Literature DB >> 20068299

Cross-species chromosome painting corroborates microchromosome fusion during karyotype evolution of birds.

T Hansmann1, I Nanda, V Volobouev, F Yang, M Schartl, T Haaf, M Schmid.   

Abstract

The stone curlew, also known as thick-knee (Burhinus oedicnemus, BOE), represents a phylogenetically young species of the shorebirds (Charadriiformes) that exhibits one of the most atypical genome organizations known within the class of Aves, due to an extremely low diploid number (2n = 42) and only 6 pairs of microchromosomes in its complement. This distinct deviation from the 'typical' avian karyotype is attributed to repeated fusions of ancestral microchromosomes. In order to compare different species with this atypical avian karyotype and to investigate the chromosome rearrangement patterns, chromosome-specific painting probes representing the whole genome of the stone curlew were used to delineate chromosome homology between BOE and 5 species belonging to 5 different avian orders: herring gull (Charadriiformes), cockatiel (Psittaciformes), rock pigeon (Columbiformes), great gray owl (Strigiformes) and Eurasian coot (Gruiformes). Paints derived from the 20 BOE autosomes delimited 28 to 33 evolutionarily conserved segments in the karyotypes of the 5 species, similar to the number recognized by BOE paints in such a basal lineage as the chicken (28 conserved segments). This suggests a high degree of conservation in genome organization in birds. BOE paints also revealed some species-specific rearrangements. In particular, chromosomes BOE1-4 and 14, as well as to a large extent BOE5 and 6, showed conserved synteny with macrochromosomes, whereas homologous regions for BOE7-13 are found to be largely distributed on microchromosomes in the species investigated. Interestingly, the 6 pairs of BOE microchromosomes 15-20 appear to have undergone very few rearrangements in the 5 lineages investigated. Although the arrangements of BOE homologous segments on some chromosomes can be explained by complex fusions and inversions, the occurrence of homologous regions at multiple sites may point to fission of ancestral chromosomes in the karyotypes of the species investigated. However, the present results demonstrate that the ancestral microchromosomes most likely experienced fusion in the stone curlew lineage forming the medium-sized BOE chromosomes, while they have been conserved as microchromosomes in the other neoavian lineages. Copyright 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20068299     DOI: 10.1159/000251965

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cytogenet Genome Res        ISSN: 1424-8581            Impact factor:   1.636


  15 in total

1.  Novel tools for characterising inter and intra chromosomal rearrangements in avian microchromosomes.

Authors:  Pamela E Lithgow; Rebecca O'Connor; Deborah Smith; Gothami Fonseka; Abdullah Al Mutery; Claudia Rathje; Richard Frodsham; Patricia O'Brien; Fumio Kasai; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Benjamin M Skinner; Darren K Griffin
Journal:  Chromosome Res       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 5.239

2.  Origin of amphibian and avian chromosomes by fission, fusion, and retention of ancestral chromosomes.

Authors:  Stephen R Voss; D Kevin Kump; Srikrishna Putta; Nathan Pauly; Anna Reynolds; Rema J Henry; Saritha Basa; John A Walker; Jeramiah J Smith
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2011-04-11       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Multidirectional chromosome painting substantiates the occurrence of extensive genomic reshuffling within Accipitriformes.

Authors:  Wenhui Nie; Patricia C M O'Brien; Beiyuan Fu; Jinghuan Wang; Weiting Su; Kai He; Bertrand Bed'Hom; Vitaly Volobouev; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Gauthier Dobigny; Fengtang Yang
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-09-26       Impact factor: 3.260

4.  Next Generation Sequencing of Chromosome-Specific Libraries Sheds Light on Genome Evolution in Paleotetraploid Sterlet (Acipenser ruthenus).

Authors:  Daria A Andreyushkova; Alexey I Makunin; Violetta R Beklemisheva; Svetlana A Romanenko; Anna S Druzhkova; Larisa B Biltueva; Natalya A Serdyukova; Alexander S Graphodatsky; Vladimir A Trifonov
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2017-11-10       Impact factor: 4.096

5.  Upgrading short-read animal genome assemblies to chromosome level using comparative genomics and a universal probe set.

Authors:  Joana Damas; Rebecca O'Connor; Marta Farré; Vasileios Panagiotis E Lenis; Henry J Martell; Anjali Mandawala; Katie Fowler; Sunitha Joseph; Martin T Swain; Darren K Griffin; Denis M Larkin
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 9.043

6.  Chromosome painting in Glyphorynchus spirurus (Vieillot, 1819) detects a new fission in Passeriformes.

Authors:  Talita Fernanda Augusto Ribas; Cleusa Yoshiko Nagamachi; Alexandre Aleixo; Melquizedec Luiz Silva Pinheiro; Patricia Caroline Mary O Brien; Malcolm Andrew Ferguson-Smith; Fengtang Yang; Pablo Suarez; Julio Cesar Pieczarka
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Tracing the evolution of amniote chromosomes.

Authors:  Janine E Deakin; Tariq Ezaz
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  Two low coverage bird genomes and a comparison of reference-guided versus de novo genome assemblies.

Authors:  Daren C Card; Drew R Schield; Jacobo Reyes-Velasco; Matthew K Fujita; Audra L Andrew; Sara J Oyler-McCance; Jennifer A Fike; Diana F Tomback; Robert P Ruggiero; Todd A Castoe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Karyotype Evolution in Birds: From Conventional Staining to Chromosome Painting.

Authors:  Rafael Kretschmer; Malcolm A Ferguson-Smith; Edivaldo Herculano Correa de Oliveira
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 4.096

10.  Banding cytogenetics of chimeric hybrids Coturnixcoturnix × Coturnixjaponica and comparative analysis with the domestic fowl.

Authors:  Yasmine Kartout-Benmessaoud; Kafia Ladjali-Mohammedi
Journal:  Comp Cytogenet       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 1.800

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.