Literature DB >> 20067747

When should we intervene to control the 2009 influenza A(H1N1) pandemic?

H Sato1, H Nakada, R Yamaguchi, S Imoto, S Miyano, M Kami.   

Abstract

We simulated the early phase of the 2009 influenza A(H1N1) pandemic and assessed the effectiveness of public health interventions in Japan. We show that the detection rate of border quarantine was low and the timing of the intervention was the most important factor involved in the control of the pandemic, with the maximum reduction in daily cases obtained after interventions started on day 6 or 11. Early interventions were not always effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20067747     DOI: 10.2807/ese.15.01.19455-en

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Euro Surveill        ISSN: 1025-496X


  4 in total

1.  Zika - A Pandemic in Progress?

Authors:  Fauziah Mohamad Idris
Journal:  Malays J Med Sci       Date:  2016-03

2.  Enhancement of collective immunity in Tokyo metropolitan area by selective vaccination against an emerging influenza pandemic.

Authors:  Masaya M Saito; Seiya Imoto; Rui Yamaguchi; Masaharu Tsubokura; Masahiro Kami; Haruka Nakada; Hiroki Sato; Satoru Miyano; Tomoyuki Higuchi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Was mandatory quarantine necessary in China for controlling the 2009 H1N1 pandemic?

Authors:  Xinhai Li; Wenjun Geng; Huidong Tian; Dejian Lai
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Dynamics of a model with quarantine-adjusted incidence and quarantine of susceptible individuals.

Authors:  Mohammad A Safi; Abba B Gumel
Journal:  J Math Anal Appl       Date:  2012-10-17       Impact factor: 1.583

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.