Literature DB >> 20070294

Simplified Bayesian sensitivity analysis for mismeasured and unobserved confounders.

P Gustafson1, L C McCandless, A R Levy, S Richardson.   

Abstract

We examine situations where interest lies in the conditional association between outcome and exposure variables, given potential confounding variables. Concern arises that some potential confounders may not be measured accurately, whereas others may not be measured at all. Some form of sensitivity analysis might be employed, to assess how this limitation in available data impacts inference. A Bayesian approach to sensitivity analysis is straightforward in concept: a prior distribution is formed to encapsulate plausible relationships between unobserved and observed variables, and posterior inference about the conditional exposure-disease relationship then follows. In practice, though, it can be challenging to form such a prior distribution in both a realistic and simple manner. Moreover, it can be difficult to develop an attendant Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm that will work effectively on a posterior distribution arising from a highly nonidentified model. In this article, a simple prior distribution for acknowledging both poorly measured and unmeasured confounding variables is developed. It requires that only a small number of hyperparameters be set by the user. Moreover, a particular computational approach for posterior inference is developed, because application of MCMC in a standard manner is seen to be ineffective in this problem.
© 2010, The International Biometric Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20070294     DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01377.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  6 in total

1.  Nonparametric Bounds and Sensitivity Analysis of Treatment Effects.

Authors:  Amy Richardson; Michael G Hudgens; Peter B Gilbert; Jason P Fine
Journal:  Stat Sci       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 2.901

2.  Bayesian Approach for Addressing Differential Covariate Measurement Error in Propensity Score Methods.

Authors:  Hwanhee Hong; Kara E Rudolph; Elizabeth A Stuart
Journal:  Psychometrika       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 2.500

3.  Using Sensitivity Analyses for Unobserved Confounding to Address Covariate Measurement Error in Propensity Score Methods.

Authors:  Kara E Rudolph; Elizabeth A Stuart
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Trade-offs of Personal Versus More Proxy Exposure Measures in Environmental Epidemiology.

Authors:  Marc G Weisskopf; Thomas F Webster
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Prior event rate ratio adjustment for hidden confounding in observational studies of treatment effectiveness: a pairwise Cox likelihood approach.

Authors:  Nan Xuan Lin; William Edward Henley
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  Adjustment for unmeasured confounding through informative priors for the confounder-outcome relation.

Authors:  Rolf H H Groenwold; Inbal Shofty; Milica Miočević; Maarten van Smeden; Irene Klugkist
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-12-22       Impact factor: 4.615

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.