BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: New diagnostic techniques have recently been developed so detection of superficial pharyngeal cancer is dramatically increasing and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) can now be performed on an experimental basis. The aim of this study was to clarify the effectiveness of EMR for superficial pharyngeal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2004 and 2007, 31 patients with 37 pharyngeal lesions underwent EMR at our hospital. EMR using a cap-fitted endoscope (EMR-C) was used on 34 lesions and strip biopsies on the remaining three. We retrospectively assessed the effectiveness of those procedures in treating superficial pharyngeal cancer. RESULTS: Median procedure time was 45 minutes (range 20 - 180 minutes) and median hospital stay was 7 days (range 4 - 12 days). Regarding complications, one patient experienced laryngeal edema, one suffered aspiration pneumonia, and two sustained dermatitis around the mouth caused by Lugol staining. Histologically, 18 lesions were confirmed as carcinoma in situ and the other 19 lesions demonstrated microinvasion of the subepithelial tissue with lymphatic invasion in one case. During the median follow-up period of 40 months (range 21 - 62 months), two patients received radiotherapy and two patients underwent an additional EMR because of recurrent tumors. Five other patients developed metachronous superficial pharyngeal cancers, but all those lesions were resected primarily by EMR while two of the study's 31 patients died from esophageal cancer. None of the remaining 20 patients experienced any recurrent or metachronous tumors during their follow-up periods. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated that EMR was a safe, effective, and minimally invasive treatment for superficial pharyngeal cancer. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart. New York.
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: New diagnostic techniques have recently been developed so detection of superficial pharyngeal cancer is dramatically increasing and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) can now be performed on an experimental basis. The aim of this study was to clarify the effectiveness of EMR for superficial pharyngeal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between 2004 and 2007, 31 patients with 37 pharyngeal lesions underwent EMR at our hospital. EMR using a cap-fitted endoscope (EMR-C) was used on 34 lesions and strip biopsies on the remaining three. We retrospectively assessed the effectiveness of those procedures in treating superficial pharyngeal cancer. RESULTS: Median procedure time was 45 minutes (range 20 - 180 minutes) and median hospital stay was 7 days (range 4 - 12 days). Regarding complications, one patient experienced laryngeal edema, one suffered aspiration pneumonia, and two sustained dermatitis around the mouth caused by Lugol staining. Histologically, 18 lesions were confirmed as carcinoma in situ and the other 19 lesions demonstrated microinvasion of the subepithelial tissue with lymphatic invasion in one case. During the median follow-up period of 40 months (range 21 - 62 months), two patients received radiotherapy and two patients underwent an additional EMR because of recurrent tumors. Five other patients developed metachronous superficial pharyngeal cancers, but all those lesions were resected primarily by EMR while two of the study's 31 patients died from esophageal cancer. None of the remaining 20 patients experienced any recurrent or metachronous tumors during their follow-up periods. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated that EMR was a safe, effective, and minimally invasive treatment for superficial pharyngeal cancer. Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart. New York.
Authors: Gene Hyun Bok; Won Young Cho; Joo Young Cho; So Young Jin; Ji Ho Ahn; Chang Gyun Chun; Tae Hee Lee; Hyun Gun Kim Journal: Clin Endosc Date: 2013-03-31