STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to elucidate the relationship among facet orientation, kinematics of a spinal unit, and change in lumbar spine canal diameter by using kinetic magnetic resonance imaging. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Some studies have suggested an association between increased sagittally oriented facet angles and degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. However, no study has specifically addressed the association of facet orientation with the kinematics of a spinal unit and change in canal diameter. METHODS: Kinetic magnetic resonance imagings were performed with patients in flexion, neutral, and extension positions. Study subjects were classified into 6 groups-AA, BB, CC, AB (BA), BC (CB), and AC (CA)-on the basis of bilateral facet angles (A, narrow; B, normal; and C, wide) and disc and facet joint degeneration. A magnetic resonance imaging analyzer was used for anatomic measurements and for calculating changes in canal diameters and disc bulging as well as the lumbar spine kinematics. RESULTS: Osseous canal diameters were significantly smaller in the group AA than in the group BB, whereas they were significantly larger in the group CC than in the group BB. Canal diameter at the disc level was significantly smaller in the group AA than in the group BB in all 3 positions, whereas it was significantly larger in the group CC than in the group BB. Translational motion was significantly more in the group AA than in the group BB, whereas it was significantly lesser in the group CC than in the group BB. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the relationship among facet orientation, osseous canal diameter, kinematics of a spinal unit, and change in lumbar spine canal diameter. Patients with sagittally oriented facets had narrow osseous canals with mobility, whereas those with coronally oriented facets had stable and wider osseous canals. This finding is helpful in understanding the mechanism underlying lumbar spinal canal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to elucidate the relationship among facet orientation, kinematics of a spinal unit, and change in lumbar spine canal diameter by using kinetic magnetic resonance imaging. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Some studies have suggested an association between increased sagittally oriented facet angles and degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. However, no study has specifically addressed the association of facet orientation with the kinematics of a spinal unit and change in canal diameter. METHODS: Kinetic magnetic resonance imagings were performed with patients in flexion, neutral, and extension positions. Study subjects were classified into 6 groups-AA, BB, CC, AB (BA), BC (CB), and AC (CA)-on the basis of bilateral facet angles (A, narrow; B, normal; and C, wide) and disc and facet joint degeneration. A magnetic resonance imaging analyzer was used for anatomic measurements and for calculating changes in canal diameters and disc bulging as well as the lumbar spine kinematics. RESULTS: Osseous canal diameters were significantly smaller in the group AA than in the group BB, whereas they were significantly larger in the group CC than in the group BB. Canal diameter at the disc level was significantly smaller in the group AA than in the group BB in all 3 positions, whereas it was significantly larger in the group CC than in the group BB. Translational motion was significantly more in the group AA than in the group BB, whereas it was significantly lesser in the group CC than in the group BB. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated the relationship among facet orientation, osseous canal diameter, kinematics of a spinal unit, and change in lumbar spine canal diameter. Patients with sagittally oriented facets had narrow osseous canals with mobility, whereas those with coronally oriented facets had stable and wider osseous canals. This finding is helpful in understanding the mechanism underlying lumbar spinal canal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis.
Authors: Bin Lv; Sixin Sun; Haosheng Wang; Li Xiao; Tao Xu; Peng Ji; Jishan Yuan; Hua Ding; Jun Xie; Nan Meng; Lei Zhang; Minjie Hu; Qinyi Jiang; Lei Wang; Xiang Yao Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2020-12-09 Impact factor: 3.411