Literature DB >> 20073561

Ergonomic evaluation and guidelines for use of the daVinci Robot system.

Matthew M Lux1, Matthew Marshall, Erdal Erturk, Jean V Joseph.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The daVinci Robot system has been widely lauded for its improved ergonomic characteristics when compared with the pure laparoscopic technique. Our goal in this study was to assess for the existence of guidelines to maximize the ergonomic benefits of the daVinci system. We also compared the surgeon's console with the recommendations of similar workstations.
METHODS: A literature review of seated ergonomics was performed to identify recommendations for work areas similar to the robotic system, where prolong seating is necessary. An upper body biomechanics and ergonomic expert was consulted to evaluate the daVinci system and aid in the formation of ergonomic positioning guidelines. Link-length proportions were used to evaluate size constraints of potential robot operators.
RESULTS: No published guidelines exist for proper positioning using the daVinci surgeon console. There are, however, several Occupational Safety and Health Administration workstation guidelines as well as microscope ergonomic guidelines. The use of link-length proportions showed that the surgeon console allows a comfortable posture for individuals with height between 64 and 73 inches. Review of the microscope ergonomics literature indicates that a neutral vertical seating position has been associated with decreased strain and musculoskeletal disorders.
CONCLUSIONS: The body mechanics of the daVinci robot system best mimics that of microscopy. Future surgeon console modifications could emulate those reported in the microscope ergonomic literature, where a neutral vertical position has been recommended. This may help avoid potential musculoskeletal disorders similar to those previously seen with microscopy usage. Guidelines are suggested to optimize the surgeon's console position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20073561     DOI: 10.1089/end.2009.0197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  15 in total

1.  A query on da Vinci robot console preferences: insights for the novice surgeon.

Authors:  Igor Sorokin; Jeffrey A Cadeddu
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2016-11-15

2.  Surgeons' physical discomfort and symptoms during robotic surgery: a comprehensive ergonomic survey study.

Authors:  G I Lee; M R Lee; I Green; M Allaf; M R Marohn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Musculoskeletal pain among surgeons performing minimally invasive surgery: a systematic review.

Authors:  Tina Dalager; Karen Søgaard; Katrine Tholstrup Bech; Ole Mogensen; Pernille Tine Jensen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Ergonomics and Musculoskeletal Health of the Surgeon.

Authors:  Andrew T Schlussel; Justin A Maykel
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2019-08-22

5.  Robotic Inguinal vs Transabdominal Laparoscopic Inguinal Hernia Repair: The RIVAL Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Ajita S Prabhu; Alfredo Carbonell; William Hope; Jeremy Warren; Rana Higgins; Brian Jacob; Jeffrey Blatnik; Ivy Haskins; Hemasat Alkhatib; Luciano Tastaldi; Aldo Fafaj; Chao Tu; Michael J Rosen
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 14.766

6.  Ergonomics of minimally invasive surgery: an analysis of muscle effort and fatigue in the operating room between laparoscopic and robotic surgery.

Authors:  Priscila R Armijo; Chun-Kai Huang; Robin High; Melissa Leon; Ka-Chun Siu; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-10-19       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Physician pain and discomfort during minimally invasive gynecologic cancer surgery.

Authors:  Megan E McDonald; Pedro T Ramirez; Mark F Munsell; Marilyn Greer; William M Burke; Wendel T Naumann; Michael Frumovitz
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 8.  Surgical ergonomics for urologists: a practical guide.

Authors:  Andrew T Gabrielson; Marisa M Clifton; Christian P Pavlovich; Michael J Biles; Mitchell Huang; Jacqueline Agnew; Phillip M Pierorazio; Brian R Matlaga; Petar Bajic; Zeyad R Schwen
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 14.432

9.  An Ergonomic Assessment Of Four Different Donor Nephrectomy Approaches For The Surgeons And Their Assistants.

Authors:  Baptiste Marçon; Willy Ngueyon Sime; Francis Guillemin; Nicolas Hubert; François Lagrange; Céline Huselstein; Jacques Hubert
Journal:  Res Rep Urol       Date:  2019-09-27

10.  Feasibility and acceptance of a robotic surgery ergonomic training program.

Authors:  Jason Franasiak; Renatta Craven; Prithima Mosaly; Paola A Gehrig
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2014 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.