AIM: The simultaneous administration of irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and oxaliplatin (FOLFOXIRI) has been compared with standard 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in randomized trials in metastatic colorectal cancer patients. A superior efficacy of FOLFOXIRI has been reported by some authors, but others have failed to show any differences and do not recommend its use because of greater cost and toxicity. We performed a systematic review of the literature to analyse efficacy and toxicity of FOLFOXIRI. METHOD: Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to analyse dichotomous variables. Hazard ratios (HR) for progression and death were combined with an inverse variance method based on logarithmic conversion. A fixed-effect model and Mantel-Haenszel's method were used. Heterogeneity was tested with Cochrane's Q test and I(2) test. RESULTS: A significant increase in response rate (OR 2.04; P < 0.01) was associated with treatment by FOLFOXIRI and a benefit was also shown by the HR for progression (HR 0.72; P < 0.01) and death (HR 0.71; P < 0.01). Analysis for toxicity found a significant increase associated with FOLFOXIRI except for anaemia, fatigue and febrile neutropenia. CONCLUSION: FOLFOXIRI confers significant benefit in progression-free survival, survival, response and R0 resection rates but is more toxic compared with FOLFIRI.
AIM: The simultaneous administration of irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and oxaliplatin (FOLFOXIRI) has been compared with standard 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) in randomized trials in metastatic colorectal cancerpatients. A superior efficacy of FOLFOXIRI has been reported by some authors, but others have failed to show any differences and do not recommend its use because of greater cost and toxicity. We performed a systematic review of the literature to analyse efficacy and toxicity of FOLFOXIRI. METHOD: Odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were used to analyse dichotomous variables. Hazard ratios (HR) for progression and death were combined with an inverse variance method based on logarithmic conversion. A fixed-effect model and Mantel-Haenszel's method were used. Heterogeneity was tested with Cochrane's Q test and I(2) test. RESULTS: A significant increase in response rate (OR 2.04; P < 0.01) was associated with treatment by FOLFOXIRI and a benefit was also shown by the HR for progression (HR 0.72; P < 0.01) and death (HR 0.71; P < 0.01). Analysis for toxicity found a significant increase associated with FOLFOXIRI except for anaemia, fatigue and febrile neutropenia. CONCLUSION:FOLFOXIRI confers significant benefit in progression-free survival, survival, response and R0 resection rates but is more toxic compared with FOLFIRI.
Authors: Marlen Haderlein; Sebastian Lettmaier; Melanie Langheinrich; Axel Schmid; Sabine Semrau; Markus Hecht; Michael Beck; Daniela Schmidt; Robert Grützmann; Rainer Fietkau; Axel Denz Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2018-07-02 Impact factor: 2.571
Authors: Rafael Barreto; Giorgia Mandili; Frank A Witzmann; Francesco Novelli; Teresa A Zimmers; Andrea Bonetto Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2016-10-19 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Bojidar M Kojouharov; Craig M Brackett; Jean M Veith; Christopher P Johnson; Ilya I Gitlin; Ilia A Toshkov; Anatoli S Gleiberman; Andrei V Gudkov; Lyudmila G Burdelya Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2014-02-15