Literature DB >> 20066964

Influence of acarbose on blood glucose and breath hydrogen after carbohydrate load with sucrose or starch.

Rossen Koytchev1, Wolfram Richter, Ulkem Erkent, Valentin Kirkov, Velislava Dimitrova, Andreas Nern, Ulrich Kunter.   

Abstract

A monocentric, open, randomised, single-dose, six-period crossover trial was carried out in healthy volunteers under fasting conditions to establish the most appropriate study design for a pivotal bioequivalence trial with acarbose (CAS 56180-94-0) regarding a) dosage of the drug, b) type of carbohydrate load, c) type of primary endpoint, and d) sample size. 50 g sucrose or 50 g starch were used as carbohydrate load. Acarbose was administered in doses of 50 and 200 mg. Blood glucose and breath hydrogen were evaluated as endpoints. Both acarbose doses reduced the effect of carbohydrate load. Blood glucose: no statistically significant difference could be noted between the overall effect of 50 mg and that of 200 mg acarbose irrespective of the type of carbohydrate load. Breath hydrogen: an influence could be shown only for sucrose as carbohydrate load. Practically no effect was observed with starch. The overall increase of effect is by more than 200% with sucrose when the dose of acarbose increases from 50 to 200 mg. This difference between the effects of both doses of acarbose on breath hydrogen is statistically significant. For a pivotal trial, sucrose is the most appropriate type of carbohydrate load, baseline adjusted area under the breath hydrogen response is the most appropriate primary endpoint, and a dose of 100 mg acarbose is the most appropriate dosage. A total number of 100 subjects will be needed for proving pharmacodynamic equivalence between two acarbose products in a pivotal trial.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20066964     DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1296444

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arzneimittelforschung        ISSN: 0004-4172


  7 in total

1.  Acarbose bioequivalence: exploration of new pharmacodynamic parameters.

Authors:  Min Zhang; Jin Yang; Lei Tao; Lingjun Li; Pengcheng Ma; John Paul Fawcett
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 2.  Acarbose: safe and effective for lowering postprandial hyperglycaemia and improving cardiovascular outcomes.

Authors:  James J DiNicolantonio; Jaikrit Bhutani; James H O'Keefe
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2015-10-19

3.  Salacia Extract Improves Postprandial Glucose and Insulin Response: A Randomized Double-Blind, Placebo Controlled, Crossover Study in Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  Shankaranarayanan Jeykodi; Jayant Deshpande; Vijaya Juturu
Journal:  J Diabetes Res       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 4.011

4.  Method for evaluating the human bioequivalence of acarbose based on pharmacodynamic parameters.

Authors:  Su-Mei Xu; Yu-Ying Xu; Juan Yan; Yi-Fei Zhang; Dai Li; Dan Li; Xiao-Min Li; Jie Guo; Ping-Sheng Xu
Journal:  J Int Med Res       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 1.671

5.  Effects of alpha-glucosidase-inhibiting drugs on acute postprandial glucose and insulin responses: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Marjan Alssema; Carolien Ruijgrok; Ellen E Blaak; Léonie Egli; Pierre Dussort; Sophie Vinoy; Jacqueline M Dekker; M Denise Robertson
Journal:  Nutr Diabetes       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 5.097

6.  Critical evaluation of the role of acarbose in the treatment of diabetes: patient considerations.

Authors:  Christoph Rosak; Gabriele Mertes
Journal:  Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 3.168

7.  Evaluation of the Bioequivalence of Acarbose in Healthy Chinese People.

Authors:  Yan Chen; Fahao Guo; Xin Wang; LuYao Liu; Can Yang; YuQing Xiong; Hong Zhang
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Drug Dev       Date:  2021-02-19
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.