BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Psychosocial stress has been widely studied as a risk factor for stroke and coronary heart disease (CHD) but little is known about the differential effects of stress on stroke and CHD risk by race and sex. Caregiving for a disabled spouse has been associated with increased mortality and CHD risk, but the association of caregiving strain with stroke and CHD risk across race and sex is unknown. METHODS: Participants in the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study who were providing in-home caregiving to a disabled spouse reported on caregiving strain (high, some, or none), depressive symptoms, social network, education, and age. Caregiving strain groups were compared on the Framingham Stroke Risk Score (N=716) and Framingham CHD Risk Score (N=607), which estimate the projected 10-year risk of incident stroke and ischemic heart disease, respectively. RESULTS: High caregiving strain was associated with a 23% higher covariate-adjusted estimated stroke risk (11.06% for caregivers with no strain versus 13.62% risk for high-strain caregivers). This association was stronger in men, particularly African American men with high caregiving strain (26.95% estimated 10-year stroke risk). Caregiving strain was not associated with CHD risk scores. CONCLUSIONS: Caregiving strain is significantly associated with higher estimated stroke risk with greatest effects for men, particularly African American men, providing caregiving to their wives. Male spouse caregivers may need special caregiving support. Prospective longitudinal studies should examine how sex and race may moderate the impact of stress on stroke and CHD risk.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:Psychosocial stress has been widely studied as a risk factor for stroke and coronary heart disease (CHD) but little is known about the differential effects of stress on stroke and CHD risk by race and sex. Caregiving for a disabled spouse has been associated with increased mortality and CHD risk, but the association of caregiving strain with stroke and CHD risk across race and sex is unknown. METHODS:Participants in the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study who were providing in-home caregiving to a disabled spouse reported on caregiving strain (high, some, or none), depressive symptoms, social network, education, and age. Caregiving strain groups were compared on the Framingham Stroke Risk Score (N=716) and Framingham CHD Risk Score (N=607), which estimate the projected 10-year risk of incident stroke and ischemic heart disease, respectively. RESULTS: High caregiving strain was associated with a 23% higher covariate-adjusted estimated stroke risk (11.06% for caregivers with no strain versus 13.62% risk for high-strain caregivers). This association was stronger in men, particularly African American men with high caregiving strain (26.95% estimated 10-year stroke risk). Caregiving strain was not associated with CHD risk scores. CONCLUSIONS: Caregiving strain is significantly associated with higher estimated stroke risk with greatest effects for men, particularly African American men, providing caregiving to their wives. Male spouse caregivers may need special caregiving support. Prospective longitudinal studies should examine how sex and race may moderate the impact of stress on stroke and CHD risk.
Authors: Mary Cushman; Ronald A Cantrell; Leslie A McClure; George Howard; Ronald J Prineas; Claudia S Moy; Ella M Temple; Virginia J Howard Journal: Ann Neurol Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 10.422
Authors: Virginia J Howard; Mary Cushman; Leavonne Pulley; Camilo R Gomez; Rodney C Go; Ronald J Prineas; Andra Graham; Claudia S Moy; George Howard Journal: Neuroepidemiology Date: 2005-06-29 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: Wayne Rosamond; Katherine Flegal; Gary Friday; Karen Furie; Alan Go; Kurt Greenlund; Nancy Haase; Michael Ho; Virginia Howard; Brett Kissela; Bret Kissela; Steven Kittner; Donald Lloyd-Jones; Mary McDermott; James Meigs; Claudia Moy; Graham Nichol; Christopher J O'Donnell; Veronique Roger; John Rumsfeld; Paul Sorlie; Julia Steinberger; Thomas Thom; Sylvia Wasserthiel-Smoller; Yuling Hong Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-12-28 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Kimberly J Salaycik; Margaret Kelly-Hayes; Alexa Beiser; Anh-Hoa Nguyen; Stephen M Brady; Carlos S Kase; Philip A Wolf Journal: Stroke Date: 2006-11-30 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Richard Schulz; Randy S Hebert; Mary Amanda Dew; Stephanie L Brown; Michael F Scheier; Scott R Beach; Sara J Czaja; Lynn M Martire; David Coon; Kenneth M Langa; Laura N Gitlin; Alan B Stevens; Linda Nichols Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2007-02
Authors: Hong Li; Bethel Ann Powers; Bernadette Mazurek Melnyk; Robert McCann; Christina Koulouglioti; Elizabeth Anson; Joyce A Smith; Yinglin Xia; Susan Glose; Xin Tu Journal: Res Nurs Health Date: 2012-06-27 Impact factor: 2.228
Authors: Lauren T Ptomey; Eric D Vidoni; Esteban Montenegro-Montenegro; Michael A Thompson; Joseph R Sherman; Anna M Gorczyca; Jerry L Greene; Richard A Washburn; Joseph E Donnelly Journal: J Aging Phys Act Date: 2019-09-01 Impact factor: 1.961
Authors: V Shahly; S Chatterji; M J Gruber; A Al-Hamzawi; J Alonso; L H Andrade; M C Angermeyer; R Bruffaerts; B Bunting; J M Caldas-de-Almeida; G de Girolamo; P de Jonge; S Florescu; O Gureje; J M Haro; H R Hinkov; C Hu; E G Karam; J-P Lépine; D Levinson; M E Medina-Mora; J Posada-Villa; N A Sampson; J K Trivedi; M C Viana; R C Kessler Journal: Psychol Med Date: 2012-08-09 Impact factor: 7.723
Authors: Andrea Leigh Stewart; Emma Barinas-Mitchell; Karen A Matthews; Samar R El Khoudary; Jared W Magnani; Elizabeth A Jackson; Maria M Brooks Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2019 Nov/Dec Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Lauren T Ptomey; Amanda N Szabo-Reed; Eric D Vidoni; Richard A Washburn; Anna M Gorczyca; Todd D Little; Jaehoon Lee; Brian C Helsel; Kristine N Williams; Joseph E Donnelly Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2020-09-23 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Roland von Känel; Paul J Mills; Joel E Dimsdale; Michael G Ziegler; Matthew A Allison; Thomas L Patterson; Sonia Ancoli-Israel; Christopher Pruitt; Igor Grant; Brent T Mausbach Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2020-10-15 Impact factor: 6.053