Literature DB >> 20074694

Outcome of ligation of the inferior vena cava in the modern era.

Patrick S Sullivan1, Christopher J Dente, Snehal Patel, Matthew Carmichael, Jahnavi K Srinivasan, Amy D Wyrzykowski, Jeffrey M Nicholas, Jeffrey P Salomone, Walter L Ingram, Gary A Vercruysse, Grace S Rozycki, David V Feliciano.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ligation of the significantly injured infrarenal inferior vena cava (IVC) is an accepted practice in the setting of damage control surgery. This is a report of inpatient management, outcomes, and long-term follow-up in 25 patients after IVC ligation.
METHODS: The records of patients with injuries to the IVC treated in an urban level I trauma center from 1995 to 2008 were reviewed. Demographics, injury severity, and outcome data were recorded. In addition, outpatient records were reviewed and telephone interviews were conducted to assess for the presence and severity of long-term sequelae.
RESULTS: One hundred patients had IVC injuries, and 25 (25%) underwent ligation. Location of injury was infrarenal in 54 patients, suprarenal in 21, retrohepatic in 15, and suprahepatic in 10. Twenty-two of 54 (41%) injuries to the infrarenal IVC and 3 of 21 (14%) injuries to the suprarenal IVC were ligated. Patients who underwent ligation had a significantly higher Injury Severity Score (ISS) (22 vs 15, P < .001), a higher transfusion requirement (26 U vs 12 U, P < .001), a longer hospital length of stay (78 days vs 26 days, P = .02), a longer intensive care unit length of stay (24 days vs 9 days, P < .001), and a higher mortality (59% vs 21%, P < .001). Ten of 13 early survivors of infrarenal IVC ligation received early below knee fasciotomy. Three other patients with normal compartment pressures were treated expectantly without development of a compartment syndrome. The 1 survivor of suprarenal ligation had below knee fasciotomies and had normal renal function by 1 month post injury, despite an initial creatinine elevation from .7 mg/dL to 3.2 mg/dL. Ten (40%) patients with IVC ligation survived to hospital discharge (9 infrarenal, 1 suprarenal), and long-term follow-up data are available in 8 patients (7 infrarenal, 1 suprarenal). At an average of 42 months (11-117 months), no patient has significant lower extremity edema or dysfunction.
CONCLUSIONS: (1) Ligation of the infrarenal IVC is an acceptable damage control technique, although it remains associated with a high mortality. Ligation of the suprarenal IVC may be done, if necessary, although few survivors of this technique exist. (2) Early fasciotomy is generally required, but occasional patients may be treated expectantly, based on measurements of compartment pressures. (3) Long-term sequelae in survivors of IVC ligation for trauma are rare. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20074694     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.05.013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  15 in total

1.  MDCT of complications and common postoperative findings following penetrating torso trauma.

Authors:  David Dreizin; Uttam K Bodanapally; Felipe Munera
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2015-05-27

2.  Inferior Vena Cava Repair Using Serosal Patch of Small Bowel: An Experimental Study.

Authors:  Hossein Hodjati; Ahmad Hoseinzadeh; Seyed Masoud Mousavi; Seifollah Dehghani Nazhavi; Viginda Kumar; Maryam Sehhatpour
Journal:  Bull Emerg Trauma       Date:  2017-01

3.  Management of intra-abdominal vascular injury in trauma laparotomy: a South African experience.

Authors:  Ross Weale; Victor Kong; Vassil Manchev; Wanda Bekker; George Oosthuizen; Petra Brysiewicz; Grant Laing; John Bruce; Damian Clarke
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 2.089

4.  The use of biological grafts for reconstruction of the inferior vena cava is a safe and valid alternative: results in 32 patients in a single institution.

Authors:  Carlo Pulitanó; Michael Crawford; Phong Ho; James Gallagher; David Joseph; Michael Stephen; Charbel Sandroussi
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 3.647

5.  What happens after they survive? The role of anticoagulants and antiplatelets in IVC injuries.

Authors:  Allyson M Hynes; Dane R Scantling; Shyam Murali; Bradford C Bormann; Jasmeet S Paul; Patrick M Reilly; Mark J Seamon; Niels D Martin
Journal:  Trauma Surg Acute Care Open       Date:  2022-06-20

6.  Catheter-based endovascular damage-control (CDET): current status and future directions.

Authors:  Paula Ferrada; Rahul J Anand; Michel Aboutanos; Rao Ivatury
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 7.  Contemporary Strategies in the Management of Civilian Abdominal Vascular Trauma.

Authors:  Georgios Karaolanis; Dimitrios Moris; C Cameron McCoy; Diamantis I Tsilimigras; Sotirios Georgopoulos; Chris Bakoyiannis
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2018-02-19

Review 8.  WSES position paper on vascular emergency surgery.

Authors:  Bruno Monteiro T Pereira; Osvaldo Chiara; Fabio Ramponi; Dieter G Weber; Stefania Cimbanassi; Belinda De Simone; Korana Musicki; Guilherme Vieira Meirelles; Fausto Catena; Luca Ansaloni; Federico Coccolini; Massimo Sartelli; Salomone Di Saverio; Cino Bendinelli; Gustavo Pereira Fraga
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 9.  Management of Peripheral and Truncal Venous Injuries.

Authors:  Triantafillos G Giannakopoulos; Efthymios D Avgerinos
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2017-08-24

10.  Staged reconstruction of the inferior vena cava after gunshot injury.

Authors:  Nathan M Droz; John K Bini; Kamran A Jafree; John H Matsuura
Journal:  J Vasc Surg Cases Innov Tech       Date:  2017-07-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.