BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus have a high risk of developing cardiovascular (CV) disease. The clinical benefit of use of statins in patients with type 2 diabetes has been demonstrated in several randomized, controlled trials, including the CARDS clinical trial. Based on the clinical CARDS data, the favourable cost effectiveness of atorvastatin 10 mg in patients with type 2 diabetes has been demonstrated in countries such as the UK and France. This study aimed to estimate the cost effectiveness in the Belgian setting of atorvastatin 10 mg compared with no treatment for the primary prevention of CV events in type 2 diabetes patients without a history of CV disease. METHODS: A Markov model with 1-year cycles was developed to simulate the CV event and death risk according to the therapeutic approach initiated. The transition probabilities for CV events in the 'no statin treatment' group were derived from the risk equations reported from the large UKPDS. Risk reductions from the CARDS clinical trial were used to adjust these CV event probabilities in the atorvastatin 10 mg treatment group. The characteristics of type 2 diabetes patients without a CV history were derived from the Belgian OCAPI survey. The public healthcare payers' perspective was taken into account for costing. The direct medical costs of CV events were based on the Public Health Authorities' hospital database for acute care costs and on the literature for the follow-up costs. The impact on the reimbursement system of generic entry to the market was considered in the drug cost. Costs were valued as at year 2009; costs and outcomes were discounted at 3% and 1.5%, respectively. RESULTS: Based on a 5-year time horizon, atorvastatin was demonstrated to be cost effective with an incremental cost/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) of euro 16,681. Over a lifetime horizon (25 years), atorvastatin was demonstrated to be a cost-saving therapeutic intervention. At a threshold of euro 30,000/QALY, atorvastatin had a 98.8% probability of being cost effective. CONCLUSION: Compared with 'no treatment', use of atorvastatin 10 mg as a primary prevention intervention in Belgian type 2 diabetes patients not only improves CV outcomes, but also appears to be cost saving over a lifetime horizon.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus have a high risk of developing cardiovascular (CV) disease. The clinical benefit of use of statins in patients with type 2 diabetes has been demonstrated in several randomized, controlled trials, including the CARDS clinical trial. Based on the clinical CARDS data, the favourable cost effectiveness of atorvastatin 10 mg in patients with type 2 diabetes has been demonstrated in countries such as the UK and France. This study aimed to estimate the cost effectiveness in the Belgian setting of atorvastatin 10 mg compared with no treatment for the primary prevention of CV events in type 2 diabetespatients without a history of CV disease. METHODS: A Markov model with 1-year cycles was developed to simulate the CV event and death risk according to the therapeutic approach initiated. The transition probabilities for CV events in the 'no statin treatment' group were derived from the risk equations reported from the large UKPDS. Risk reductions from the CARDS clinical trial were used to adjust these CV event probabilities in the atorvastatin 10 mg treatment group. The characteristics of type 2 diabetespatients without a CV history were derived from the Belgian OCAPI survey. The public healthcare payers' perspective was taken into account for costing. The direct medical costs of CV events were based on the Public Health Authorities' hospital database for acute care costs and on the literature for the follow-up costs. The impact on the reimbursement system of generic entry to the market was considered in the drug cost. Costs were valued as at year 2009; costs and outcomes were discounted at 3% and 1.5%, respectively. RESULTS: Based on a 5-year time horizon, atorvastatin was demonstrated to be cost effective with an incremental cost/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) of euro 16,681. Over a lifetime horizon (25 years), atorvastatin was demonstrated to be a cost-saving therapeutic intervention. At a threshold of euro 30,000/QALY, atorvastatin had a 98.8% probability of being cost effective. CONCLUSION: Compared with 'no treatment', use of atorvastatin 10 mg as a primary prevention intervention in Belgian type 2 diabetespatients not only improves CV outcomes, but also appears to be cost saving over a lifetime horizon.
Authors: Lars Rydén; Eberhard Standl; Małgorzata Bartnik; Greet Van den Berghe; John Betteridge; Menko-Jan de Boer; Francesco Cosentino; Bengt Jönsson; Markku Laakso; Klas Malmberg; Silvia Priori; Jan Ostergren; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Inga Thrainsdottir; Ilse Vanhorebeek; Marco Stramba-Badiale; Peter Lindgren; Qing Qiao; Silvia G Priori; Jean-Jacques Blanc; Andrzej Budaj; John Camm; Veronica Dean; Jaap Deckers; Kenneth Dickstein; John Lekakis; Keith McGregor; Marco Metra; João Morais; Ady Osterspey; Juan Tamargo; José Luis Zamorano; Jaap W Deckers; Michel Bertrand; Bernard Charbonnel; Erland Erdmann; Ele Ferrannini; Allan Flyvbjerg; Helmut Gohlke; Jose Ramon Gonzalez Juanatey; Ian Graham; Pedro Filipe Monteiro; Klaus Parhofer; Kalevi Pyörälä; Itamar Raz; Guntram Schernthaner; Massimo Volpe; David Wood Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Helen M Colhoun; D John Betteridge; Paul N Durrington; Graham A Hitman; H Andrew W Neil; Shona J Livingstone; Margaret J Thomason; Michael I Mackness; Valentine Charlton-Menys; John H Fuller Journal: Lancet Date: 2004 Aug 21-27 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Viti Kothari; Richard J Stevens; Amanda I Adler; Irene M Stratton; Susan E Manley; H Andrew Neil; Rudy R Holman Journal: Stroke Date: 2002-07 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Ian Graham; Dan Atar; Knut Borch-Johnsen; Gudrun Boysen; Gunilla Burell; Renata Cifkova; Jean Dallongeville; Guy De Backer; Shah Ebrahim; Bjørn Gjelsvik; Christoph Herrmann-Lingen; Arno Hoes; Steve Humphries; Mike Knapton; Joep Perk; Silvia G Priori; Kalevi Pyorala; Zeljko Reiner; Luis Ruilope; Susana Sans-Menendez; Wilma Scholte op Reimer; Peter Weissberg; David Wood; John Yarnell; Jose Luis Zamorano; Edmond Walma; Tony Fitzgerald; Marie Therese Cooney; Alexandra Dudina Journal: Eur Heart J Date: 2007-08-28 Impact factor: 29.983
Authors: Scott D Ramsey; Lauren D Clarke; Craig S Roberts; Sean D Sullivan; Scott J Johnson; Larry Z Liu Journal: Pharmacoeconomics Date: 2008 Impact factor: 4.981
Authors: Nick Verhaeghe; Delphine De Smedt; Jan De Maeseneer; Lea Maes; Cornelis Van Heeringen; Lieven Annemans Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2014-08-18 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Sofia Axia Karlsson; Stefan Franzén; Ann-Marie Svensson; Mervete Miftaraj; Björn Eliasson; Karolina Andersson Sundell Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2018-11-28 Impact factor: 2.655