Literature DB >> 20071495

Fidaxomicin: a macrocyclic antibiotic for the management of Clostridium difficile infection.

Karyn M Sullivan1, Linda M Spooner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of fidaxomicin for the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection. DATA SOURCES: Literature retrieval was accessed through MEDLINE (1966-January 2010) and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-January 2010) using the terms OPT-80, difimicin, PAR-101, fidaxomicin, tiacumicin, lipiarmycin, and Clostridium difficile. In addition, reference citations from publications identified were reviewed. STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION: All articles published in English that were identified from the data sources were evaluated and pertinent information was included. DATA SYNTHESIS: Fidaxomicin is an 18-membered macrocyclic antibiotic with activity against gram-positive aerobes and anaerobes, including C. difficile. Microbiologic studies comparing in vitro activity of fidaxomicin with that of metronidazole and vancomycin have shown good activity against all strains of C. difficile tested; however, minimum inhibitory concentrations were consistently lower for fidaxomicin. Studies showed that fidaxomicin lacks activity against gram-negative pathogens, thereby preserving normal gastrointestinal flora. Small pharmacokinetic trials have shown that fidaxomicin administration leads to low concentrations in plasma, high concentrations in stool, and a postantibiotic effect of greater than 24 hours, all of which are potentially advantageous characteristics for treating C. difficile infection. Data from 2 Phase 2A trials and 1 Phase 3 (multicenter, randomized, double-blind) trial suggest that fidaxomicin is effective for the treatment of mild-to-moderate C. difficile infection at a dose of 200 mg orally every 12 hours. Limited early results from the Phase 3 trial showed favorable outcomes for fidaxomicin when compared to oral vancomycin. Overall, fidaxomicin has been well tolerated to date.
CONCLUSIONS: The activity of fidaxomicin and limited clinical data suggest that it may have a future role in the treatment of mild-to-moderate C. difficile infection. The complete pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile, safety, and place in therapy have yet to be determined as trials comparing this agent to vancomycin are forthcoming.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20071495     DOI: 10.1345/aph.1M351

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Pharmacother        ISSN: 1060-0280            Impact factor:   3.154


  7 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of refractory and recurrent Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Christina M Surawicz; Jacob Alexander
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2011-04-19       Impact factor: 46.802

Review 2.  The potential for emerging therapeutic options for Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Harsh Mathur; Mary C Rea; Paul D Cotter; R Paul Ross; Colin Hill
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2014

Review 3.  Clostridium difficile infection.

Authors:  Latisha Heinlen; Jimmy D Ballard
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 2.378

4.  Management and prevention of recurrent clostridium difficile infection in patients after total joint arthroplasty: a review.

Authors:  Benjamin E Stein; William B Greenough; Simon C Mears
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2012-12

Review 5.  Toxin-specific antibodies for the treatment of Clostridium difficile: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Greg Hussack; Jamshid Tanha
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 4.546

6.  Treatment of first recurrence of Clostridium difficile infection: fidaxomicin versus vancomycin.

Authors:  Oliver A Cornely; Mark A Miller; Thomas J Louie; Derrick W Crook; Sherwood L Gorbach
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 9.079

7.  Dietary or supplemental fermentable fiber intake reduces the presence of Clostridium XI in mouse intestinal microbiota: The importance of higher fecal bacterial load and density.

Authors:  Wei Zheng; Kairui Wang; Yijun Sun; Shiu-Ming Kuo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.