Literature DB >> 20072031

Radiostereometric analysis of postoperative motion after application of dynesys dynamic posterior stabilization system for treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis.

Amir H Fayyazi1, Nathaniel R Ordway, Soo-An Park, Bruce E Fredrickson, Kenneth Yonemura, Hansen A Yuan.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective case series
OBJECTIVE: This was designed to precisely measure motion after posterior dynamic stabilization using Dynesys instrumentation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The Dynesys posterior dynamic stabilization system, which stabilizes the spinal segment while potentially decreasing the risk of adjacent segment disease, is undergoing evaluation by the US Food and Drug Administration for treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis without fusion. Evaluation of adjacent segment disease requires precise characterization of motion on the surgical level. Unfortunately, routine clinical radiographic techniques are imprecise and unreliable for full characterization of spinal segment motion. Radiostereometric analysis, which is very precise and reliable for in vivo measurement of motion, was used to examine spinal segment motion after dynamic stabilization with Dynesys.
METHODS: Six patients (age 59+/-7 y) underwent posterior decompression followed by posterior stabilization using Dynesys instrumentation (4 one-level, 2 two-levels). Three to 5 tantalum beads were placed in each vertebral body. Postoperative biplanar radiographs were obtained in flexion, extension, right, and left lateral bending, and 3-dimensional reconstruction was performed using radiostereometric analysis at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months postoperatively. The translations and rotations of the superior vertebral body were measured relative to the inferior vertebral body.
RESULTS: Over the 24-month follow-up period, mean flexion, extension, left, and right lateral bending of the motion segments were noted to be 1.0 degrees, 2.4 degrees, 0.6 degrees, and 0.6 degrees or less, respectively. There were no statistically significant changes in the degree of motion. During follow-up, no significant changes in neutral position of the device were noted in any of the 3 planes, and minimal translation was noted in the postoperative period.
CONCLUSIONS: The Dynesys dynamic instrumentation system seems to stabilize degenerative spondylolisthesis. As expected in the degenerative lumbar spine, the segmental motion of the implanted level in this study was limited and considerably less than normal spinal motion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20072031     DOI: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181a4bb0b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Spinal Disord Tech        ISSN: 1536-0652


  5 in total

1.  Comparison between posterior dynamic stabilization and posterior lumbar interbody fusion in the treatment of degenerative disc disease: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Haodong Fei; Jiang Xu; Shouguo Wang; Yue Xie; Feng Ji; Yongyi Xu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2015-06-02       Impact factor: 2.359

2.  An in vivo kinematic comparison of dynamic lumbar stabilization to lumbar discectomy and posterior lumbar fusion using radiostereometric analysis.

Authors:  Soo-An Park; Amir H Fayyazi; Kenneth S Yonemura; Bruce E Fredrickson; Nathaniel R Ordway
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2012-12-01

3.  Short term outcome of posterior dynamic stabilization system in degenerative lumbar diseases.

Authors:  Mingyuan Yang; Chao Li; Ziqiang Chen; Yushu Bai; Ming Li
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 4.  RSA in Spine: A Review.

Authors:  Ali Humadi; Sulaf Dawood; Klas Halldin; Brian Freeman
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-07-28

5.  Long-Term Outcome of Dynesys Dynamic Stabilization for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis.

Authors:  Yang Zhang; Zhi-Cheng Zhang; Fang Li; Tian-Sheng Sun; Jian-Lin Shan; Kai Guan; Guang-Min Zhao; Li-Zhi Zhang
Journal:  Chin Med J (Engl)       Date:  2018-11-05       Impact factor: 2.628

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.