PURPOSE: We evaluated the associations of statins and serum cholesterol with PSA to understand whether the inverse associations of statins and low cholesterol with aggressive prostate cancer are explained by detection bias. METHODS: We analyzed data from 2,574 men aged > or =40 years without prostate cancer in The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2001-2004. We estimated multivariable-adjusted geometric mean PSA by statin use and cholesterol quintiles. To limit the influence of correlates of statin use and cholesterol on PSA, we stratified by comorbidities. RESULTS: Statin users had a non-statistically significantly lower PSA than non-users (0.90 vs. 0.95 ng/mL, p = 0.22), especially in men without comorbidities (n = 1,680; 0.86 vs. 0.99 ng/mL p = 0.02). In men with comorbidities, statin users had a non-statistically significantly higher PSA than non-users (0.91 vs. 0.83 ng/mL, p = 0.14). Men with lower cholesterol had lower PSA (bottom vs. top quintile: 0.92, 1.02 ng/mL, p-trend = 0.06). CONCLUSION: Statin users and men with lower cholesterol may have lower PSA. If so, the probability of detecting asymptomatic prostate cancer might be lower at present, but these cases might be more likely to be diagnosed at an advanced stage in the future. Thus, PSA-associated bias is unlikely to explain the inverse association of statins with advanced prostate cancer.
PURPOSE: We evaluated the associations of statins and serum cholesterol with PSA to understand whether the inverse associations of statins and low cholesterol with aggressive prostate cancer are explained by detection bias. METHODS: We analyzed data from 2,574 men aged > or =40 years without prostate cancer in The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2001-2004. We estimated multivariable-adjusted geometric mean PSA by statin use and cholesterol quintiles. To limit the influence of correlates of statin use and cholesterol on PSA, we stratified by comorbidities. RESULTS: Statin users had a non-statistically significantly lower PSA than non-users (0.90 vs. 0.95 ng/mL, p = 0.22), especially in men without comorbidities (n = 1,680; 0.86 vs. 0.99 ng/mL p = 0.02). In men with comorbidities, statin users had a non-statistically significantly higher PSA than non-users (0.91 vs. 0.83 ng/mL, p = 0.14). Men with lower cholesterol had lower PSA (bottom vs. top quintile: 0.92, 1.02 ng/mL, p-trend = 0.06). CONCLUSION: Statin users and men with lower cholesterol may have lower PSA. If so, the probability of detecting asymptomatic prostate cancer might be lower at present, but these cases might be more likely to be diagnosed at an advanced stage in the future. Thus, PSA-associated bias is unlikely to explain the inverse association of statins with advanced prostate cancer.
Authors: Elizabeth A Platz; Cathee Till; Phyllis J Goodman; Howard L Parnes; William D Figg; Demetrius Albanes; Marian L Neuhouser; Eric A Klein; Ian M Thompson; Alan R Kristal Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2009-11-03 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Robert J Hamilton; Kenneth C Goldberg; Elizabeth A Platz; Stephen J Freedland Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2008-10-28 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Gary D Friedman; E Dawn Flick; Natalia Udaltsova; James Chan; Charles P Quesenberry; Laurel A Habel Journal: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf Date: 2008-01 Impact factor: 2.890
Authors: Eric J Jacobs; Carmen Rodriguez; Elizabeth B Bain; Yiting Wang; Michael J Thun; Eugenia E Calle Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2007-10-30 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: E Dawn Flick; Laurel A Habel; K Arnold Chan; Stephen K Van Den Eeden; Virginia P Quinn; Reina Haque; Endel J Orav; John D Seeger; Marianne C Sadler; Charles P Quesenberry; Barbara Sternfeld; Steven J Jacobsen; Rachel A Whitmer; Bette J Caan Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2007-10-30 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Wildon R Farwell; Leonard W D'Avolio; Richard E Scranton; Elizabeth V Lawler; J Michael Gaziano Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2011-04-15 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Richard A Miller; David E Harrison; C M Astle; Joseph A Baur; Angela Rodriguez Boyd; Rafael de Cabo; Elizabeth Fernandez; Kevin Flurkey; Martin A Javors; James F Nelson; Carlos J Orihuela; Scott Pletcher; Zelton Dave Sharp; David Sinclair; Joseph W Starnes; J Erby Wilkinson; Nancy L Nadon; Randy Strong Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2010-10-25 Impact factor: 6.053
Authors: Byron H Lee; Margaret G Taylor; Peggy Robinet; Jonathan D Smith; Jessica Schweitzer; Ephraim Sehayek; Sara M Falzarano; Cristina Magi-Galluzzi; Eric A Klein; Angela H Ting Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2012-12-11 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Emma H Allott; Ilona Csizmadi; Lauren E Howard; Roberto L Muller; Daniel M Moreira; Gerald L Andriole; Claus G Roehrborn; Stephen J Freedland Journal: BJU Int Date: 2019-09-27 Impact factor: 5.588
Authors: Jay H Fowke; Saundra S Motley; Daniel A Barocas; Michael S Cookson; Raoul Concepcion; Susan Byerly; Joseph A Smith Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2010-12-19 Impact factor: 2.506
Authors: Monika Eichholzer; Aline Richard; Holly L Nicastro; Elizabeth A Platz; Jakob Linseisen; Sabine Rohrmann Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2014-01-25 Impact factor: 2.506