Literature DB >> 20072806

Nonlinear cross-frequency interactions in primary auditory cortex spectrotemporal receptive fields: a Wiener-Volterra analysis.

Martin Pienkowski1, Jos J Eggermont.   

Abstract

The effects of nonlinear interactions between different sound frequencies on the responses of neurons in primary auditory cortex (AI) have only been investigated using two-tone paradigms. Here we stimulated with relatively dense, Poisson-distributed trains of tone pips (with frequency ranges spanning five octaves, 16 frequencies /octave, and mean rates of 20 or 120 pips /s), and examined within-frequency (or auto-frequency) and cross-frequency interactions in three types of AI unit responses by computing second-order "Poisson-Wiener" auto- and cross-kernels. Units were classified on the basis of their spectrotemporal receptive fields (STRFs) as "double-peaked", "single-peaked" or "peak-valley". Second-order interactions were investigated between the two bands of excitatory frequencies on double-peaked STRFs, between an excitatory band and various non-excitatory bands on single-peaked STRFs, and between an excitatory band and an inhibitory sideband on peak-valley STRFs. We found that auto-frequency interactions (i.e., those within a single excitatory band) were always characterized by a strong depression of (first-order) excitation that decayed with the interstimulus lag up to approximately 200 ms. That depression was weaker in cross-frequency compared to auto-frequency interactions for approximately 25% of dual-peaked STRFs, evidence of "combination sensitivity" for the two bands. Non-excitatory and inhibitory frequencies (on single-peaked and peak-valley STRFs, respectively) typically weakly depressed the excitatory response at short interstimulus lags (<50 ms), but weakly facilitated it at longer lags ( approximately 50-200 ms). Both the depression and especially the facilitation were stronger for interactions with inhibitory frequencies rather than just non-excitatory ones. Finally, facilitation in single-peaked and peak-valley units decreased with increasing stimulus density. Our results indicate that the strong combination sensitivity and cross-frequency facilitation suggested by previous two-tone-paradigm studies are much less pronounced when using more temporally-dense stimuli.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20072806     DOI: 10.1007/s10827-009-0209-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comput Neurosci        ISSN: 0929-5313            Impact factor:   1.621


  41 in total

1.  Rapid task-related plasticity of spectrotemporal receptive fields in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Jonathan Fritz; Shihab Shamma; Mounya Elhilali; David Klein
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-28       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Tuning for spectro-temporal modulations as a mechanism for auditory discrimination of natural sounds.

Authors:  Sarah M N Woolley; Thane E Fremouw; Anne Hsu; Frédéric E Theunissen
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-09-04       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Selectivity for temporal characteristics of sound and interaural time difference of auditory midbrain neurons in the grassfrog: a system theoretical approach.

Authors:  W J Melssen; W J Epping
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.208

4.  The consequences of response nonlinearities for interpretation of spectrotemporal receptive fields.

Authors:  G Björn Christianson; Maneesh Sahani; Jennifer F Linden
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Spectrotemporal receptive fields during spindling and non-spindling epochs in cat primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  T Britvina; J J Eggermont
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2008-04-29       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Effects of adaptation on spectrotemporal receptive fields in primary auditory cortex.

Authors:  Martin Pienkowski; Jos J Eggermont
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2009-08-26       Impact factor: 1.837

7.  Spectro-temporal receptive fields of auditory neurons in the grassfrog. III. Analysis of the stimulus-event relation for natural stimuli.

Authors:  A M Aertsen; J H Olders; P I Johannesma
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.086

8.  Specificity of combination-sensitive neurons for processing of complex biosonar signals in auditory cortex of the mustached bat.

Authors:  N Suga; W E O'Neill; K Kujirai; T Manabe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  The spectro-temporal receptive field. A functional characteristic of auditory neurons.

Authors:  A M Aertsen; P I Johannesma
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.086

10.  Feature analysis of natural sounds in the songbird auditory forebrain.

Authors:  K Sen; F E Theunissen; A J Doupe
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  8 in total

1.  Octave effect in auditory attention.

Authors:  Tobias Borra; Huib Versnel; Chantal Kemner; A John van Opstal; Raymond van Ee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Human thalamus regulates cortical activity via spatially specific and structurally constrained phase-amplitude coupling.

Authors:  Mahsa Malekmohammadi; W Jeff Elias; Nader Pouratian
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 3.  Hierarchical representations in the auditory cortex.

Authors:  Tatyana O Sharpee; Craig A Atencio; Christoph E Schreiner
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2011-06-23       Impact factor: 6.627

Review 4.  Temporal coherence and attention in auditory scene analysis.

Authors:  Shihab A Shamma; Mounya Elhilali; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 13.837

Review 5.  Nonlinear System Identification of Neural Systems from Neurophysiological Signals.

Authors:  Fei He; Yuan Yang
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 3.590

6.  Forward suppression in the auditory cortex is frequency-specific.

Authors:  Chris Scholes; Alan R Palmer; Christian J Sumner
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 7.  Models of Neuronal Stimulus-Response Functions: Elaboration, Estimation, and Evaluation.

Authors:  Arne F Meyer; Ross S Williamson; Jennifer F Linden; Maneesh Sahani
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2017-01-12

8.  Input-Specific Gain Modulation by Local Sensory Context Shapes Cortical and Thalamic Responses to Complex Sounds.

Authors:  Ross S Williamson; Misha B Ahrens; Jennifer F Linden; Maneesh Sahani
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 17.173

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.