primate recipients, but anti-nonGal xenoantibodies and thrombosis limit the ability of these grafts to function on a long-term basis. Recent developments defining pre-existing anti-nonGal xenoantibody levels, the restriction in the anti-nonGal xenoantibody response and the identification of key sites defining xenoantibody-carbohydrate interactions now provide the information necessary to develop new approaches to preventing xenoantibody-mediated rejection.
Authors: Pleunie P M Rood; Hao-Chih Tai; Hidetaka Hara; Cassandra Long; Mohamed Ezzelarab; Yih J Lin; Dirk J van der Windt; Jamie Busch; David Ayares; Jan N M Ijzermans; Roman F Wolf; Rizwan Manji; Leonard Bailey; David K C Cooper Journal: Transpl Int Date: 2007-09-10 Impact factor: 3.782
Authors: Mark B Nottle; Luke F S Beebe; Sharon J Harrison; Stephen M McIlfatrick; Rodney J Ashman; Phillip J O'Connell; Evelyn J Salvaris; Nella Fisicaro; Sandra Pommey; Peter J Cowan; Anthony J F d'Apice Journal: Xenotransplantation Date: 2007-07 Impact factor: 3.907
Authors: Sonia Schoonbroodt; Mieke Steukers; Malini Viswanathan; Nicolas Frans; Marie Timmermans; Anita Wehnert; Minh Nguyen; Robert Charles Ladner; René M Hoet Journal: J Immunol Date: 2008-11-01 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Akira Shimizu; Yosuke Hisashi; Kenji Kuwaki; Yau-Lin Tseng; Frank J M F Dor; Stuart L Houser; Simon C Robson; Henk-Jan Schuurman; David K C Cooper; David H Sachs; Kazuhiko Yamada; Robert B Colvin Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2008-05-08 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Mette Diswall; Jonas Angström; Henk-Jan Schuurman; Frank J M F Dor; Lennart Rydberg; Michael E Breimer Journal: Transplantation Date: 2007-11-27 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Mary Kearns-Jonker; Natasha Barteneva; Robert Mencel; Namath Hussain; Irina Shulkin; Alan Xu; Margaret Yew; Donald V Cramer Journal: BMC Immunol Date: 2007-03-12 Impact factor: 3.615
Authors: Soad M Saleh; Ranjit S Parhar; Reem S Al-Hejailan; Razan H Bakheet; Hala S Khaleel; Hanif G Khalak; Anason S Halees; Marya Z Zaidi; Brian F Meyer; Gisella P Yung; Jörg D Seebach; Walter Conca; Khalid S Khabar; Kate S Collison; Futwan A Al-Mohanna Journal: J Immunol Date: 2013-07-19 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: John M Stewart; Alice F Tarantal; Yan Chen; Nancy C Appleby; Tania I Fuentes; C Chang I Lee; Evelyn J Salvaris; Anthony J F d'Apice; Peter J Cowan; Mary Kearns-Jonker Journal: Xenotransplantation Date: 2014-03-17 Impact factor: 3.907
Authors: Donald G Harris; Kevin J Quinn; Siamak Dahi; Lars Burdorf; Agnes M Azimzadeh; Richard N Pierson Journal: Xenotransplantation Date: 2014-07-05 Impact factor: 3.907