Literature DB >> 2006963

A randomized trial of birthing stool or conventional semirecumbent position for second-stage labor.

U Waldenström, K Gottvall.   

Abstract

Two hundred ninety-four women were randomly allocated to a group in which the use of a birthing stool (experimental group) or a conventional semirecumbent position (control group) was encouraged. The birthing stool was 32 cm high and allowed the parturient to sit upright and to squat. The husband could sit close behind his wife and support her back. No differences were observed between the two groups regarding mode of delivery, length of the second stage of labor, oxytocin augmentation, perineal trauma, labial lacerations, or vulvar edema. Infant outcome measured by Apgar scores at 1 and 5 minutes postpartum and numbers of neonatal intensive care unit transfers was the same in both groups. Mean estimated blood loss and the number of mothers with a postpartum hemorrhage 600 ml or more were greater in the experimental group than in the control group. Women in the experimental group reported less pain during the second stage of labor, and they and their spouses were more satisfied with the birth position than were parents in the control group. Midwives were less satisfied with their working posture in the experimental group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 2006963     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536x.1991.tb00045.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  8 in total

1.  Early modern childbirth.

Authors:  Elizabeth Fee; Theodore M Brown; Roxanne L Beatty
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Anal sphincter lacerations and upright delivery postures--a risk analysis from a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Daniel Altman; Inga Ragnar; Asa Ekström; Tanja Tydén; Sven-Eric Olsson
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-04-25

3.  Quantification of friction force reduction induced by obstetric gels.

Authors:  Robert Riener; Kerstin Leypold; Andreas Brunschweiler; Andreas Schaub; Ulrich Bleul; Peter Wolf
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2009-02-24       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 4.  How can second-stage management prevent perineal trauma? Critical review.

Authors:  P Flynn; J Franiek; P Janssen; W J Hannah; M C Klein
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Effectiveness and acceptability of lidocaine spray in reducing perineal pain during spontaneous vaginal delivery: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Julia Sanders; Rona Campbell; Tim J Peters
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-06-28

Review 6.  Position in the second stage of labour for women without epidural anaesthesia.

Authors:  Janesh K Gupta; Akanksha Sood; G Justus Hofmeyr; Joshua P Vogel
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-05-25

7.  No reduction in instrumental vaginal births and no increased risk for adverse perineal outcome in nulliparous women giving birth on a birth seat: results of a Swedish randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Li Thies-Lagergren; Linda J Kvist; Kyllike Christensson; Ingegerd Hildingsson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2011-03-24       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Striving for scientific stringency: a re-analysis of a randomised controlled trial considering first-time mothers' obstetric outcomes in relation to birth position.

Authors:  Li Thies-Lagergren; Linda J Kvist; Kyllike Christensson; Ingegerd Hildingsson
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 3.007

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.