Literature DB >> 20067975

High levels of foot ulceration and amputation risk in a multiracial cohort of diabetic patients on dialysis therapy.

Agbor Ndip1, Lawrence A Lavery, Javier Lafontaine, Martin K Rutter, Anand Vardhan, Loretta Vileikyte, Andrew J M Boulton.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of lower-limb complications in a multiracial cohort of patients with diabetes receiving dialysis. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This work was a cross-sectional study of lower-limb complications in dialysis-treated patients with diabetes in the U.K. and U.S.
RESULTS: We studied 466 patients (139 U.K.; 327 U.S.). The prevalence of lower-limb complications was high (foot ulcers 12%, neuropathy 79%, peripheral arterial disease 57%, history of foot ulceration 34%, and prior amputation 18%), with no significant ethnic variation, except that foot ulcers were more common in whites than in patients of African descent (P = 0.013). Ninety-five percent of patients were at high risk of lower-limb complications. Prior amputation was related to foot ulcer history, peripheral arterial disease, and hemodialysis modality in multivariable analysis. Prevalent ulceration showed independent associations with foot ulcer history and peripheral arterial disease, but not with ethnicity.
CONCLUSIONS: All patients with diabetes receiving dialysis are at high risk of lower-limb complications independent of ethnic background.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20067975      PMCID: PMC2845045          DOI: 10.2337/dc09-2007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


Among individuals with diabetes, significant ethnic differences in lower-limb complications have been identified in the U.K. (1) and the U.S. (2). Previous studies linking renal impairment or end-stage renal disease to lower-limb complications have been retrospective and have not considered ethnicity (3,4). We aimed to establish the prevalence of lower-limb complications by ethnic group in dialysis-treated diabetic patients.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a prospectively designed cross-sectional study including patients with diabetes receiving dialysis therapy from centers in Manchester (U.K.) and Texas (U.S.). During routine clinic appointments, patients were interviewed and had a detailed foot examination including neurological (5,6) and peripheral arterial disease (PAD) assessment. Data were collected on diabetes and dialysis status, foot conditions, foot care, and footwear. Peripheral neuropathy was defined as vibration perception threshold >25 V (Neurothesiometer; Horwell Scientific Laboratory Supplies, Nottingham, U.K.) and/or a modified neuropathy disability score >3 (5,6). PAD was defined as follows: ankle/brachial pressure index (ABPI) <0.9 (7), a history of peripheral artery revascularization or angiography confirming PAD, noncompressible arteries (ABPI >1.4 with monophasic or biphasic waveforms) (8), or the absence of two or more foot pulses on palpation (9). The International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) risk classification was used to assign patients into four levels of increasing risk of lower-limb complications (9): no recognizable risk factor (risk category 0); neuropathy and no other risk factors (risk category 1); PAD with or without neuropathy (risk category 2); or prevalent foot ulceration, a history of foot ulcer, or prior amputation (risk category 3). Patients in risk categories 1, 2, or 3 were considered to be at high risk of lower-limb complications. Ethnicity was based on patient self-report. The study received prior approval from the relevant ethics committee and review boards. Pearson's χ2 and Fisher's exact tests were used for between-group comparisons of categorical data. ANOVA was used to assess the influence of ethnic group on lower-limb complications. Proportions of patients with lower-limb complications are presented with 95% CI estimated by the modified Wald method. Univariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with prevalent foot ulceration or prior amputation, and variables with significant associations were included in multivariate logistic regression. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Analyses were performed using SPSS version 15.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL).

RESULTS

We studied 466 patients (139 U.K., 327 U.S.). Eighty-eight percent were receiving hemodialysis; the remainder received peritoneal dialysis. Recruitment center (U.K. or U.S.) was not associated with prevalent foot ulcer or prior amputation in univariate analysis. We observed a high prevalence of PAD and peripheral neuropathy and a moderately high prevalence of past foot ulceration and amputation that did not vary by ethnicity (Table 1). The only foot complication that varied by ethnicity was current foot ulceration, which affected approximately one in eight patients, with whites having a higher prevalence than patients of African descent (16.4 vs. 4.5%, P = 0.013) but not significantly higher than Asians or Hispanics. Based on IWGDF risk categories, 95% of all patients were considered to be high risk.
Table 1

Prevalence of foot ulcers, amputations, and risk factors for developing lower-limb complications by ethnic groups

WhiteHispanicAfricanAsianTotalP (ANOVA for ethnicity)
n1961657035466
Age (years)61 ± 1461 ± 1259 ± 1357 ± 1260 ± 130.363
Sex (% male)55525357530.896
Diabetes (% type 1)234611130.001
Time since diagnosis of diabetes (years)21 ± 1118 ± 1021 ± 1017 ± 920 ± 100.012
Glycated hemoglobin (%)7.4 ± 1.76.9 ± 1.47.2 ± 1.87.6 ± 1.27.2 ± 1.60.005
Current foot ulcer* (%)16 (12–22)10 (6–15)4 (1–12)11 (4–27)12 (9–15)0.041
Past foot ulcer* (%)36 (30–43)34 (27–41)30 (20–41)20 (10–36)33 (29–38)0.277
Past or present foot ulcer* (%)42 (35–49)39 (32–46)34 (24–46)26 (14–42)38 (34–43)0.276
Amputation* (%)15 (11–21)20 (15–27)21 (13–32)9 (2–23)18 (14–21)0.286
PAD* (%)54 (47–61)58 (50–65)63 (51–73)54 (38–69)57 (52–61)0.672
Peripheral neuropathy* (%)82 (76–87)76 (69–82)79 (68–87)89 (73–96)80 (76–83)0.313
IWGDF risk category
    0: No risk factors (%)5 (3–9)5 (2–9)3 (0.1–10)0 (0–12)4.5 (3–7)0.208
    1: DPN only (%)9 (6–13)2 (0.4–5)6 (2–14)29 (16–45)7 (5–10)
    2: PAD ± neuropathy (%)44 (37–51)55 (47–62)57 (45–68)46 (30–62)50 (45–54)
    3: Present or past ulcer or amputation (%)43 (36–50)39 (32–46)34 (24–46)26 (14–42)39 (34–43)

Data are n, means ± SD, or % (95% CI). White includes all Europeans and similar white origins (U.K.) and non-Hispanic whites (U.S.). The only Native American (n = 1) was included in the white group. Hispanic includes Mexican Americans and similar Hispanic origins (U.S.). African includes people of African descent in the U.K. (African-Caribbeans) and U.S. (African Americans). Asian includes Indo-Asians or similar Asian origin (U.K. only).

*95% CIs are calculated by the modified Wald method.

†Multiple comparison test of variance (Bonferroni correction) confirmed there was no difference between the ethnic groups.

Prevalence of foot ulcers, amputations, and risk factors for developing lower-limb complications by ethnic groups Data are n, means ± SD, or % (95% CI). White includes all Europeans and similar white origins (U.K.) and non-Hispanic whites (U.S.). The only Native American (n = 1) was included in the white group. Hispanic includes Mexican Americans and similar Hispanic origins (U.S.). African includes people of African descent in the U.K. (African-Caribbeans) and U.S. (African Americans). Asian includes Indo-Asians or similar Asian origin (U.K. only). *95% CIs are calculated by the modified Wald method. †Multiple comparison test of variance (Bonferroni correction) confirmed there was no difference between the ethnic groups. Prevalent foot ulceration showed univariate associations with PAD (OR [95% CI]: 4.5 [2.1–9.4], P < 0.0001), foot ulcer history (3.1 [1.7–5.4], P < 0.0001), retinopathy (4.0 [1.9–8.3], P < 0.0001), white ethnicity (2.1 [1.2–3.7], P = 0.008), and failure to wear bespoke footwear (2.1 [1.2–3.6], P = 0.010). Prevalent foot ulceration remained independently associated with PAD (4.1 [1.9–8.6], P < 0.0001) and foot ulcer history (2.8 [1.6–5.1], P = 0.001) in multivariate analysis. Prior amputation showed univariate associations with foot ulcer history (46 [19-110], P < 0.0001), PAD (3.8 [2.1–6.8], P < 0.0001), failure to wear bespoke footwear (3.8 [2.3–6.2], P < 0.0001), hemodialysis modality (2.9 [1.1–8.3], P = 0.023), peripheral neuropathy (2.3 [1.1–4.7], P = 0.016), male sex (1.7 [1.1–2.8], P = 0.019), and retinopathy (1.6 [1.0–2.7], P = 0.043). Prior amputation was independently associated with foot ulcer history (42 [17-100], P < 0.0001), PAD (4.1 [2.9–8.4], P < 0.0001), and hemodialysis modality (17 [2-132], P = 0.008) in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

We report a high prevalence of lower-limb complications in a large ethnically diverse cohort of diabetic patients on dialysis, with up to 95% of them having at least one recognizable risk factor for foot ulceration. Contrary to previous reports of ethnic variations of foot complications in diabetes (1,2), we observed no ethnic variation in prevalent foot complications in our dialysis-treated cohort, except for prevalent foot ulceration. This may be due to these patients having a heavy burden of systemic end-stage microvascular and macrovascular disease, such that ethnic differences become relatively insignificant. Diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease are likely to have falsely elevated ABPI levels (10,11), and ABPI measurements are less able to detect occlusion in arterial segments distal to the ankle, which might be detected by palpation of distal pedal pulses. Therefore, we used a combination of criteria to define subjects with PAD. Our data confirm and extend previous reports on diabetic foot disease in the end-stage renal disease population (12,13). The strengths of our study include the following: the large multiethnic sample providing reliable prevalence data, the inclusion of U.K. and U.S. centers, and a comprehensive assessment of foot pathology. Our study is limited by the small number of patients receiving peritoneal dialysis and suboptimal information on preventative and therapeutic care. Although this was not an intervention study, we believe that our findings have immediate implications for foot care delivery. Because we found that 95% of dialysis-treated diabetic patients are at high risk for foot problems, we suggest that all such patients should be considered to be high risk. Dialysis-treated patients may fail to attend for appropriate foot care, since they are too concerned with the demands of dialysis (14); therefore, scheduling foot evaluation, education, and interventions during or immediately after dialysis may be a key component of effective prevention (15). In summary, diabetic patients treated with dialysis have a high prevalence of foot ulceration, amputation, and the “high-risk foot” that is similar across all ethnic groups. Comprehensive and multidisciplinary diabetic foot care should be offered to all patients and be integrated within dialysis services.
  14 in total

Review 1.  Does the clinical examination predict lower extremity peripheral arterial disease?

Authors:  Nadia A Khan; Sherali A Rahim; Sonia S Anand; David L Simel; Akbar Panju
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Temporal association between the incidence of foot ulceration and the start of dialysis in diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Frances L Game; Susan Y Chipchase; Richard Hubbard; Richard P Burden; William J Jeffcoate
Journal:  Nephrol Dial Transplant       Date:  2006-07-28       Impact factor: 5.992

3.  Foot ulcer risk is lower in South-Asian and african-Caribbean compared with European diabetic patients in the U.K.: the North-West diabetes foot care study.

Authors:  Caroline A Abbott; Adam P Garrow; Anne L Carrington; Julie Morris; Ernest R Van Ross; Andrew J Boulton
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 19.112

Review 4.  Preventing amputations in patients with end stage renal disease: whatever happened to foot care?

Authors:  M J Richbourg
Journal:  ANNA J       Date:  1998-02

5.  Diabetic foot syndrome: evaluating the prevalence and incidence of foot pathology in Mexican Americans and non-Hispanic whites from a diabetes disease management cohort.

Authors:  Lawrence A Lavery; David G Armstrong; Robert P Wunderlich; Jeffrey Tredwell; Andrew J M Boulton
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 19.112

6.  The association between elevated ankle systolic pressures and peripheral occlusive arterial disease in diabetic and nondiabetic subjects.

Authors:  Victor Aboyans; Elena Ho; Julie O Denenberg; Lindsey A Ho; Loki Natarajan; Michael H Criqui
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2008-08-09       Impact factor: 4.268

7.  Chiropody may prevent amputations in diabetic patients on peritoneal dialysis.

Authors:  Jennifer Lipscombe; Sarbjit V Jassal; Susan Bailey; Joanne M Bargman; Stephen Vas; Dimitrios G Oreopoulos
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2003 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.756

8.  Foot and ankle problems of Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal diabetic patients with end-stage renal disease.

Authors:  Ian McIntyre; Cindy Boughen; Elly Trepman; John M Embil
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 2.827

9.  Association between renal failure and foot ulcer or lower-extremity amputation in patients with diabetes.

Authors:  David J Margolis; Ole Hofstad; Harold I Feldman
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2008-04-04       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Comprehensive foot examination and risk assessment: a report of the task force of the foot care interest group of the American Diabetes Association, with endorsement by the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists.

Authors:  Andrew J M Boulton; David G Armstrong; Stephen F Albert; Robert G Frykberg; Richard Hellman; M Sue Kirkman; Lawrence A Lavery; Joseph W Lemaster; Joseph L Mills; Michael J Mueller; Peter Sheehan; Dane K Wukich
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 19.112

View more
  26 in total

Review 1.  Diabetic foot disease in people with advanced nephropathy and those on renal dialysis.

Authors:  Agbor Ndip; Lawrence A Lavery; Andrew J M Boulton
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.810

2.  Feeling trapped and being torn: physicians' narratives about ethical dilemmas in hemodialysis care that evoke a troubled conscience.

Authors:  Catarina E C Fischer Grönlund; Vera Dahlqvist; Anna I S Söderberg
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2011-05-11       Impact factor: 2.652

3.  Factors associated with lower-extremity amputation in patients with diabetic foot ulcers in a Chinese tertiary care hospital.

Authors:  Zi Guo; Chun Yue; Qiang Qian; Honghui He; Zhaohui Mo
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2019-08-25       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Predictors of first ischemic lower limb ulcer in dialysis patients: an observational cohort study.

Authors:  Simeone Andrulli; Chiara Chiavenna; Maria Carla Bigi; Monica Crepaldi; Cesare Dell'Oro; Flavia Tentori; Celestina Manzoni; Giuseppe Bacchini; Mauro Maria Corti; Giuseppe Pontoriero
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2017-08-22       Impact factor: 3.902

5.  Are We Misdiagnosing Diabetic Foot Osteomyelitis? Is the Gold Standard Gold?

Authors:  Lawrence A Lavery; P Andrew Crisologo; Javier La Fontaine; Kavitha Bhavan; Orhan K Oz; Kathryn E Davis
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Surg       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.286

Review 6.  Preventing and treating foot complications associated with diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  Frank L Bowling; S Tawqeer Rashid; Andrew J M Boulton
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 43.330

7.  Diabetic foot prevention: a neglected opportunity in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Lawrence A Lavery; Nathan A Hunt; Javier Lafontaine; Cory L Baxter; Agbor Ndip; Andrew J M Boulton
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 19.112

8.  Predictors of early mortality and readmissions among dialysis patients undergoing lower extremity amputation.

Authors:  LaTonya J Hickson; Andrew D Rule; Bjorg Thorsteinsdottir; Raymond C Shields; Ivan E Porter; Mark D Fleming; Daniel S Ubl; Cynthia S Crowson; Kristine T Hanson; Bassem T Elhassan; Rajnish Mehrotra; Shipra Arya; Robert C Albright; Amy W Williams; Elizabeth B Habermann
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 4.268

9.  Knowledge and practice of foot self-care among patients with diabetes attending primary healthcare centres in Kuwait: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Fatemah M Alsaleh; Khaled S AlBassam; Zahra K Alsairafi; Abdallah Y Naser
Journal:  Saudi Pharm J       Date:  2021-04-23       Impact factor: 4.330

10.  Risk factors associated with lower extremity amputation in Sudanese individuals with diabetes: The need for improvement in primary health care system.

Authors:  Alaa Tag E Elkhider; Ahmed O Almobark; Safaa Badi; Hanan Tahir; Azza Ramadan; Abbas A Khalil; Elamin Elshaikh; Mohamed H Ahmed
Journal:  J Family Med Prim Care       Date:  2021-02-27
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.