Literature DB >> 20068502

A critique of the apneic oxygenation test for the diagnosis of "brain death".

James Tibballs1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the reliability and safety of the apneic oxygenation test to diagnose brain death for the purpose of organ donation. DATE SOURCES: Published scientific literature in Medline database, organ donation guidelines and neurophysiological principles described in medical textbooks. STUDY SELECTION: Articles on brain death, apnea testing, and radionuclide scintigraphy. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Hypercarbia with a target Paco2 of 60 mm Hg (8.0 kPa) must be reached before apnea is deemed consistent with brain death in some clinical guidelines, whereas a level of 50 mm Hg (6.7 kPa) is required in another. However, the sensitivity and specificity of the test are doubtful because some patients have commenced spontaneous respiration >60 mm Hg (8.0 kPa) and high levels of Paco2 may cause CO2 narcosis. Furthermore, the test may be harmful if the brain stem is responsive because hypercarbia may also cause intracranial hypertension and contribute to brain damage. Although guidelines for organ donation recommend the test as an essential component of brain death diagnosis, it is often not performed or performed inadequately. Wide variation in conduct of the test has prompted calls for standardization.
CONCLUSIONS: : The apneic oxygenation test is unreliable in the diagnosis of brain death. It is scientifically flawed and hypothesized to cause brain death. In lieu of this test, a reliable test of brain perfusion should be mandatory, whereas the apneic oxygenation test, if performed at all, should be restricted to demonstration of apnea after brain perfusion has been shown to be absent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20068502     DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3181ce75dd

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatr Crit Care Med        ISSN: 1529-7535            Impact factor:   3.624


  6 in total

Review 1.  [Diagnosis of irreversible loss of brain function ("brain death")-what is new?]

Authors:  Uwe Walter; Stephan A Brandt
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 1.214

2.  Medicolegal Complications of Apnoea Testing for Determination of Brain Death.

Authors:  Ariane Lewis; David Greer
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2018-07-06       Impact factor: 1.352

3.  Ethical and Legal Concerns With Nevada's Brain Death Amendments.

Authors:  Greg Yanke; Mohamed Y Rady; Joseph L Verheijde
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 1.352

Review 4.  The intractable problems with brain death and possible solutions.

Authors:  Ari R Joffe; Gurpreet Khaira; Allan R de Caen
Journal:  Philos Ethics Humanit Med       Date:  2021-10-09       Impact factor: 2.464

5.  Does the Uniform Determination of Death Act Need to Be Revised?

Authors:  Doyen Nguyen
Journal:  Linacre Q       Date:  2020-06-02

Review 6.  Apnea Testing for the Determination of Brain Death: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Authors:  Katharina M Busl; Ariane Lewis; Panayiotis N Varelas
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2021-04       Impact factor: 3.532

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.