BACKGROUND: Peptide receptor radiation therapy (PRRT) using [(177)Lu-DOTA(0)-Tyr(3)]-octreotate is a new, promising option for treatment of disseminated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEPNETs). METHODS: During 2006-2008, 26 patients with disseminated GEPNETs were treated with (177)Lu-octreotate. Radiologic response (RECIST), biochemical response [plasma chromogranin-A (P-CgA)], hematologic toxicity [Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC)], absorbed dose to the kidneys (conjugate view method), and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were analyzed. RESULTS: (177)Lu-octreotate (8 GBq) was given one to five times (median = 3) with a 6-week interval between each. Sixteen of the 26 patients were evaluated radiologically; 6 (38%) had partial response (PR), 8 (50%) had stable disease (SD), and 2 (13%) had progressive disease (PD). Seventeen of the 26 patients were evaluated biochemically; 6 (35%) showed a >or=30% decrease, 8 (47%) showed a >or=20% increase, and 3 (18%) showed neither a >or=30% decrease nor a >or=20% increase. The mean absorbed dose to the kidneys was 24 Gy. With a dose limit of 27 Gy to the kidneys, 10 patients did not receive the planned four treatments, while four patients had the potential to receive additional treatment. A significant reduction (p = 0.0013) of GFR was observed at follow-up. Three patients experienced CTC grade 3 hematologic toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: By using the absorbed dose to the kidneys as a limiting factor, treatment with (177)Lu-octreotate can be individualized, e.g., overtreatment can be avoided and patients with the potential to receive additional treatment can be identified. Further studies are needed to define tolerance doses to the kidneys so that treatment can be optimized.
BACKGROUND: Peptide receptor radiation therapy (PRRT) using [(177)Lu-DOTA(0)-Tyr(3)]-octreotate is a new, promising option for treatment of disseminated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEPNETs). METHODS: During 2006-2008, 26 patients with disseminated GEPNETs were treated with (177)Lu-octreotate. Radiologic response (RECIST), biochemical response [plasma chromogranin-A (P-CgA)], hematologic toxicity [Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC)], absorbed dose to the kidneys (conjugate view method), and glomerular filtration rate (GFR) were analyzed. RESULTS: (177)Lu-octreotate (8 GBq) was given one to five times (median = 3) with a 6-week interval between each. Sixteen of the 26 patients were evaluated radiologically; 6 (38%) had partial response (PR), 8 (50%) had stable disease (SD), and 2 (13%) had progressive disease (PD). Seventeen of the 26 patients were evaluated biochemically; 6 (35%) showed a >or=30% decrease, 8 (47%) showed a >or=20% increase, and 3 (18%) showed neither a >or=30% decrease nor a >or=20% increase. The mean absorbed dose to the kidneys was 24 Gy. With a dose limit of 27 Gy to the kidneys, 10 patients did not receive the planned four treatments, while four patients had the potential to receive additional treatment. A significant reduction (p = 0.0013) of GFR was observed at follow-up. Three patients experienced CTC grade 3 hematologic toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: By using the absorbed dose to the kidneys as a limiting factor, treatment with (177)Lu-octreotate can be individualized, e.g., overtreatment can be avoided and patients with the potential to receive additional treatment can be identified. Further studies are needed to define tolerance doses to the kidneys so that treatment can be optimized.
Authors: P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2000-02-02 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: L Kölby; P Bernhardt; H Ahlman; B Wängberg; V Johanson; A Wigander; E Forssell-Aronsson; S Karlsson; B Ahrén; G Stenman; O Nilsson Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2001-02 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: B Wängberg; G Westberg; U Tylén; L Tisell; S Jansson; O Nilsson; V Johansson; T Scherstén; H Ahlman Journal: World J Surg Date: 1996-09 Impact factor: 3.352
Authors: Martijn van Essen; Eric P Krenning; Willem H Bakker; Wouter W de Herder; Maarten O van Aken; Dik J Kwekkeboom Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2007-01-27 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Jenny Oddstig; Peter Bernhardt; Helena Lizana; Ola Nilsson; Håkan Ahlman; Lars Kölby; Eva Forssell-Aronsson Journal: Tumour Biol Date: 2011-11-23
Authors: Giuseppe Lo Russo; Sara Pusceddu; Natalie Prinzi; Martina Imbimbo; Claudia Proto; Diego Signorelli; Milena Vitali; Monica Ganzinelli; Marco Maccauro; Roberto Buzzoni; Ettore Seregni; Filippo de Braud; Marina Chiara Garassino Journal: Tumour Biol Date: 2016-07-27
Authors: B L R Kam; J J M Teunissen; E P Krenning; W W de Herder; S Khan; E I van Vliet; D J Kwekkeboom Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Johanna Svensson; Gertrud Berg; Bo Wängberg; Maria Larsson; Eva Forssell-Aronsson; Peter Bernhardt Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2015-02-06 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Emil Schüler; Maria Larsson; Toshima Z Parris; Martin E Johansson; Khalil Helou; Eva Forssell-Aronsson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-08-19 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Maria Larsson; Peter Bernhardt; Johanna B Svensson; Bo Wängberg; Håkan Ahlman; Eva Forssell-Aronsson Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2012-09-24 Impact factor: 3.138