Literature DB >> 20070652

The REFLECT statement: reporting guidelines for Randomized Controlled Trials in livestock and food safety: explanation and elaboration.

J M Sargeant1, A M O'Connor, I A Gardner, J S Dickson, M E Torrence.   

Abstract

Concerns about the completeness and accuracy of reporting of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and the impact of poor reporting on decision making have been documented in the medical field over the past several decades. Experience from RCTs in human medicine would suggest that failure to report critical trial features can be associated with biased estimated effect measures, and there is evidence to suggest that similar biases occur in RCTs conducted in livestock populations. In response to these concerns, standardized guidelines for reporting RCTs were developed and implemented in human medicine. The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement was first published in 1996, with a revised edition published in 2001. The CONSORT statement consists of a 22-item checklist for reporting a RCT and a flow diagram to follow the number of participants at each stage of a trial. An explanation and elaboration document not only defines and discusses the importance of each of the items, but also provides examples of how this information could be supplied in a publication. Differences between human and livestock populations necessitate modifications to the CONSORT statement to maximize its usefulness for RCTs involving livestock. These have been addressed in an extension of the CONSORT statement titled the REFLECT statement: Methods and processes of creating reporting guidelines for randomized control trials for livestock and food safety. The modifications made for livestock trials specifically addressed the common use of group housing and group allocation to intervention in livestock studies; the use of deliberate challenge models in some trials and the common use of non-clinical outcomes, such as contamination with a foodborne pathogen. In addition, the REFLECT statement for RCTs in livestock populations proposed specific terms or further clarified terms as they pertained to livestock studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20070652     DOI: 10.1111/j.1863-2378.2009.01312.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Zoonoses Public Health        ISSN: 1863-1959            Impact factor:   2.702


  11 in total

1.  The use of systematic reviews and reporting guidelines to advance the implementation of the 3Rs.

Authors:  Marc T Avey; Nicole Fenwick; Gilly Griffin
Journal:  J Am Assoc Lab Anim Sci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 1.232

2.  Performance of multiple diagnostic methods in assessing the progression of bovine respiratory disease in calves challenged with infectious bovine rhinotracheitis virus and Mannheimia haemolytica1.

Authors:  Joaquin Baruch; Natalia Cernicchiaro; Charley A Cull; Kelly F Lechtenberg; Jason S Nickell; David G Renter
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-05-30       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Explanation and Elaboration Document for the STROBE-Vet Statement: Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology-Veterinary Extension.

Authors:  A M O'Connor; J M Sargeant; I R Dohoo; H N Erb; M Cevallos; M Egger; A K Ersbøll; S W Martin; L R Nielsen; D L Pearl; D U Pfeiffer; J Sanchez; M E Torrence; H Vigre; C Waldner; M P Ward
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 4.  A Rapid Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy of Slaughter and Processing Interventions to Control Non-Typhoidal Salmonella in Beef and Pork.

Authors:  Ian Young; Barbara J Wilhelm; Sarah Cahill; Rei Nakagawa; Patricia Desmarchelier; Andrijana Rajić
Journal:  J Food Prot       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.077

5.  A history of the evolution of guidelines for reporting medical research: the long road to the EQUATOR Network.

Authors:  Douglas G Altman; Iveta Simera
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 5.344

6.  A survey of the awareness, knowledge, policies and views of veterinary journal Editors-in-Chief on reporting guidelines for publication of research.

Authors:  Douglas Jc Grindlay; Rachel S Dean; Mary M Christopher; Marnie L Brennan
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2014-01-10       Impact factor: 2.741

7.  Methods and Processes of Developing the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology - Veterinary (STROBE-Vet) Statement.

Authors:  J M Sargeant; A M O'Connor; I R Dohoo; H N Erb; M Cevallos; M Egger; A K Ersbøll; S W Martin; L R Nielsen; D L Pearl; D U Pfeiffer; J Sanchez; M E Torrence; H Vigre; C Waldner; M P Ward
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2016-11-07       Impact factor: 3.333

8.  The effect of a hiding box on stress levels and body weight in Dutch shelter cats; a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  W J R van der Leij; L D A M Selman; J C M Vernooij; C M Vinke
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Quality of reporting of clinical trials in dogs and cats: An update.

Authors:  Jan M Sargeant; Mikayla Plishka; Audrey Ruple; Laura E Selmic; Sarah C Totton; Ellen R Vriezen
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 3.333

10.  Evaluation of 2 different treatment procedures after calving to improve harvesting of high-quantity and high-quality colostrum.

Authors:  F Sutter; S Borchardt; G M Schuenemann; E Rauch; M Erhard; W Heuwieser
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 4.034

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.