Anna Holdgate1, Anthony Cao, Ka Mei Lo. 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, Australia. anna.holdgate@swsahs.nsw.gov.au
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The objective was to determine whether the introduction of intranasal (IN) fentanyl for children with acute pain would reduce the time to analgesic administration in a mixed adult and pediatric emergency department (ED). METHODS: A protocol for IN fentanyl (1.5 microg/ kg) for children age 1-15 years presenting with acute pain was introduced to the department. All children who received intravenous (IV) morphine in the 7 months prior to the introduction of the protocol and either IV morphine or IN fentanyl in the 7 months after the introduction of the protocol were identified from drug registers. Time to analgesic administration, time to see a doctor, and the ages of patients were compared between the periods before and after the introduction of IN fentanyl. RESULTS: Following implementation, 81 patients received IN fentanyl and 37 received IV morphine, compared to 63 patients receivingmorphine in the previous 7 months. The median time to analgesic administration for IN fentanyl was significantly shorter than for morphine (32 minutes vs. 63 minutes, p = 0.001). Children receiving fentanyl were significantly younger than those receiving morphine (median = 8.5 years vs. 12 years, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that children treated with IN fentanyl received analgesic medication faster than those treated with IV morphine in a mixed ED. Younger children were more likely to receive opioid analgesia following the introduction of fentanyl.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVES: The objective was to determine whether the introduction of intranasal (IN) fentanyl for children with acute pain would reduce the time to analgesic administration in a mixed adult and pediatric emergency department (ED). METHODS: A protocol for IN fentanyl (1.5 microg/ kg) for children age 1-15 years presenting with acute pain was introduced to the department. All children who received intravenous (IV) morphine in the 7 months prior to the introduction of the protocol and either IV morphine or IN fentanyl in the 7 months after the introduction of the protocol were identified from drug registers. Time to analgesic administration, time to see a doctor, and the ages of patients were compared between the periods before and after the introduction of IN fentanyl. RESULTS: Following implementation, 81 patients received IN fentanyl and 37 received IV morphine, compared to 63 patients receiving morphine in the previous 7 months. The median time to analgesic administration for IN fentanyl was significantly shorter than for morphine (32 minutes vs. 63 minutes, p = 0.001). Children receiving fentanyl were significantly younger than those receiving morphine (median = 8.5 years vs. 12 years, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that children treated with IN fentanyl received analgesic medication faster than those treated with IV morphine in a mixed ED. Younger children were more likely to receive opioid analgesia following the introduction of fentanyl.
Authors: Michael Joseph Barrett; John Cronin; Adrian Murphy; Siobhan McCoy; John Hayden; SinéadNic an Fhailí; Tim Grant; Abel Wakai; Corrina McMahon; Sean Walsh; Ronan O'Sullivan Journal: Trials Date: 2012-05-30 Impact factor: 2.279