Literature DB >> 20065346

Integration of spatial relationships and temporal relationships in humans.

Mikaël Molet1, Jeremie Jozefowiez, Ralph R Miller.   

Abstract

Three experiments tested human participants on a two-dimensional, computer, landmark-based search task to assess the integration of independently acquired spatial and temporal relationships. Experiment 1 showed that A-B spatial training followed by B-outcome spatial training resulted in spatial integration in such a way that A was effectively associated with the outcome. Experiment 2 showed that A-B spatial and temporal training followed by B-outcome spatial and temporal training resulted in integration that created both spatial and temporal relationships between A and the outcome. Experiment 3 refuted an alternative explanation, one that is based on decision-making speed, to the temporal-integration strategy that was suggested by Experiment 2. These results replicate in humans the observations regarding spatial integration made by Sawa, Leising, and Blaisdell (2005) using a spatial-search task with pigeons, and they extend those observations to temporal integration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20065346      PMCID: PMC2846430          DOI: 10.3758/LB.38.1.27

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Learn Behav        ISSN: 1543-4494            Impact factor:   1.986


  12 in total

1.  Temporal integration and temporal backward associations in human and nonhuman subjects.

Authors:  Francisco Arcediano; Martha Escobar; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 1.986

2.  Integration of spatial maps in pigeons.

Authors:  Aaron P Blaisdell; Robert G Cook
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2004-06-24       Impact factor: 3.084

3.  Sensory preconditioning in spatial learning using a touch screen task in pigeons.

Authors:  Kosuke Sawa; Kenneth J Leising; Aaron P Blaisdell
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2005-07

4.  Bidirectional associations in humans and rats.

Authors:  Francisco Arcediano; Martha Escobar; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2005-07

5.  Time as content in Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  H I Savastano; R R Miller
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.777

6.  Using context to resolve temporal ambiguity.

Authors:  Mikaël Molet; Gonzalo P Urcelay; Gonzalo Miguez; Ralph R Miller
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2010-01

7.  Averaging temporal duration and spatial position.

Authors:  K Cheng; M L Spetch; P Miceli
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  1996-04

8.  Spatial integration with rats.

Authors:  V D Chamizo; T Rodrigo; N J Mackintosh
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.986

9.  Evidence against integration of spatial maps in humans: generality across real and virtual environments.

Authors:  Bradley R Sturz; Kent D Bodily; Jeffrey S Katz; Debbie M Kelly
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 3.084

10.  Temporal integration in Pavlovian appetitive conditioning in rats.

Authors:  Kenneth J Leising; Kosuke Sawa; Aaron P Blaisdell
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.986

View more
  4 in total

1.  Temporal maps in appetitive Pavlovian conditioning.

Authors:  Kathleen M Taylor; Victory Joseph; Alice S Zhao; Peter D Balsam
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 1.777

2.  Benefiting from trial spacing without the cost of prolonged training: Frequency, not duration, of trials with absent stimuli enhances perceived contingency.

Authors:  Santiago Castiello; Ralph R Miller; James E Witnauer; Doriann M Alcaide; Ethan Fung; Riddhi J Pitliya; Dyedra K C Morrissey; Robin A Murphy
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2022-01-06

3.  Temporal integration and instrumental conditioned reinforcement.

Authors:  Eric A Thrailkill; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Early Auditory Event Related Potentials Distinguish Higher-Order From First-Order Aversive Conditioning.

Authors:  Prateek Dhamija; Allison Wong; Asaf Gilboa
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-11       Impact factor: 3.558

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.