Literature DB >> 20070959

The cost of being watched: Stroop interference increases under concomitant eye contact.

Laurence Conty1, David Gimmig, Clément Belletier, Nathalie George, Pascal Huguet.   

Abstract

Current models in social neuroscience advance that eye contact may automatically recruit cognitive resources. Here, we directly tested this hypothesis by evaluating the distracting strength of eye contact on concurrent visual processing in the well-known Stroop's paradigm. As expected, participants showed stronger Stroop interference under concomitant eye contact as compared to closed eyes. Two control experiments allowed ruling out low-level account of this effect as well as non-specific effect of the presence of open eyes. This suggests that refraining from processing eye contact is actually as difficult as refraining from word reading in the Stroop task. Crucially, the eye contact effect was obtained while gaze was not under the direct focus of attention and the participants were faced with another powerful distracter (the incongruent word) in the task at hand. Thus, there is a cost of being watched even in circumstances where the processing of direct gaze is strongly disfavored. The present results emphasize the crucial status of eye contact in human cognition. Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20070959     DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2009.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cognition        ISSN: 0010-0277


  25 in total

1.  Eyes on me: an fMRI study of the effects of social gaze on action control.

Authors:  Leonhard Schilbach; Simon B Eickhoff; Edna Cieslik; Nadim J Shah; Gereon R Fink; Kai Vogeley
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-22       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  The Mona Lisa effect: neural correlates of centered and off-centered gaze.

Authors:  Evgenia Boyarskaya; Alexandra Sebastian; Thomas Bauermann; Heiko Hecht; Oliver Tüscher
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Learning under your gaze: the mediating role of affective arousal between perceived direct gaze and memory performance.

Authors:  Terhi M Helminen; Tytti P Pasanen; Jari K Hietanen
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2015-02-05

4.  Choking under monitoring pressure: being watched by the experimenter reduces executive attention.

Authors:  Clément Belletier; Karen Davranche; Idriss S Tellier; Florence Dumas; Franck Vidal; Thierry Hasbroucq; Pascal Huguet
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-10

5.  Intentionally distracting: Working memory is disrupted by the perception of other agents attending to you - even without eye-gaze cues.

Authors:  Clara Colombatto; Benjamin van Buren; Brian J Scholl
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06

6.  The dual nature of eye contact: to see and to be seen.

Authors:  Aki Myllyneva; Jari K Hietanen
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 3.436

7.  Look at me, I'll remember you: the perception of self-relevant social cues enhances memory and right hippocampal activity.

Authors:  Laurence Conty; Julie Grèzes
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  Is mental effort exertion contagious?

Authors:  Kobe Desender; Sarah Beurms; Eva Van den Bussche
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-04

9.  Salient social cues are prioritized in autism spectrum disorders despite overall decrease in social attention.

Authors:  Coralie Chevallier; Pascal Huguet; Francesca Happé; Nathalie George; Laurence Conty
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2013-07

10.  Eye contact facilitates awareness of faces during interocular suppression.

Authors:  Timo Stein; Atsushi Senju; Marius V Peelen; Philipp Sterzer
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2011-02-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.