Literature DB >> 20071119

Quantitative multivoxel proton chemical shift imaging of the breast.

Paul E Sijens1, Monique D Dorrius, Peter Kappert, Paul Baron, Ruud M Pijnappel, Matthijs Oudkerk.   

Abstract

The study of focal pathology by single-voxel magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) is hampered by the impossibility to study tissue heterogeneity or compare the metabolite signals in breast lesion directly to those in unaffected tissue. Multivoxel MRS studies, while potentially allowing for truly quantitative tissue characterization, have up to now also been far from quantitative with, for example, the signal-to-noise ratio of the choline (Cho) signal serving as measure of tumor activity. Shown in this study is that in a standard clinical setting with a regular 1.5-T magnetic resonance scanner, it is possible to perform quantitative multivoxel MRS. With the use of literature values for the T1 and T2 relaxation times of Cho and water in fibroglandular breast tissue and tumors, one can determine the concentrations of Cho in different tumor compartments and surrounding tissues in two brief multivoxel MRS measurements. This opens excellent perspectives to quantitative diagnostic and follow-up studies of focal pathology such as lesions suspected of breast cancer. Copyright 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20071119     DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2009.11.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 0730-725X            Impact factor:   2.546


  10 in total

1.  The added value of quantitative multi-voxel MR spectroscopy in breast magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  M D Dorrius; R M Pijnappel; M C van der Weide Jansen; L Jansen; P Kappert; M Oudkerk; P E Sijens
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Quantitative analysis of spatial averaging effect on chemical shift imaging SNR and noise coherence with k-space sampling schemes.

Authors:  Byeong-Yeul Lee; Xiao-Hong Zhu; Wei Chen
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-03-31       Impact factor: 2.546

3.  MR spectroscopy of breast cancer for assessing early treatment response: Results from the ACRIN 6657 MRS trial.

Authors:  Patrick J Bolan; Eunhee Kim; Benjamin A Herman; Gillian M Newstead; Mark A Rosen; Mitchell D Schnall; Etta D Pisano; Paul T Weatherall; Elizabeth A Morris; Constance D Lehman; Michael Garwood; Michael T Nelson; Douglas Yee; Sandra M Polin; Laura J Esserman; Constantine A Gatsonis; Gregory J Metzger; David C Newitt; Savannah C Partridge; Nola M Hylton
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 4.  Proton MR spectroscopy in the breast: Technical innovations and clinical applications.

Authors:  Reza Fardanesh; Maria Adele Marino; Daly Avendano; Doris Leithner; Katja Pinker; Sunitha B Thakur
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-03-07       Impact factor: 4.813

5.  Quantitative mapping of total choline in healthy human breast using proton echo planar spectroscopic imaging (PEPSI) at 3 Tesla.

Authors:  Chenguang Zhao; Patrick J Bolan; Melanie Royce; Navneeth Lakkadi; Steven Eberhardt; Laurel Sillerud; Sang-Joon Lee; Stefan Posse
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2012-07-10       Impact factor: 4.813

6.  Current and emerging quantitative magnetic resonance imaging methods for assessing and predicting the response of breast cancer to neoadjuvant therapy.

Authors:  Richard G Abramson; Lori R Arlinghaus; Jared A Weis; Xia Li; Adrienne N Dula; Eduard Y Chekmenev; Seth A Smith; Michael I Miga; Vandana G Abramson; Thomas E Yankeelov
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2012-10

Review 7.  In vivo proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy of breast cancer: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Jonathan K P Begley; Thomas W Redpath; Patrick J Bolan; Fiona J Gilbert
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-04-19       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  Comparison of real-time water proton spectroscopy and echo-planar imaging sensitivity to the BOLD effect at 3 T and at 7 T.

Authors:  Yury Koush; Mark A Elliott; Frank Scharnowski; Klaus Mathiak
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Clinical Breast MR Using MRS or DWI: Who Is the Winner?

Authors:  Francesco Sardanelli; Luca Alessandro Carbonaro; Stefania Montemezzi; Carlo Cavedon; Rubina Manuela Trimboli
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 10.  In vivo MR spectroscopy for breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Uma Sharma; Naranamangalam Raghunathan Jagannathan
Journal:  BJR Open       Date:  2019-07-02
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.