Literature DB >> 20068211

The benefits and harms of mammography screening: understanding the trade-offs.

Steven Woloshin1, Lisa M Schwartz.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20068211     DOI: 10.1001/jama.2009.2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


× No keyword cloud information.
  22 in total

Review 1.  Evidence, values, guidelines and rational decision-making.

Authors:  Bruce Barrett
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Impact of an educational intervention designed to reduce unnecessary recall during screening mammography.

Authors:  Patricia A Carney; Linn Abraham; Andrea Cook; Stephen A Feig; Edward A Sickles; Diana L Miglioretti; Berta M Geller; Bonnie C Yankaskas; Joann G Elmore
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Mammographic performance in a population-based screening program: before, during, and after the transition from screen-film to full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  Solveig Hofvind; Per Skaane; Joann G Elmore; Sofie Sebuødegård; Solveig Roth Hoff; Christoph I Lee
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Identifying Sociocultural Barriers to Mammography Adherence Among Appalachian Kentucky Women.

Authors:  Elisia L Cohen; Bethney R Wilson; Robin C Vanderpool; Tom Collins
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2015-02-10

5.  Modeling the impact of population screening on breast cancer mortality in the United States.

Authors:  Jeanne S Mandelblatt; Kathleen A Cronin; Donald A Berry; Yaojen Chang; Harry J de Koning; Sandra J Lee; Sylvia K Plevritis; Clyde B Schechter; Natasha K Stout; Nicolien T van Ravesteyn; Marvin Zelen; Eric J Feuer
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.380

6.  Consequences of false-positive screening mammograms.

Authors:  Anna N A Tosteson; Dennis G Fryback; Cristina S Hammond; Lucy G Hanna; Margaret R Grove; Mary Brown; Qianfei Wang; Karen Lindfors; Etta D Pisano
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 21.873

7.  Impact of a False-Positive Screening Mammogram on Subsequent Screening Behavior and Stage at Breast Cancer Diagnosis.

Authors:  Firas M Dabbous; Therese A Dolecek; Michael L Berbaum; Sarah M Friedewald; Wm Thomas Summerfelt; Kent Hoskins; Garth H Rauscher
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-02-09       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  How Do Women View Risk-Based Mammography Screening? A Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Xiaofei He; Karen E Schifferdecker; Elissa M Ozanne; Anna N A Tosteson; Steven Woloshin; Lisa M Schwartz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2018-07-31       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Evaluation of risk communication in a mammography patient decision aid.

Authors:  Krystal A Klein; Lindsey Watson; Joan S Ash; Karen B Eden
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2016-02-26

10.  From cancer screening to treatment: service delivery and referral in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.

Authors:  Jacqueline W Miller; Vivien Hanson; Gale D Johnson; Janet E Royalty; Lisa C Richardson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-08-15       Impact factor: 6.860

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.