Literature DB >> 20075179

Newborn screening for galactosemia: a review of 5 years of data and audit of a revised reporting approach.

Dennis E Freer1, Can Ficicioglu, David Finegold.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Availability of the galactose-1-phosphate uridyltransferase (GALT) assay for newborn (NB) screening has improved identification of classic galactosemia. Previously defined critical cutoffs for total galactose (Gal), typically 1.110 mmol/L (20 mg/dL), are still in use in laboratories measuring total Gal for the diagnosis of nonclassic galactosemias. Urgent notification/referral to a treatment center follows, although few of the NBs will need treatment.
METHODS: We reviewed all NB galactosemia-screening results and their corresponding clinical outcomes over a 5-year period (first phase, 1.32 x 10(6) NBs) and then over a 2-year period (second phase, 274 960 NBs). Each NB was screened for Gal and GALT. When Gal was increased and/or GALT was deficient, testing for percentage galactose-1-phosphate and/or DNA testing for common GALT mutations were performed.
RESULTS: Of 209 reported positive results, 89% did not indicate GALT deficiency. These non-GALT-deficient results represented mostly clinically benign cases with a Gal threshold of > or = 1.110 mmol/L (> or = 20 mg/dL). The positive predictive value of a GALT cutoff of < or = 40 micromol/L was 83%. After a protocol change that redefined a critical result as a GALT value < or = 40 micromol/L and/or a Gal value > or = 1.665 mmol/L (> or = 30 mg/dL), results were monitored for an additional 2 years. The new protocol dramatically reduced the number of urgent calls/referrals and reduced the total number of referrals by nearly half.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of a GALT cutoff of < or = 40 micromol/L/L and a Gal cutoff of > or = 1.665 mmol/L (> or = 30 mg/dL) for urgent notification/referral dramatically reduces false positives and unnecessary follow-up, thereby reducing the stress on healthcare resources.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20075179     DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2009.135947

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  5 in total

1.  Galactosemia screening with low false-positive recall rate: the Swedish experience.

Authors:  Annika Ohlsson; Claes Guthenberg; Ulrika von Döbeln
Journal:  JIMD Rep       Date:  2011-09-06

Review 2.  Appropriateness of newborn screening for classic galactosaemia: a systematic review.

Authors:  L Varela-Lema; L Paz-Valinas; G Atienza-Merino; R Zubizarreta-Alberdi; R Vizoso Villares; M López-García
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2016-04-26       Impact factor: 4.982

3.  Newborn screening for galactosemia in the United States: looking back, looking around, and looking ahead.

Authors:  Brook M Pyhtila; Kelly A Shaw; Samantha E Neumann; Judith L Fridovich-Keil
Journal:  JIMD Rep       Date:  2014-04-10

4.  A case of galactosemia misdiagnosed as cow's milk intolerance.

Authors:  Roberto Della Casa; Carla Ungaro; Emma Acampora; Claudio Pignata; Pietro Vajro; Mariacarolina Salerno; Francesca Santamaria; Giancarlo Parenti
Journal:  Ital J Pediatr       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 2.638

Review 5.  Inborn Errors of Metabolism in the Era of Untargeted Metabolomics and Lipidomics.

Authors:  Israa T Ismail; Megan R Showalter; Oliver Fiehn
Journal:  Metabolites       Date:  2019-10-21
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.