Literature DB >> 20067353

Use of physical performance tests in a group of Brazilian Portuguese-speaking individuals with low back pain.

Inácio Teixeira da Cunha-Filho1, Fernanda Corsino Lima, Frank Ross Guimarães, Henrique Raphael Leite.   

Abstract

Low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent condition across cultures, and the tools used for assessment of distinct groups need to be evaluated. Our goal was to investigate the psychometric properties of physical performance tests (PPTs) in a group of Brazilian Portuguese-speaking (BPS) individuals with LBP in a nonexperimental, descriptive study. BPS individuals with and without LBP were studied, and PPTs, self-report questionnaires, and VAS pain score were evaluated. Thirty individuals with LBP (Patient Group (PG)) and 30 healthy subjects (Control Group (CG)) were assessed by 7 PPTs: timed up and go (TUG), loaded forward reach (LFR), 50-foot walk (50 FW), 5-minute walking (5 MW), sit-stand (SS), repeated trunk flexion (RTF), and lumbar flexion (LF). The PG completed the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) and the Self-efficacy Scale (SES) and rated their current level of pain by a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). PPTs were highly reliable in the PG with ICC scores ranging from 0.92 to 0.99 (p < 0.0001). The CG performed better in all PPTs but the LFR. In the PG the correlations among the PPT varied from 0.38 to 0.78 (p < 0.05). RMDQ correlated significantly with RTF, SS, 5 MW (0.38 to 0.47, p < 0.05). PPTs were reliable with the BPS patients and able to differentiate groups. RMDQ complements the assessment of these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20067353     DOI: 10.3109/09593980802602844

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Physiother Theory Pract        ISSN: 0959-3985            Impact factor:   2.279


  7 in total

1.  Level of Evidence for Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of Physical Capacity Tasks Designed to Assess Functioning in Patients With Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review Using the COSMIN Standards.

Authors:  Max Jakobsson; Annelie Gutke; Lidwine B Mokkink; Rob Smeets; Mari Lundberg
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2019-04-01

Review 2.  Factors associated with functional capacity test results in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: a systematic review.

Authors:  Renske van Abbema; Sandra E Lakke; Michiel F Reneman; Cees P van der Schans; Corrien J M van Haastert; Jan H B Geertzen; Harriët Wittink
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2011-12

3.  Steadiness of Spinal Regions during Single-Leg Standing in Older Adults with and without Chronic Low Back Pain.

Authors:  Yi-Liang Kuo; Kuo-Yuan Huang; Pei-Tzu Chiang; Pei-Yun Lee; Yi-Ju Tsai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  The impact of chronic low back pain on physical performance, fear avoidance beliefs, and depressive symptoms: A comparative study on Turkish elderly population.

Authors:  Emine Aslan Telci; Nesrin Yagci; Tuba Can; Ugur Cavlak
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 1.088

5.  Association of Physical Performance and Fear-Avoidance Beliefs in Adults with Chronic Low Back Pain.

Authors:  V P Panhale; R S Gurav; S K Nahar
Journal:  Ann Med Health Sci Res       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec

Review 6.  Do people with low back pain walk differently? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jo Armour Smith; Heidi Stabbert; Jennifer J Bagwell; Hsiang-Ling Teng; Vernie Wade; Szu-Ping Lee
Journal:  J Sport Health Sci       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 13.077

7.  Postural Responses to a Suddenly Released Pulling Force in Older Adults with Chronic Low Back Pain: An Experimental Study.

Authors:  Pei-Yun Lee; Sang-I Lin; Yu-Ting Liao; Ruey-Mo Lin; Che-Chia Hsu; Kuo-Yuan Huang; Yi-Ting Chen; Yi-Ju Tsai
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.