Literature DB >> 20067379

Utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound for evaluation of thyroid nodules.

Bo Zhang1, Yu-Xin Jiang, Ji-Bin Liu, Meng Yang, Qing Dai, Qing-Li Zhu, Pin Gao.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: No conventional imaging method reliably distinguishes between benign and malignant thyroid nodules. Our objectives were to characterize the enhancement patterns of thyroid nodules on gray-scale contrast-enhanced ultrasound (US) and to evaluate whether these patterns were useful in the differential diagnosis of thyroid nodules.
METHODS: Ninety-five patients, scheduled for surgery for thyroid nodules detected by gray-scale sonography, were enrolled in this prospective study. In all, there were 104 nodules (47 papillary carcinomas, 3 medullary carcinomas, 1 metastatic carcinoma, 44 hyperplasia nodule, 7 follicular adenomas, 1 suture granulomas, and 1 Hashimoto's disease). After intraveneous (i.v.) injection of a 1.2 mL bolus of SonoVue, lesions were scanned with real-time gray-scale pulse inversion harmonic imaging US for at least 3 minutes at low mechanical index (MI) (0.05 to 0.08). The enhancement patterns were classified into one of four patterns by two experienced readers.
RESULTS: After administration of SonoVue, four enhancement patterns (homogeneous, heterogeneous, ring-enhancing, and no enhancement) were observed. Four benign and 3 malignant nodules had homogeneous enhancement pattern, 4 benign and 45 malignant nodules had heterogeneous enhancement, 44 benign and 3 malignant nodules had ring enhancement, and 1 benign nodule had no enhancement. There was a significant difference between benign and malignant nodules (p < 0.001). The benign thyroid nodules showed four enhancement patterns: ring enhancement 44/53 (83.0%), homogeneous enhancement 4/53 (7.5%), heterogeneous enhancement 4/53 (7.5%), and no enhancement 1/44 (1.9%). The malignant thyroid nodules showed three enhancement patterns: heterogeneous enhancement 45/51 (88.2%), ring enhancement 3/51 (5.9%), and homogeneous enhancement 3/51 (5.9%). Ring enhancement correlated highly with a benign diagnosis (sensitivity 83.0%, specificity 94.1%, positive predictive value 93.6%, negative predictive value 84.2%, and accuracy 88.5%). Heterogeneous enhancement correlated highly with a malignant diagnosis (sensitivity 88.2%, specificity, 92.5% positive predictive value 91.8%, negative predictive value 89.1%, and accuracy 90.4%). In both mixed and solid nodules, ring enhancement was highly predictive of a benign finding, whereas heterogeneous enhancement was highly predictive of a malignant finding.
CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced US enhancement patterns were different in benign and malignant lesions. Ring enhancement was predictive of benign lesions, whereas heterogeneous enhancement was helpful for detecting malignant lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20067379     DOI: 10.1089/thy.2009.0045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thyroid        ISSN: 1050-7256            Impact factor:   6.568


  50 in total

1.  Quantitative evaluation of contrast-enhanced ultrasound after intravenous administration of a microbubble contrast agent for differentiation of benign and malignant thyroid nodules: assessment of diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  Ursula Nemec; Stefan F Nemec; Clemens Novotny; Michael Weber; Christian Czerny; Christian R Krestan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2012-02-10       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Quantitative analysis of suspicious thyroid nodules by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography.

Authors:  Yizhou Hu; Ping Li; Shufei Jiang; Fenghua Li
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-07-15

3.  Diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in solid thyroid nodules with and without enhancement.

Authors:  Qiong Wu; Yan Wang; Yi Li; Bing Hu; Zhi-Yan He
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.633

4.  Clinical value of elasticity imaging and contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the diagnosis of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma.

Authors:  Fengsheng Li; Jianlei Zhang; Yunmei Wang; Liwen Liu
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2015-06-17       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Accuracy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in the identification of thyroid nodules: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Biyun Sun; Lin Lang; Xiangming Zhu; Feng Jiang; Yun Hong; Lianping He
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-08-15

6.  Evaluation of thyroid cancer in Chinese females with breast cancer by vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), microvessel density, and contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS).

Authors:  Xi Wei; Ying Li; Sheng Zhang; Gao Ming
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2014-04-01

7.  Association between real-time contrast-enhanced ultrasound characteristics and thyroid carcinoma size.

Authors:  Zhang Yuan; Jiang Quan; Zhang Yunxiao; Chen Jian; H E Zhu
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-05-15

8.  Is there a real diagnostic impact of elastosonography and contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in the management of thyroid nodules?

Authors:  Massimo Giusti; Davide Orlandi; Giulia Melle; Barbara Massa; Enzo Silvestri; Francesco Minuto; Gianni Turtulici
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.066

9.  Contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) facilitated US in detecting lateral neck lymph node metastasis of thyroid cancer patients: diagnosis value and enhancement patterns of malignant lymph nodes.

Authors:  Dapeng Xiang; Yurong Hong; Bo Zhang; Pintong Huang; Guogang Li; Ping Wang; Zhiyu Li
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-07-09       Impact factor: 5.315

10.  Two-dimensional shear wave elastography as promising diagnostic tool for predicting malignant thyroid nodules: a prospective single-centre experience.

Authors:  Baoxian Liu; Jinyu Liang; Yanling Zheng; Xiaoyan Xie; Guangliang Huang; Luyao Zhou; Wei Wang; Mingde Lu
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 5.315

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.