Literature DB >> 20071701

Comparison of ustekinumab and etanercept for moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Christopher E M Griffiths1, Bruce E Strober, Peter van de Kerkhof, Vincent Ho, Roseanne Fidelus-Gort, Newman Yeilding, Cynthia Guzzo, Yichuan Xia, Bei Zhou, Shu Li, Lisa T Dooley, Neil H Goldstein, Alan Menter.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Biologic agents offer a range of new therapeutic options for patients with psoriasis; however, the relative benefit-risk profiles of such therapies are not well known. We compared two biologic agents, ustekinumab (an interleukin-12 and interleukin-23 blocker) and etanercept (an inhibitor of tumor necrosis factor alpha), for the treatment of psoriasis.
METHODS: We randomly assigned 903 patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis to receive subcutaneous injections of either 45 or 90 mg of ustekinumab (at weeks 0 and 4) or high-dose etanercept (50 mg twice weekly for 12 weeks). The primary end point was the proportion of patients with at least 75% improvement in the psoriasis area-and-severity index (PASI) at week 12; a secondary end point was the proportion with cleared or minimal disease on the basis of the physician's global assessment. Assessors were unaware of the treatment assignments. The efficacy and safety of a crossover from etanercept to ustekinumab were evaluated after week 12.
RESULTS: There was at least 75% improvement in the PASI at week 12 in 67.5% of patients who received 45 mg of ustekinumab and 73.8% of patients who received 90 mg, as compared with 56.8% of those who received etanercept (P=0.01 and P<0.001, respectively). Similarly, 65.1% of patients who received 45 mg of ustekinumab and 70.6% of patients who received 90 mg of ustekinumab had cleared or minimal disease according to the physician's global assessment, as compared with 49.0% of those who received etanercept (P<0.001 for both comparisons). Among patients who did not have a response to etanercept, 48.9% had at least 75% improvement in the PASI within 12 weeks after crossover to ustekinumab. One or more adverse events occurred through week 12 in 66.0% of patients who received 45 mg of ustekinumab and 69.2% of patients who received 90 mg of ustekinumab and in 70.0% who received etanercept; 1.9%, 1.2%, and 1.2%, respectively, had serious adverse events. Safety patterns were similar before and after crossover from etanercept to ustekinumab.
CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of ustekinumab at a dose of 45 or 90 mg was superior to that of high-dose etanercept over a 12-week period in patients with psoriasis. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00454584.) 2010 Massachusetts Medical Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20071701     DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa0810652

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  N Engl J Med        ISSN: 0028-4793            Impact factor:   91.245


  198 in total

Review 1.  Inflammatory bone loss: pathogenesis and therapeutic intervention.

Authors:  Kurt Redlich; Josef S Smolen
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 84.694

2.  IBC's 22nd Annual Antibody Engineering and 9th Annual Antibody Therapeutics International Conferences and the 2011 Annual Meeting of The Antibody Society, December 5-8, 2011, San Diego, CA.

Authors:  Johan Nilvebrant; D Cameron Dunlop; Aroop Sircar; Thierry Wurch; Emilia Falkowska; Janice M Reichert; Gustavo Helguera; Emily C Piccione; Simon Brack; Sven Berger
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2012-03-01       Impact factor: 5.857

Review 3.  Application of quantitative pharmacology in development of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Mohammad Tabrizi; Cherryl Funelas; Hamza Suria
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2010-07-24       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 4.  [Biologics. New drugs, new adverse reactions].

Authors:  J C Prinz
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 0.751

5.  Topical delivery of siRNA-based spherical nucleic acid nanoparticle conjugates for gene regulation.

Authors:  Dan Zheng; David A Giljohann; David L Chen; Matthew D Massich; Xiao-Qi Wang; Hristo Iordanov; Chad A Mirkin; Amy S Paller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-07-06       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  [Psoriatic arthritis : Overview of drug therapy options and administration characteristics].

Authors:  F Behrens; D Thaçi; J Wollenhaupt; K Krüger
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 0.751

Review 7.  Biologic therapies in the treatment of psoriasis: a comprehensive evidence-based basic science and clinical review and a practical guide to tuberculosis monitoring.

Authors:  Raja K Sivamani; Heidi Goodarzi; Miki Shirakawa Garcia; Siba P Raychaudhuri; Lisa N Wehrli; Yoko Ono; Emanual Maverakis
Journal:  Clin Rev Allergy Immunol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 8.667

8.  Minimal disease activity in patients with psoriatic arthritis treated with ustekinumab: results from a 24-week real-world study.

Authors:  Maddalena Napolitano; Luisa Costa; Francesco Caso; Matteo Megna; Raffaele Scarpa; Nicola Balato; Fabio Ayala; Anna Balato
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2017-05-31       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 9.  Targeting Interleukin-23 in the Treatment of Noninfectious Uveitis.

Authors:  Kathryn L Pepple; Phoebe Lin
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2018-07-04       Impact factor: 12.079

Review 10.  Beyond TNF Inhibitors: New Pathways and Emerging Treatments for Psoriatic Arthritis.

Authors:  Ennio Lubrano; Fabio Massimo Perrotta
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 9.546

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.